Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

Muzzle Brake vs. Ported Barrel with a twist

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 07-13-2009, 09:09 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,441
Re: Muzzle Brake vs. Ported Barrel with a twist

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bull45cal. View Post
Mr. Peacock & J E Custom,

Thank you, you two esteemed individuals, for your replies to this thread. I do want to ask further of your opinion concerning this matter. I would like to discuss the effectiveness of the sound deflector. Let me start by saying I’m not an expert in fluid dynamics, so some of my thoughts may not be complete right. With that said, I would purpose that sound deflector (SD) would, of course, reduce the braking effect of the ports. My thought is that I would see a marked and even felt decline, but not a drastic one. I’m leaving a 0.25 inch gap around the barrel for gas flow. With the SD walls being almost 90 degrees from the gas flow (gas coming from the ports), I would expect that a large portion of the force left in the gas would be used in pushing against the SD walls. Then the gas would take the path of least resistance, and flow out the muzzle end. I think the actual back thrust generated in the SD would be small.

Can you explain why you think that ports of this type would be more likely to make the barrel more “handload sensitive” than an equally designed screw on brake?

J E Custom, I definitely will consider the ports in the SD idea you presented.

Again, that you for your input.

There are brakes with holes in the end facing forward (Like the VIAS) and they work well and
they are known to be a little quieter than some others but are not as efficient as other breaks in
reducing recoil.

The principle way the brakes work is that they redirect high velocity gasses to reduce the push
as the bullet leaves the barrel. The more gas that is directed away from the center line of the
bore the more effective it is at reducing recoil.

Some of the most effective brakes have the ports facing slightly backwards. (But they are very
loud) .

Your design will reduce recoil by some margin because you are enlarging the exit hole thus
reducing the gas velocity. And it will be quieter than normal (No Break).

You could do the same thing by drilling or milling the holes/openings at a forward angle.

As to the accuracy, a break can change a rifles accuracy to good or bad with the same load
before the break was added and you may have to start all over with load development.

The main thing is go ahead and build the break and test it and see. if it doesn't do what
you wanted it to try something else. Who knows you may come up with a better mouse trap.

Be Careful

J E CUSTOM
__________________
"PRESS ON"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-14-2009, 08:15 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 73
Re: Muzzle Brake vs. Ported Barrel with a twist

J E Custom

I have also pondered a design similar to what you are talking about, but my concern is that the BATF may not like it. To make a “holes in front” design effective I came to the conclusion that it would need a lot of surface area for the gas to push against. What I ended up with was a four baffle tube with holes in the baffles allowing gas to travel from one chamber to the next. I’m not sure if this design will reduce audible muzzle blast to a level less than it would be without any device, but I suspect it will. With that concern (that it may be labeled a sound suppressor), I decided not to build it yet. This is the progression that has brought me to the design that I posted here.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-14-2009, 10:03 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,441
Re: Muzzle Brake vs. Ported Barrel with a twist

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bull45cal. View Post
J E Custom

I have also pondered a design similar to what you are talking about, but my concern is that the BATF may not like it. To make a “holes in front” design effective I came to the conclusion that it would need a lot of surface area for the gas to push against. What I ended up with was a four baffle tube with holes in the baffles allowing gas to travel from one chamber to the next. I’m not sure if this design will reduce audible muzzle blast to a level less than it would be without any device, but I suspect it will. With that concern (that it may be labeled a sound suppressor), I decided not to build it yet. This is the progression that has brought me to the design that I posted here.
I hear you but maybe I am using the wrong term.

A suppressor does just that . it is designed to suppress the sound buy using baffles and some
type of filler (like Steel wool) to absorb sound.

What you are talking about re-directs the sound away from the shooter so it appears quieter
but in reality it is not much quieter and could not considered a suppressor.

J E CUSTOM
__________________
"PRESS ON"
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-14-2009, 11:06 AM
TAC TAC is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Silverton, Oregon
Posts: 110
Re: Muzzle Brake vs. Ported Barrel with a twist

Why not go with a "clamp on" style muzzle brake? you can buy it or if you're into it build one of your own design. The advantage of a clamp on style brake is you can easily remove it in the field.

Here's a few from AI and one from Pete Lincoln (bottom) who's a member here.

this one has a single chamber and is reported to be very inefficient... but shows the single bolt mounting.


this is their new design.




This is the brake from Pete Lincoln.
http://http://www.webshop.roedale.de/product_info.php?info=p251_Muzzle-Break-C21.html


TAC
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-26-2013, 03:12 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 87
Re: Muzzle Brake vs. Ported Barrel with a twist

Hello everyone,
I have mentioned that a friend of mine is selling me his Savage 116 rifle.
He said the barrel is ported which would help with the recoil.
I've read this thread and a few others and none seem to talk about what i see in the picture of the rifle my friend sent me.



That is taken from the full picture, showing only the end of the barrel.
Anyone have an opinion on what you see ?

Here is the full picture:



I am a bit confused about all this as it doesn't look anything like what you folks have been talking about.
__________________
Words are my Weapon of Choice, Truth is my Shield
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-26-2013, 09:38 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,114
Re: Muzzle Brake vs. Ported Barrel with a twist

If you'll be shooting NRA long range matches at bullseye targets, muzzle breaks are not allowed.

And if it's raining, most of them will shoot less accurate as the rain drops in them deflect bullets.

Note also that the recoil that makes hard kicking rifles hard to shoot happens before the bullet exits the muzzle. It's the back thrust while the bullet goes down the barrel that moves the barrel off where it was pointed when the firing pin fired the round. After the bullet leaves and the jet effect causes most of the recoil, it doesn't matter.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-26-2013, 10:22 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 87
Re: Muzzle Brake vs. Ported Barrel with a twist

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart B View Post
If you'll be shooting NRA long range matches at bullseye targets, muzzle breaks are not allowed.

And if it's raining, most of them will shoot less accurate as the rain drops in them deflect bullets.

Note also that the recoil that makes hard kicking rifles hard to shoot happens before the bullet exits the muzzle. It's the back thrust while the bullet goes down the barrel that moves the barrel off where it was pointed when the firing pin fired the round. After the bullet leaves and the jet effect causes most of the recoil, it doesn't matter.
Bart, I'm in the 'GUNS for DUMMIES' category. And my body is broken down so much, I am not even sure I'll be able to go hunting. So, NO I won't be 'shooting NRA long range matches at bullseye targets' anytime soon ;>}

My friends are encouraging me to join them this hunting season.
I've never owned or shot a gun and I'm 55.
It's not a matter of dislike or liking a ported barrel, regarding this porting on the rifle. My friend says out of the rifles he has, this one would offer the lessor recoil in a caliber able to be used for both deer & elk.
I'm more interested in not having recoil damaging my shoulder any more than it already is. And to be truthful, besides maybe having a nice rack as a trophy.
(If I'm lucky)
I plan on donating all meat to the Meals on Wheels Program in my hometown.
I know I have to have a cert. butcher process it before they can accept the meat but, they have done so much for me and many others I want to return the favor.

If I can fill one of their freezers, simply by going through this effort. The cost of the rifle, recoil pads, Knife, License & some type of Ear Protection, Plus the Processing fees. It will be worth the effort (to me).

There is so much wildlife around here yet, most folks naturally keep it for themselves. That is really the only reason I'm doing any of this.

Thanks for the info though !
__________________
Words are my Weapon of Choice, Truth is my Shield
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Muzzle Brake vs. Ported Barrel with a twist
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Hart SS .30 cal barrel, 11 twist, with muzzle brake smithed by Borden 29" long Wolfdawg Gun Parts - Stocks, Barrels, Actions, etc. 2 08-05-2011 06:08 AM
Ported Barrels/Muzzle Brakes??? Shane Lindsey Long Range Hunting & Shooting 1 09-04-2010 05:20 PM
WTS: Sake TRG 42 Barrel and 42/22 Muzzle Brake ktmhk53 Guns For Sale 7 06-23-2010 10:44 AM
muzzle brake and barrel crown bigtoy302 Gunsmithing 1 08-08-2008 05:54 AM
Muzzle Brake Or Ported Barrel? GSPointer General Discussion 4 11-24-2006 10:56 AM

Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 30.90%
55 Votes
NO - 53.93%
96 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 15.17%
27 Votes
Total Votes: 178
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC