Long Range Hunting Online Magazine

Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics

View Poll Results: Would you buy a Rem 700
Yes 550 74.53%
No 188 25.47%
Voters: 738. You may not vote on this poll


Remington 700 quality

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-29-2012, 08:25 PM
Silver Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 130
Re: Remington 700 quality

Bought my 1st 700 in 1968. Today my rifle collection contains Weatherby's, Sako's Savage, Winchester's and Remington's. I have over 20 Remingtons in this collection. They are still my goto rifle's unless I am comp. shooting and then a go to my customs. By the way. I still have that 1st Remmy. It's a 700 BDL 7mm Mag. Just my 2 cents worth.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2012, 12:02 AM
Silver Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 122
Re: Remington 700 quality

I do not buy Remington Rifles, their quality does not fit my standards and getting a mass produced rifle trued and fitted with a custom barrel and high quality stock costs about the same as getting a rifle build by my prefered gunsmith.
But with a SPS selling for about 1000$ and a Sendero II selling for 2500$, this is no surprise.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2012, 12:38 AM
kc kc is offline
Gold Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Swartz creek Mi
Posts: 969
Re: Remington 700 quality

Heck! I have a few Remingtons from WW2 and they just work fine.
I have more Remingtons than any rifles in my safe.
I just finised a 03A3 Remington built in 1945 I have a new barrel and tricked it out
My Brother took it north to one of the farmes we hunt and was killing cans at 400 yard,
He also made orange discks on a piece of rebar and was killing them at 500 yards.
Keith Sage.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2012, 02:10 AM
Silver Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbia Falls, Montana
Posts: 145
Re: Remington 700 quality

I have owned more rifles than I can recall over the years, I guess a gun has to be very exceptional for me to get all sappy and develope an emotional attatchment to it. No remington that I have ever owned was up to the task in the accuracy department and I even tried the senderos and the light varmint rifles. Every Remington that I have ever fired was at best a one MOA rifle after bedding, trigger work, etc.
The best rifle that I have ever owned was a winchester in .300 win. right out of the box it was a consistent half MOA rifle. The second best was a savage laminate stocked .270. Again it was a half MOA rifle, but it just didn't have the feel that the winchester had.
I just cannot bring myself to buy another remington when I have always been left with buyers remorse after shooting them.
Until lions have their historians, tales of the hunt shall always glorify the hunters. ~African Proverb

‘‘To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them...’’ — Richard Henry Lee, 1787
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2012, 02:23 AM
Silver Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbia Falls, Montana
Posts: 145
Re: Remington 700 quality

I have yet to find a remington 700 that shoots as good as its price point. I have even had senderos and light varmints and none of them shot under 1 MOA with handloads, bedding, trigger work, etc.. I have had winchesters and savage rifles that would shoot half MOA right out of the box using factory ammunition.

I just cannot bring myself to buy another remington after having been so thoroughly disappointed so many times before. The last one I bought was $1050 for the gun and after topping it with quality glass and having about another $1000 in work performed on it, it would shoot fair (right at one MOA), but it would not feed the last round into the chamber and no one could figure it out.
Until lions have their historians, tales of the hunt shall always glorify the hunters. ~African Proverb

‘‘To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them...’’ — Richard Henry Lee, 1787

Last edited by ejones338; 01-30-2012 at 02:25 AM. Reason: mispelling
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2012, 07:11 AM
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northeast
Posts: 2,222
Re: Remington 700 quality

The last four 700's I bought over the years were specials. Three Mil Spects, and the commemorative M40 Scout Sniper rifle, Viet Nam era. One of the Mil Specs wouldn't shoot, the other two were excellent. I was going to just keep the M40 as a collector, but couldn't resist the temptation to shoot it. What a surprise. It consistently keeps 5 shots under an inch at 300 yards with 168 SMK's. They must have paid some attention to the barrel. I suspect it was made in the custom shop. The steel butt plate will kill you. I bought it when you could get them for $900. Now you can't touch them for under $2500. It's plain as hell, but with a period 3-9 Redfield on it, it's my favorite Remington. Generally, the new 700's are not as nice as the older ones. I wouldn't buy a new one. I would stick a barrel on an older action.

"Let us speak courteously, deal fairly, and keep ourselves armed and ready"-T. Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2012, 03:16 PM
Silver Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NY State
Posts: 335
Re: Remington 700 quality

My experience with Remington rifles and shotguns extends to those I have owned in my lifetime; more than 20 now. Most were bought new; the first an 870 in 1978. Several were second hand; two of these being 700's early to mid 60's vintage and one is a 1950's model 760. I have bought 3 700's in the past 4 years; a CDL in 3006, a 7mm Mag SPS, and the newest, a VSSF II chambered in .223. More on these 3 in a bit. Additionally, I cannot count how many I've helped mount a scope on and/or sight in.

The problem with today's Remington product is they spend waaaaay too much time on how the outside looks and almost nothing on what you cannot see inside. They spend a small fortune on marketing and gimmicks. By marketing i'm talking about their TV adds and the like. By gimmicks I'm talking about stuff like that triangled barrel they put on some of their 700's. How many of the gun builders here on LRH build their custom guns with a triangle barrel. I would think it is between slim and none. .... and slim just ran out the door. None of this stuff actually contributes anything to the performance of the product.

Another thing to keep in mind is that Remington like so many other companys is now part of some conglomerate. To make a long story short, the accountants and lawyers run the show today. They only look to turn a profit for the stockholders and stay out of court. Cuts here and there will save X amount of money this quarter and we'll worry about side steping the consequences next quarter. The engineers, tool and die makes, the gunsmiths and machinists who still work there are probably made to feel lucky to have a job at all. Those are the guys that have x amount of time to produce a part or produce an assembly. The accountants and lawyers haven't a clue about the product - they just appease the stockholders.

As for those 3 model 700's I mentioned earlier, my experience with them and one in particular, may offer some proof to my earlier statement about external looks vs internal quality. The 3006 and the 7mm were nothing spectacular. The CDL has a pretty piece of wood fo a stock. My wife liked it in the store. It'll shoot just under a MOA in the best conditions. The 7mm was bought for the action and has since been reworked. More on this gun another time. The .223 VSSF II according to their advertising was supposed to be one of their top quality rifles. It was not.

It wouldn't hold 1 MOA at 100yds with Remington ammo out of the box. My reloads were only slightly better. The bolt and firing pin had fit issues. I debated with myself on whether or not to return it to the factory. I didn't. Instead, a local smith made repairs at a modest price. I didn't want to waste the time shipping it back and forth just to have them tell me nothing was wrong and replace the trigger because I adjusted it. Fixing the bolt got me to just under 1 MOA. Then, just for giggles, I had a Tubb Shooting Systems firelapping kit. Oh heck, it's not like I'm going to hurt it. I firelapped the barrel. That made the difference - sub 1/2 MOA. The target in my signature below is 6 rounds at 125 yards. The first round is high. then 4 more that I couldn't see in the black so I held on the left edge. I'm not a machinist and only a half fast home gunsmith. I had to do the kind of work that should have been done at the factory. The gun is stock except for the firing pin and spring were replaced with aftermarket and I put one of my Jewell triggers in. Do you think a 7 1/2 pound factory Xmark trigger is too much? It felt like it was full of sand too. In spite of all this, today, it is one of my favorite rifles to shoot.

Sorry for ranting and rambling but Remington needs to look in the mirror. I'll probably not buy their guns again. At least not new. But now I'll go into it knowing what to expect. Those older rifles and shotguns have their issues too but for the most part, that is on the outside. That 870 and the 760 are the smoothest pump actions I have. Age and lots of use may be a factor. That 1963 model 700 has never been to a gunsmith and has the smoothest bolt that locks up square. Those old guns just have lots of character now and they put the first shot on target every time.

If one want's to see how a gun company can turn around, just look at Savage. If someone on here on LRH works for Remington, take this back to your boardroom. They won't care until they learn about losing customers faster than they gain them. They're just looking to turn a profit that beats last quarter.
"It is the duty of the Patriot to protect his Country from its government." ~ Thomas Paine ~

A 'do nothing' Congress is not always a bad thing. If they pass enough laws, it should be entirely possible to sterilize one's complete life experience.

"The 'tolerant' left has come full circle... and has now become what they so despised."
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads for: Remington 700 quality
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Remington Braas Quality or Lack of ? MontanaRifleman Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 34 12-16-2013 12:27 AM
Brass Quality ernierod Reloading 7 02-25-2010 06:49 AM
WTB Quality 300 Win Brass Broz Reloading Equipment and Components 11 01-13-2009 12:50 AM
Remington VSSF factory stock quality Equipment Discussions 12 08-23-2004 12:15 PM
Remington Quality, just how bad is it??? Cotton Mouth The Basics, Starting Out 16 01-23-2004 04:03 AM

Current Poll
How Many Different Cartridges Do You Reload For?
ZERO, all factory ammo - 7.97%
346 Votes
1 - 2.79%
121 Votes
2 or 3 - 14.53%
631 Votes
4 or 5 - 20.35%
884 Votes
6 or 7 - 14.83%
644 Votes
8 or 9 - 8.70%
378 Votes
10 or more - 30.85%
1,340 Vote
Total Votes: 4,344
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC