Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

Moly Vs. Non-Moly

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-31-2007, 11:18 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Gila Wilderness,New Mexico
Posts: 121
Moly Vs. Non-Moly

Hey Everybody...
As many of you know I am pretty new to this long-range hunting and I have a question regarding bullet coatings.

What are the advantages of Moly Coated bullets?

Once again thank you and have a safe holiday...

Jason
The New Mexico Sportsman
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-31-2007, 12:47 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Utah
Posts: 9
moly coated bullets

The use of molly is still controversal.I have used them in varmit loads and big game loads.if you have a known good load moly will reduce pressure and velocity due to reduced friction in the bore, however if you bump the charge up you can get back the velocity.The usual claim is more shots before cleaning is needed.I have gotten some really great velocity preformance using moly bullets by starting with them and working up as usual and no pressure problems. Cleaning can be an issue!! use them but clean like usual. There will be dark traces on the patch, oil after and use something like KROIL.
OLD BEAR
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:04 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 2,124
If you do a search on any of the shooting/hunting boards you will get more feedback & opinions than you will be able to read during the entire year of 2008.

Personally, I still use moly coated bullets (using the NECO method) on my high volume varmint rigs. I see no reason to use moly coated bullets in my biggame rifles.

Moly is just another variable that a new reloader/shooter can do without. If you are an experiencedd reloader than it may be something new to experiment with. Some guys swear by moly - some guys swear at it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:19 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Gila Wilderness,New Mexico
Posts: 121
I guess my question is does it truly fix a problem? or is just a gimmick?
jason
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-31-2007, 04:41 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Posts: 458
Shooters have been using moly in one form or another, off and on, since about WWI (one), and it's still never really caught on.

I've used a lot of moly bullets; IMHO it just ain't worth the bother.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-31-2007, 04:42 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 2,124
OK - IMO moly will reduce fouling and makes bore cleaning faster and easier.

It is also my opinion that it reduces heat caused by friction.

Moly will reduce stress on thin bullet jackets when using target bullets in fast twist barrels. This could be very important in guns that "dust" bullets just outside of the muzzle.

Moly "may" improve accuracy but an inaccurate rifle will not magically become accurate with moly coated bullets. Accurate loads for moly bullets are generally different than loads for the same bullet w/o moly.

Moly "may" increase velocity at a given pressure but it would take a slight increase in powder charge to get there.

Since the use of moly remains controversial - these are my OPINIONS based on many years of using moly coated bullets.

**Lastly - After using moly coated bullets in many barrels, custom and factory, I have yet to experience and moly build-up or other problems associated with the use of moly that you can read about on the million+ threads devoted to this topic. My guess is that any real problems that may have developed where caused by the shooters who believed that they could shoot several hundred rounds or more without cleaning the bores because their bores and bullets were moly coated.

Last edited by Varmint Hunter; 12-31-2007 at 04:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-31-2007, 07:07 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 1,219
I will point out one problem I had with moly: I didn't know how to use it and how to clean it. I took bad advice and didn't research it enough. Moly attracts moisture and I didn't clean after a hunting season. My bore got a little rust in it. Before the incident, I swore by moly because my group size did reduce when I used it in a factory rifle. But I don't think I will ever use it again.
__________________
I used to re-load but now I "hand-load".
-- Well, at least I try --
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Moly Vs. Non-Moly
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bullets for sale (some Moly and some non-Moly) Lightvarmint Reloading Equipment and Components 6 05-17-2009 12:27 PM
WTB: .30 Cal Sierra 240 MK Moly Joel Russo Reloading Equipment and Components 2 03-21-2009 08:11 AM
22-250 50gr v-max moly camoman80 Reloading 1 02-02-2005 12:42 PM
Using Moly Bullets oneshot976 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 1 12-13-2004 11:26 PM
Moly or Not? Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 8 12-16-2003 11:50 PM

Current Poll
Are you on Facebook?
Yes - 46.39%
1,117 Vote
No - 19.52%
470 Votes
No, but I may join - 1.79%
43 Votes
No way, are you kidding? - 36.05%
868 Votes
Total Votes: 2,408
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC