Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics


Reply

Musings on barrel life...

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 03-05-2007, 10:35 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 558
Re: Hummers

dzaw,
WOW you can MUSE like none other. just to add a few of my own thoughts and experiences. about your #1 topic 3groove barrel's eroding more slowly. IMHO this is total crap and propaganda, from what I have seen through a bore scope if you have a high intensity cartridge (like every gun I own except 222Rem and 6mmBR) your throat firecracks before it starts to erode forward. a 3groove is much rougher on a bullet in a firecracked state than a 4,5,6 groove barrel ,so it in reality has a shorter barrel life.
It is a mystery to me why a reputable company like Lilja and to a lesser extent pac-nor continue to make these dinosaurs. before I finish my rant on bad ideas,you mentioned moly-fusion. I tried to give it a chance and a FAIR test, but I know too many people who have tried it and it is another miracle cure with no merit.
The best way to get the most barrel life is to break in properly, clean on a regular basis and dont get it over heated in a dog town.
UB
__________________
Attitude:
It takes 43 muscle's to frown and 17 to smile, but only 3 for proper trigger pull.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-05-2007, 10:51 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 81
Thanks!

Thank you!

I have read quite a lot about moly fusion, and you're the first I've ever seen give it a negative review. I really appreciate your candor, and the timely information! I will be testing it myself, along with some other products in the relatively near future. In my forge, with abrasives, with acids, salt water, and buried in some reloading poeder and lit! I figure if I can quantify and control the factors that cause barrel problems, and test treatments and coatings against those factors, I should have a decent idea on weather or not to put it into my gun!

Yes, 3 grooves are rougher when firecracked, but does it take longer for a similar amount of scale (cracking) to build?

Have you perhapse been able to substantiate the cut vs button rifled argument?

Another thought has occurred to me... In handguns, polygonal rifling is used as opposed to land and groove style and reports are vastly extended barrel life. This is, of course, problematic for rifles for two reasons: 1: at the corners of the polygons there will be some blowby of expanding gasses. 2: the polygonal rifling will warp the shape of the bullet, paerhapse adversely affecting accuracy.

I would think that both problems could be overcome in the following manner: more sides to the polygon, with better dimensional control. Example, typical handgun poygonal riling is octagonal. Why not 12 sides. Sure there are more corners, but they will be substantially smaller. Squeeze the bullet just a little tighter, and you can force the bulletr right into those corners, eliminating the blowby effect. Further, 12 sides is a lot closer to the original round state of the bullet, which, spinning at high RPM's will carry with it an air cusion anyhow. Sort of like why golfballs have dimples, they are actually more aerodynamic because of them! Again, like many of my ideas, dodecagonal rifling in a tube as long as a rifle barrel is a nightmare to engineer! Even if it could be pulled off, it may not be worthwhile anyhow, as without testing (an expensive proposition at best) we have no real way of knowing weather or not it would ruin accuracy all to hell, or even if it would help barrel life much.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-06-2007, 08:04 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 507
Re: Thanks!

G. David Tubb uses Schneider polygon barrels in competition. So I don't think you can say that a polygon barrel cannot be made to shoot accurately.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-06-2007, 09:10 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 81
Re: Thanks!

Wow! Thanks!!

I had no idea that anyone was producing rifle barrels in polygons! I have a lot of reading to do all of a sudden!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-06-2007, 09:17 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,856
Re: Thanks!

I think that cost is the biggest factor in the barrel makers choice of barel steel , 17-4 is a good bit more expensive , granted it will likley last longer but how much? maybe 20% and if the barrel cost 50% more whats the point? I have a barrel made from 17-4 its made by Lothar Walther for BlackStar company then electo polished by them. The 17-4 is a bit harder than 416 but not realy any worse than CM. If you look at the hardness of the SS barrel compaired to CM you will se that the CM is harder but more prone to "fire cracking" and as a side note CM barrels don't have any carbide in them but carbon thats what makes them harder.

As for the land and groove debate , I think that the idea is that the 3 groove barrels have more surface area on the lands to wear so in theory they will not erode away as fast but as mentiond the increased surface area makes for more roungh surface to eat at the bullet.
Their are some very accurate poly barrels out their , like mantioned the barrels that Tubb uses also the H&K PSG-1 noted as being the most accurate semi auto rifle made uses this style rifling

One of these days after I hit the lotto , I'm going to buy a pile of barrels cut riffled poly and buttoned and shoot them all out in the same caliber to get an accurate "truth" about what last longer
__________________
Si Vis Pacem Parabellum
Molon Labe
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-06-2007, 09:35 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 81
Re: Thanks!

"as a side note CM barrels don't have any carbide in them but carbon thats what makes them harder"

I hate to slit hairs, but I feel I must for the sake of accuracy...

CM stands for Chromium and Molybdenum. The chromium content is not nearly as great as in stainless, but it's there. Among other things, it helps push the pearlite nose on the isothermal transformation curve farther off in time, making it more thoroughly hardening, so a uniform hardness can be had throughout the workpeice.

The carbon content IS much greater in CM than in the stainlesses we are used to seeing, but ALL steels have carbon. Steel, by its very definition is the alloy of carbon and iron.

Chromium LOVES carbon, and chromium carbide is the result. Yes stainless barrels have carbides in them. Yes CM barrels have carbides in them. What makes CM barrels harder is nit the carbon content. That makes it ABlE to be harder. What makes it harder is the heat treat.

Bear in mind that different steel alloys display different levels of tougness (which is the opposite of brittleness, and has nothing to do with strength or hardness) at given hardness levels. A CM barrel wears more quickly not because it is harder, but because it lacks chromium in sufficient quantities to resist the chemical action in the erosion process, which happens at a much accellerated rate under heat and pressure.

With equal toughness and equal corrosioin resistance, a harder steel will wear out slower. Or, alternatively, with equal hardness and equal corrosion resistance, a tougher steel will wear more slowly. Finally, (yep, you guessed it) with equal hardness and equal toughness, a more corrosion resistant steel will wear more slowly.

This is why I like the idea of crucible's high purity modified 17-4. With appropriate heat treat It can be tougher, harder, AND more corrosion resistant than 416R

Remember that fully annealed, all of these steels are way too soft to use. Hardness is your friend, so long as it does not compromise other mechanical properties that are critical. Toughness is also your friend, in the same way, as is corrosion resistance.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-06-2007, 01:45 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Great Falls, MT
Posts: 203
Re: Musings on barrel life...

First off I would like to say that I have absolutly no imputs on the barrel life stuff...but I do always like to learn new things and this post/thread is VERY informative; thank you.

Second...ouch, ouch, ouch, my brain is starting to cramp.

I too will re-read this a couple of times just to absorb everything and maybe understand some of it.

Again, thanks for all the great information.
__________________
Genises 27-3: Now therefore take, I pray thee, thy weapons, thy quiver and thy bow, and go out to the field, and take me some venison...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Musings on barrel life...
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
.375 Ruger, musings on use in LRH (long winded) comfisherman Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 6 09-15-2014 10:42 AM
300 WSM Barrel life? mrgreentie Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 1 01-10-2011 08:44 PM
Barrel life on 338 RUM D.Camilleri Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 12 10-15-2010 10:48 PM
Barrel life, 6-284 vs. 6.5-06 AI labrador Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 4 09-02-2005 09:27 AM
Barrel life? Make_mine_a_magnum Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 1 05-06-2003 07:23 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC