Originally Posted by edge
OK, Mr. Derek!
You are the moron that proclaimed that the Accubond failed with ZERO proof!
And you are the one who "bet" that it was me with ZERO proof. Amazing.
How does one prove something that happened years ago, other than deductive reasoning in this case?
Why do you need proof in this case when you wrote that bullets can and do fail? How does one prove anything on an internet forum other than what you have proven to me?
You still didn't read my posts where I have twice now, clearly written, about past mistakes.
Edge, please read this very slowly. I'm very concerned about your ability, but we'll try this one more time. I'll put a lot of spaces b/w the words so you don't get lost. Let me know if you are dyslexic and we can try again:
Bullet hit where I was aiming. Blood visible leaking out from exact point where crosshairs were when trigger broke. Buck traveled long long long distance. Bullet failed.
Now if you simply don't believe me, then grow some balls and just say so. You'd be wrong but what you believe or want to believe is simply up to you. I think we can both live with that.
By the way, I'm not arrogant, and those who know me agree. Those with simple minds refer to people like me as arrogant (hint hint). I'm confident with my hunting. You must not be, otherwise, you'd see the difference.