Oehler Chronographs

[brianwinzor]

I have been using a CED Millenium chronograph for about 5 years, after 30 years of using Oehler, from model 10 up to 33.

I did not notice any difference in velocities recorded by the CED with my field loads, that I had previously chronographed on numerous occasions with the Oehler.

I am using the standard CED 2 foot spacing, but according to the CED manual, they are also available with 4,6,and 8 foot bars. However, I believe the 6, and 8 foot bars will require the use of 2 tripods whereas the 2 and 4 foot one can be mounted on a single tripod.

However, having used a 10 foot spacing on the Oehlers for 30 years, I am not yet completely sold on the 2 foot spacing idea, and am considering moving to a longer bar at some stage.

About 1 year ago, one of the sensors stopped working, and although it was under warranty, I just bought another one (US$23.95) as it was the quickest way and suited my circumstances at the time. The replacement has worked faultlessly since as you would expect.

I have gained the impression that the CED does appear to be slightly more sensitive to low sun angle late in the day than my last Oelher, but it is difficult to be definitive about it.

The CED is quick and easy to set up and appears a sound system, but am not implying that it is the best. Brian.

[7Rumloader]

b1g bOre I was quoting what I read on their site. I would also think that the error % would be reduced with the longer spacing of the sensors. I would love to email them but my new computer wont be ready for shipment until may 25th! I myself am starting to lean more towards the RSI system with all the attachments. Thanks Brian winzor for the comments on how yours works.

[7Rumloader]

Varmint Hunter Oehler sells a carrying case for the 33 that includes spaces for it all up to 4 foot mounting pole. I will look and find it again and let you know. Here is the link link check it out for yourself and see if thats what your looking for.

[Jim Hundley]

Brian,
Am planning to upgrade to the Oehler.I can't decide on the Model 35 or the 35P.I can add the printer to the 35 if needed.I currently have the Chrony unit with a printer that I never use(Printer).I am thinking of getting the whole package which includes a carrying case and stands.Would a good camera tripod be simpler and quicker to set up than the stands?Is the extra $$ for the printer worth it?I am only interested in velocity,ES,SD.(By the way,set my Chrony unit behind an Oehler and the velocity readings were the same,however,the Chrony does strange things when the lighting isn't just right-is the Oehler better?Does the Oehker offer more space under the defusers to shoot?The Chrony has to be exactly square and down the middle).
Thanks for any input.
Jimmy

[Varmint Hunter]

7Rum,

That case is wayyyyyyy to big for my needs. I need something along the lines of a large tackle box or a moderate tool box. I carry the single tripod separate.

Jimmy,

The Oehler is not very picky as to shooting over the exact center of the screens. A 2' unit mounted on a quality camera tri-pod is very easy to set-up. I use an old Bogan tri-pod that I had for years. The head tips, swivels & pans. Best of all is that it has 2 bubble levels built right in. Set-up usually takes just a minute or two.

I always use the included orange diffusers regardless of the prevailing light and have never had a problem. It may even work well without them but they are helpful to have on when aligning the screens with the target.

VH

[harvey]

I have the 35. As usual, it got shot and I went by Dr. Oehler's and his techs GAVE me the parts I needed and checked the unit calibration for free. When you guys are pricing a chronograph, consider warranty, service, and the pleasant, knowelegable folks at Qehler. I am special, but you will be too, when you need service or advice.

harv