LongRangeHunting.com


Go Back   LongRangeHunting.com > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics



Welcome to LongRangeHunting.com!
welcome message

Reply

The great 260 bullet weight debate

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-16-2009, 05:57 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: honeoye falls ny
Posts: 682
The great 260 bullet weight debate

Ok lets say you have a 260 rem with a 27" 1-8 twist barrel and wayetts box mag.

Now you want to shoot the JLK 6.5mm bullet do you pick the 140g bullet with the BC of .630 or the 130g bullet with the BC of .620??

You could get a littel more speed if you went with the 130g over the 140g but is it worth the loss of energy at lets say 1000 yds?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-16-2009, 06:10 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,660
Re: The great 260 bullet weight debate

Quote:
Originally Posted by ICANHITHIMMAN View Post
Ok lets say you have a 260 rem with a 27" 1-8 twist barrel and wayetts box mag.

Now you want to shoot the JLK 6.5mm bullet do you pick the 140g bullet with the BC of .630 or the 130g bullet with the BC of .620??

You could get a littel more speed if you went with the 130g over the 140g but is it worth the loss of energy at lets say 1000 yds?
Plug your info into this calculator:

http://www.eskimo.com/~jbm/calculations/traj/traj.html
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-16-2009, 06:46 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 216
Re: The great 260 bullet weight debate

Depends if those BCs are actually correct

Probably the 130 but I haven't run the numbers.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-16-2009, 07:34 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: honeoye falls ny
Posts: 682
Re: The great 260 bullet weight debate

hay thanks for the link its a little vexing at first but I will work through it. They are the BC listed on the JLK site by Swampy.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-16-2009, 09:36 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 9
Re: The great 260 bullet weight debate

OKAY- what do you want to shoot at, targets or critters? Since the BC's are so close, they are going to buck the wind pretty closely.
Now since the 130 is going to outperform in velocity, it's going to have a flatter trajectory. You start getting out too 1000+ yards the 140's BC advantage and weight will take over and it will start to outshoot the 130, IMOP that is.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-16-2009, 10:03 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: honeoye falls ny
Posts: 682
Re: The great 260 bullet weight debate

highdrum thats a good opnion I like it well said its for critters of course. My first choice was the 140 and still is but the 130 is so close BC wise I just got excited over the slight edge in veloicty.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-16-2009, 10:58 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The rifle range, or archery range or behind the computer in Alaska
Posts: 2,348
Re: The great 260 bullet weight debate

With bullets that similar, I would use the one my rifle liked best at the velocity it liked best.

Dont complicate the matter, let the rifle speak. You just have to listen.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: The great 260 bullet weight debate
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
.243 bullet weight 100 or 110 gr. chris matthews Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 13 04-20-2009 03:34 AM
Bullet Weight For 22-150 Micheal326 Varmint Hunting 15 11-12-2008 10:19 PM
.243 bullet weight rtv900 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 5 10-06-2008 08:58 AM
The great "brake" debate...which works best? Dan B The Basics, Starting Out 7 12-23-2007 03:18 PM
Bullet debate Randy in Va Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 1 07-22-2003 07:57 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2009 LenBackus.net, LLC