close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics

Reply

LoadBase? Miller or Greenhill Method?

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 12-24-2009, 10:08 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 297
LoadBase? Miller or Greenhill Method?

I'm wondering about something in the Twist and Stability section of the Analyzer tab in LoadBase. When I check the stability of my pet .308 round, the Miller method says under stabilized and the Greenhill method says fully stabilized. Since the particular round that I am checking shoots 1.4-ish groups at 300 yards my guess is that the Greenhill method is the one to trust. However... I haven't guessed right yet when it comes to ballistics... so I figured that I would ask.
__________________
Glock Certified Armorer
GSSF Member
Reply With Quote
  •   #2  
    Unread 12-24-2009, 10:24 AM
    Official LRH Sponsor
     
    Join Date: Mar 2007
    Posts: 633
    Re: LoadBase? Miller or Greenhill Method?

    Unless your bullet is a round nose, flat base bullet with a muzzle velocity of ~1400 fps or less, the Greenhill formula is not the one to use.

    The Miller formula is tailored for modern bullets at high velocities and will give much better stability predictions than Greenhill.

    Having said that, if all your inputs are right and it suggests you're 'understabilized' for the bullets you shoot great groups with, the following are things to think about:

    1) The formula isn't 100% perfect.
    2) The thresh-hold for a 'safe' margin of stability is subjective. Some say a stability factor of 1.5 is required, some say 1.3. I go with 1.4.
    3) Your barrel may have a faster twist than you think.
    4) Are you shooting at high altitude, and is this reflected in the stability calculation you did?

    Just some thoughts that might rectify the calculations and observations.

    -Bryan
    Reply With Quote

      #3  
    Unread 12-24-2009, 10:39 AM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2003
    Location: Texas
    Posts: 297
    Re: LoadBase? Miller or Greenhill Method?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by bsl135 View Post
    Unless your bullet is a round nose, flat base bullet with a muzzle velocity of ~1400 fps or less, the Greenhill formula is not the one to use.

    The Miller formula is tailored for modern bullets at high velocities and will give much better stability predictions than Greenhill.

    Having said that, if all your inputs are right and it suggests you're 'understabilized' for the bullets you shoot great groups with, the following are things to think about:

    1) The formula isn't 100% perfect.
    2) The thresh-hold for a 'safe' margin of stability is subjective. Some say a stability factor of 1.5 is required, some say 1.3. I go with 1.4.
    3) Your barrel may have a faster twist than you think.
    4) Are you shooting at high altitude, and is this reflected in the stability calculation you did?

    Just some thoughts that might rectify the calculations and observations.

    -Bryan
    Have you ever heard the term "garbage in - garbage out"? I can't believe what I did. I'll bet I checked the input 10 times and each time I thought "I need to go measure the length of the bullet. 1.3" seems a tad long."

    The bullet length was wrong in the program. The 150gr Sierra Pro-Hunter (.308) (at least the one that I mic'd) is 1.07" not 1.3" which is apparently the program default. Both Miller and Greenhill say over stabilized now (2.26 and 2.46 respectively).

    Now that that's over I can play with the 168gr Berber VLD numbers

    Thanks Bryan
    __________________
    Glock Certified Armorer
    GSSF Member
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes


    Similar Threads for: LoadBase? Miller or Greenhill Method?
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    Loadbase 3.0? WoodWraith Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 6 09-19-2010 01:38 AM
    Loadbase or Exbal? quietmike Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 26 01-02-2010 06:13 PM
    LoadBase 3.0 question Mike6158 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 4 12-22-2009 11:18 AM
    LoadBase 3.0 PPC Report jmason Long Range Hunting & Shooting 5 07-27-2009 07:35 AM
    LoadBase 2.0 Question woolecox Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 7 07-04-2009 12:56 PM


    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC