Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

ICAO or Army BCs data ??

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-27-2005, 08:02 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 131
ICAO or Army BCs data ??

To produce accurate results, we all know that the atmposhere used shoulod be ICAO or Army (Standard), but we must couple the correct BC for the conditions. That is to match the BC to the conditions used.

So, does anyone know how to find the model used by the bullets manufacturers when they publish their BCs values?? In short, how do we know if they are ICAO or Army based??
__________________
regards, Gus

LoadBaseŠ Desktop & Mobile editions - the ballistics/reloading software solution
http://www.patagoniaballistics.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-27-2005, 03:57 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 878
Re: ICAO or Army BCs data ??

Sierra uses Metro for theirs. Im not sure about the others, and im not sure they all use the same one. Lost river ballistics for instance speciffically uses a different atmospheric standard. This would make their BC's appear higher than their competitors... provided you didn't know better. You could get a .6bc out of a pistol bullet if you could do your "testing and measuring" at a high enough altitude/low air pressure.


smacks forehead repeatidly....gotta edit these before posting
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-27-2005, 04:21 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 126
Re: ICAO or Army BCs data ??

Mostly army - better for advertisement as it gives higher bc.

The Army Standard Metro atmosphere, now used only in ballistics, defines sea-level conditions as 750.000 mmHg of pressure (29.5275 inHg, 99.9918 kPa), 59 °F (15 °C), and 78% humidity. (Ref: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, U.S. Army Aberdeen Proving Ground)

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standar...e_and_pressure

How's the shooting in Argentina?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-27-2005, 04:50 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC, oceanfront
Posts: 3,164
Re: ICAO or Army BCs data ??

According to Lija, standard Metro conditions are used by Sierra and Hornady bullets. Speer Bullets and Nosler Bullets have used the International Civil Aviation Organization, (ICAO),
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-27-2005, 06:30 PM
JBM JBM is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 113
Re: ICAO or Army BCs data ??

[ QUOTE ]
You could get a .6bc out of a pistol bullet if you could do your "testing and measuring" at a high enough altitude/low air pressure.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't understand this at all. When measuring the BC, the density is not part of the BC -- it is a separate term. The only question is how different are the densities and mach numbers for the two different standards. At sea level, there is about 1% difference, less than the accuracy of the measured BC.
__________________
JBM Small Arms Ballistics -- http://www.eskimo.com/~jbm
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-27-2005, 07:29 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC, oceanfront
Posts: 3,164
Re: ICAO or Army BCs data ??

There isn't alot of difference between the SL standards. But I believe the idea expressed with the pistol bullet related to those bullet makers who imply BC without regard to appples/apples conditions.
For example, there is nothing preventing Berger from reporting local BC obtained at 5000' and Mach3(without mention of that). We would buy their bullets assuming initially that BC was obtained under std SL conditions, and seeing what appears as an advantage. Afterall, Berger does not provide any basis that I'm aware of for their numbers. Not even mach#.
There are alot of bullets to choose from, and BC is very important at long range. Unfortunately, there isn't an independant body to report BC based on a single standard. Except that published from the gov't(.308s).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-27-2005, 07:32 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: utah
Posts: 302
Re: ICAO or Army BCs data ??

Gustavo,
this is very interesting , but when it comes to reality you can sort through some of this fecal matter by just shooting through your chronograph at various ranges and use a good ballistic program (Sierra,xbal etc).
if you are really trying to figure out what the military is doing. J-Hole,ICAO,or the Army aint tellin you or me the truth (National Security).
spend a day or two at the range with a good Chronograph and you can have your answers.
B
p.s.please use an oehler (chronograph)to save un expected drama at the range.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: ICAO or Army BCs data ??
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Army going to 300 Win Mag for LRH silvertip-co Long Range Hunting & Shooting 39 12-19-2012 11:46 AM
M855A1 New Kit up for Army Ammo 436 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 3 05-22-2011 10:36 PM
The Army is looking for a rifle to replace the m16 94Winchester General Discussion 35 02-11-2011 07:41 PM
signed with the army today remingtonman_25_06 General Discussion 29 04-14-2006 06:42 PM
ARMY Charles A General Discussion 4 08-05-2002 12:15 AM

Current Poll
Are you on Facebook?
Yes - 46.63%
1,092 Vote
No - 19.21%
450 Votes
No, but I may join - 1.75%
41 Votes
No way, are you kidding? - 36.12%
846 Votes
Total Votes: 2,342
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC