Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

LoadBase? Miller or Greenhill Method?

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-24-2009, 10:08 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 295
LoadBase? Miller or Greenhill Method?

I'm wondering about something in the Twist and Stability section of the Analyzer tab in LoadBase. When I check the stability of my pet .308 round, the Miller method says under stabilized and the Greenhill method says fully stabilized. Since the particular round that I am checking shoots 1.4-ish groups at 300 yards my guess is that the Greenhill method is the one to trust. However... I haven't guessed right yet when it comes to ballistics... so I figured that I would ask.
__________________
Glock Certified Armorer
GSSF Member
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 12-24-2009, 10:24 AM
SPONSOR
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 521
Re: LoadBase? Miller or Greenhill Method?

Unless your bullet is a round nose, flat base bullet with a muzzle velocity of ~1400 fps or less, the Greenhill formula is not the one to use.

The Miller formula is tailored for modern bullets at high velocities and will give much better stability predictions than Greenhill.

Having said that, if all your inputs are right and it suggests you're 'understabilized' for the bullets you shoot great groups with, the following are things to think about:

1) The formula isn't 100% perfect.
2) The thresh-hold for a 'safe' margin of stability is subjective. Some say a stability factor of 1.5 is required, some say 1.3. I go with 1.4.
3) Your barrel may have a faster twist than you think.
4) Are you shooting at high altitude, and is this reflected in the stability calculation you did?

Just some thoughts that might rectify the calculations and observations.

-Bryan
__________________
Bryan Litz
Ballistician

Author of: Applied Ballistics for Long Range Shooting
And: Accuracy and Precision for Long Range Shooting

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-24-2009, 10:39 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 295
Re: LoadBase? Miller or Greenhill Method?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bsl135 View Post
Unless your bullet is a round nose, flat base bullet with a muzzle velocity of ~1400 fps or less, the Greenhill formula is not the one to use.

The Miller formula is tailored for modern bullets at high velocities and will give much better stability predictions than Greenhill.

Having said that, if all your inputs are right and it suggests you're 'understabilized' for the bullets you shoot great groups with, the following are things to think about:

1) The formula isn't 100% perfect.
2) The thresh-hold for a 'safe' margin of stability is subjective. Some say a stability factor of 1.5 is required, some say 1.3. I go with 1.4.
3) Your barrel may have a faster twist than you think.
4) Are you shooting at high altitude, and is this reflected in the stability calculation you did?

Just some thoughts that might rectify the calculations and observations.

-Bryan
Have you ever heard the term "garbage in - garbage out"? I can't believe what I did. I'll bet I checked the input 10 times and each time I thought "I need to go measure the length of the bullet. 1.3" seems a tad long."

The bullet length was wrong in the program. The 150gr Sierra Pro-Hunter (.308) (at least the one that I mic'd) is 1.07" not 1.3" which is apparently the program default. Both Miller and Greenhill say over stabilized now (2.26 and 2.46 respectively).

Now that that's over I can play with the 168gr Berber VLD numbers

Thanks Bryan
__________________
Glock Certified Armorer
GSSF Member
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: LoadBase? Miller or Greenhill Method?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Loadbase 3.0? WoodWraith Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 6 09-19-2010 01:38 AM
Loadbase or Exbal? quietmike Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 26 01-02-2010 06:13 PM
LoadBase 3.0 question Mike6158 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 4 12-22-2009 11:18 AM
LoadBase 3.0 PPC Report jmason Long Range Hunting & Shooting 5 07-27-2009 07:35 AM
LoadBase 2.0 Question woolecox Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 7 07-04-2009 12:56 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC