  | INTRODUCING Accubond Long Range |
|

11-01-2012, 10:23 PM
|
|
Platinum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The rifle range, or archery range or behind the computer in Alaska
Posts: 3,157
|
|
|
Re: INTRODUCING Accubond Long Range
We all know they are inflated. We are excited because we can have a bullet that will hold up on a 30 yard shot into a moose's shoulder AND be effective at 1k+ yards on the next moose. While inflated, are obviously an improvement.
__________________
Limits are only perceived by what has previously been achieved. Push the limits and good things will happen.
Go the distance or go home
Follow through matters. SEE THE FIRE!!!
August 2011 dall sheep: SUCCESSFULL!!
August 2011 Caribou: Caribou: 1, Michael: 0
September 2011 muzzleloader bull elk: SUCCESSFULL!!
It's BEEN a GREAT year!
|

11-01-2012, 10:31 PM
|
|
Platinum Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,877
|
|
|
Re: INTRODUCING Accubond Long Range
10-4
We had a pretty good idea and expectation of inflated BC values.  Most of us are probably hoping the true BC values will be improved over the standard Accubonds and provide a reasonably good LRH bonded bullet.
|

11-02-2012, 12:33 AM
|
|
Silver Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Alaska
Posts: 176
|
|
|
Re: INTRODUCING Accubond Long Range
I "tested" a .338 cal 300 gr Accubond exiting the muzzle at 2900 fps and slamming through a bull moose at 30 yards (Sept. 2012) the bullet was not recovered but the end result was phenomenal performance that hella impressed me, the vitals were jellied with a fist sized exit hole causing massive blood loss and instantaneous (and even immediate) death occured !!!!
( no I don't work for Nosler, ... just a lowly carpenter from Alaska, haha )
I would not hesitate using an Accubond at "hair" range on a large pissed of brownie, something I would never attempt to do with any Berger or Sierra bullet regardless of caliber or weight, and that's not dissing those bullets.. "just facts as I see them"
Regardless of the high bc claims I see a home for the 6.5mm bullets in my wildcat 6.5 PRO, sending the new Accubond at 3700+ fps will be awesome, and (hopefully, NOSLER !!) a 140 gr at 3600 fps , then again personally I'd rather have Nosler make a heavier 150-160 gr 6.5mm Accubond, now THAT would be fantastic !
the bullet I would really like to see is a Swift A Frame in a Scirrocco profile
__________________
"Fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity"
Sigmund Freud
|

11-02-2012, 03:22 AM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 10
|
|
|
Re: INTRODUCING Accubond Long Range
"Designed with an optimum performance window ranging from 3,200fps to 1,300fps"
"AccuBondŽ-LR allow it to expand rapidly for effective energy transfer and significant tissue damage while retaining sufficient weight to ensure deep penetration into the vitals."
Two of the more significant quotes from the release IMO. I like the lower velocity for reliable expansion. Aren't the Berger VLD's advertised at a minimum velocity of 1600 for reliable expansion?
I think this bullet helps solve my disgust of wasting meat using a typical LR bullet should the target happen to step out at close range....while still giving adequate performance downrange as well!
|

11-02-2012, 09:01 AM
|
|
Platinum Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The cold part of Montana
Posts: 1,299
|
|
|
Re: INTRODUCING Accubond Long Range
Quote:
Originally Posted by shoots_5
"Designed with an optimum performance window ranging from 3,200fps to 1,300fps"
"AccuBondŽ-LR allow it to expand rapidly for effective energy transfer and significant tissue damage while retaining sufficient weight to ensure deep penetration into the vitals."
|
I'm sure interested, whether or not I try to use em is going to depend more on bullet to bullet consistency, Guess Berger and Matrix kinda spoiled me that way
Quote:
|
Two of the more significant quotes from the release IMO. I like the lower velocity for reliable expansion. Aren't the Berger VLD's advertised at a minimum velocity of 1600 for reliable expansion?
|
Thats a recommendation, ask Broz what his impact vel was at 1285 with 215gr hybrids, which are the target bullets with the thicker jacket, not the hunting bullets
Quote:
|
I think this bullet helps solve my disgust of wasting meat using a typical LR bullet should the target happen to step out at close range....while still giving adequate performance downrange as well!
|
Thats my only concern with using Bergers, I'm sure the LRAB with prove to be a very good bullet, maybe shed a little more weight that the traditional AB, but I think the concept will be a nice compliment to the VLD type bullets.
__________________
Keep in mind the animals we shoot for food and display are not bullet proof. Contrary to popular belief, they bleed and die just like they did a hundred years ago. Being competent with a given rifle is far more important than impressive ballistics and poor shootability. High velocity misses never put a steak in the freezer.
Joe
|

11-02-2012, 09:28 AM
|
|
Platinum Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 6,315
|
|
|
Re: INTRODUCING Accubond Long Range
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe King
Thats a recommendation, ask Broz what his impact vel was at 1285 with 215gr hybrids, which are the target bullets with the thicker jacket, not the hunting bullets.
|
The impact velocity from my 300 win at 4100 ft. ALS was about 1670 for the 215 Berger Hybrid. .308" entrance and about a 1 1/4" exit.
Looking at this and the 1285 yard shot from my 300 win I can't really see why we need a expansion rating down to 1300 fps. That would put me out to about 1700 yards. Unless we are going to load these up is something like a 308.
Jeff
__________________
|
  |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|