Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

Does the 5.56x57 (22-06) cartridge exist?

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #22  
Old 08-21-2013, 04:56 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 200
Re: Does the 5.56x57 (22-06) cartridge exist?

I just finished a 22-284 build, 1-9 twist. Before load development I searched for any data I could find and have collected several pages of loads from shooters. When I did start range testing an accurate load was found with the first (H1000) powder I tried.

An interesting article was printed in "Guns & Ammo" August 1964 by Bob Hutton titled "6000fps worlds hottest .22" fun to read and good load data too!
Attached Thumbnails - Click to View Larger
Does the 5.56x57 (22-06) cartridge exist?-100_3039.jpg  
__________________
Bob the nailer
one ragged hole...the quest for accuracy continues.

NRA Life member
Varmint Hunter Association member
American Gunsmith Association
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-21-2013, 05:03 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 842
Re: Does the 5.56x57 (22-06) cartridge exist?

That's COOOOOOOOOOL!!!!!!! I'm betting that rifle will be fun to shoot!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-21-2013, 05:18 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 842
Re: Does the 5.56x57 (22-06) cartridge exist?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Heat View Post
I think what threw me was that the back powder era had transformed into [what I thought was] the "water" era, after smokeless powder took over. By that I mean that smokeless powders are typically very simiar to water (1.0), in terms of their density. Case "capacity" actually IS measured that way in modern times. But that sounds like a recipe for a mix-up right there.


-steve
I believe this is another area that is confusing you. Water is used to measure case volume because it takes the shape of the container. Measuring case volume by filling the case with water and re-weighing the case allows a consistent and useful basis for comparing the case capacity of different brands of brass and different chamberings.

Water capacity in grains does not directly translate to powder capacity. It is used solely as a means of volumetric comparison.

Different smokeless powders have different bulk densities, meaning that the same weight of powder takes up a different amount of volume depending on powder type. Generally speaking, slower powders will take up more volume versus their weight in grains. Ball powders will typically provide greater load densities (case fill) than an equivalent extruded powder.

As an illustration of the effects of powder bulk density, pour 45 grains of H4350 into a .308 case. Then, try doing the same thing with 45 grains of Trail Boss.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Where in the US do you live?
West of the Mississippi River - 60.79%
896 Votes
East of the Mississippi River - 36.91%
544 Votes
On the Mississippi River on a houseboat - 2.31%
34 Votes
Total Votes: 1,474
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC