Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics


Reply

magnum vs. short magnum

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 03-08-2010, 01:09 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: just east of memphis, tn
Posts: 61
Re: magnum vs. short magnum

I shoot a 300wsm and think the recoil is surprisingly mild. this is coming from a fairly heavy rifle but it is considerably less than a lighter 30-06 I used to own. I do have my doubts about there being less felt recoil than a win mag however. if you are shooting more than walking you might want to try a mag or short mag in a heavy rifle. you might be suprised at how pleasant they actually are. for example, I once shot 20 rounds from a model 700 that was pretty light and ended up with a bruised shoulder. I recently put about 30 through a 300 wsm and the last round was as pleasant as the first. the 300 is a winchester model 70 coyote that weighs about 8 1/2 lbs. and still sports the extremely thin factory recoil pad and a muzzle brake could reduce it even more. In the same rifle I'm sure there's a big difference but in the right rifle I've seen small men put lots of rounds down range with no ill effects. if you want to extend your range don't write off the magnums due to recoil alone. there are many ways to make that extremely managable. probably a good bit milder than your 30-06.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-08-2010, 05:06 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,542
Re: magnum vs. short magnum

IMHO I would put recoil aside and pick which one of the 2 cartridges that best meets your primary needs and then second can I bring recoil down to what I feel is a manageable level. I can't see where there's much of a recoil difference between the 2.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-08-2010, 08:02 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 354
Re: magnum vs. short magnum

I'm shooting ten more grains of powder in my 300 Win Mag than my 300WSM.My 300WSM has a short throat and I have to seat the bullets deeper,so this also uses up powder space.My 300 Win Mag on the other hand,has a very long throat and I have to seat the bullets out much farther and this also increases powder capacity.So the question "Are they equal?"I say "No".The 300 WSM is the most efficient of the two,but the 300 Win Mag is going to beat it,especially with heavier weight bullets.As far as recoil goes,if I'm shooting ten more grains of powder in the same type of rifle,I'm going to notice it and I do.I feel they are what they are,like the 308 is not a 30-06.What I noticed is,I load the same powder charge in my 300WSM with 165gr bullets that I load for my 7mag with 150gr bullets and I load the same charge in my 300 Win. Mag with 165gr bullets that I load for my 7STW with 150gr bullets.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: magnum vs. short magnum
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
7mm Ackley Short Magnum Ryan55555 Long Range Hunting & Shooting 1 11-09-2010 09:45 PM
Reloading 300 Winchester Short Magnum JJ Division Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 6 02-24-2009 07:06 AM
Short action Magnum jmason Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 14 11-23-2008 09:59 PM
Sendero in 7mm Short Magnum? Make_mine_a_magnum Long Range Hunting & Shooting 5 05-14-2003 06:38 AM
Short Action Magnum cartridges Marc Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 0 11-30-2001 03:21 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC