Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

Does the 5.56x57 (22-06) cartridge exist?

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 08-18-2013, 02:01 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,340
Re: Does the 5.56x57 (22-06) cartridge exist?

Sentimental favorite .224 Clark. There are others very close, so i won't say it's the hottest or newest, but he was doing with his own bullets, before most.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-18-2013, 11:03 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Remington County, PA
Posts: 383
Re: Does the 5.56x57 (22-06) cartridge exist?

Hmm, I thought the 30 carbine (kalashnikov, or is it kalishnakov?) was 7.62x39, the .308 was 7.62x51, and the 30-06 was 7.62x57. But according to chuck hawk, the 30-06 is about 10 grains more than that. And the x57 round does appear to be the 7.21x57 (7mmx57) mouser case. Maybe THAT be the .284 case you refer to with the 22-284? I have decided to put this on the back burner and concentrate on getting some maximum barrel into my ultra 7 for now, anyways.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-19-2013, 09:58 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: greenwood, IN
Posts: 3,577
Re: Does the 5.56x57 (22-06) cartridge exist?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Heat View Post
Hmm, I thought the 30 carbine (kalashnikov, or is it kalishnakov?) was 7.62x39, the .308 was 7.62x51, and the 30-06 was 7.62x57. But according to chuck hawk, the 30-06 is about 10 grains more than that. And the x57 round does appear to be the 7.21x57 (7mmx57) mouser case. Maybe THAT be the .284 case you refer to with the 22-284? I have decided to put this on the back burner and concentrate on getting some maximum barrel into my ultra 7 for now, anyways.
you have to go back to the very late 19th century to see that Paul Mauser came out with a 12mm (head diameter) case that was 57mm long. Later Springfield stretched that same case length to 64mm. This same case has been stretched and also shortened by other folks later. I think the 6BR is the shortest, and maybe the 270 Winchester is the longest version (or 280?). To the best of my knowledge the 7.92x57 Mauser case started it all in that case family.

Seven millimeter wise there are a gazillion of them! All the way from the 7mm TCU to
the 7mm Ultra mag. Efficiency wise the 7mm TCU is probably the best followed closely by the 7BR. After you get past the 280's and 7mm Remington mag (and Weatherby) you start to see serious diminishing returns for the efforts involved. The .284 is a good round, but the .280 is much better. Parker Ackley really like the basic 7mm Remington mag case as well as the 7mm Weatherby mag. Then you also have the 7mm WSM case that fits in most short actions nicely. Ackley felt the case capacity of the 7mm Remington mag to be about the max the bore could use unless you were shooting very heavy bullets. Then the Weatherby would take over. Yet both are only a fraction faster than the plain jane .280! The 57mm case length has gone thru various steps all the way out to .338, and probably .358 if I really looked hard. The 7x57 Ackley improved is well known as a great round that is only slightly slower than the .280, but uses a lot less powder. The .257AI necked up to 7mm is simply the 7x57 improved (or vise versa). I'm seriously thinking about the same round in 30 caliber. Ought to flat smoke the .308 in every way. My idea is to build a stretched .300 Savage, but with the .010" taper that Ackley used with the 30 degree shoulder that Savage used.
gary
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-19-2013, 10:13 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Green River, Wyoming
Posts: 359
Re: Does the 5.56x57 (22-06) cartridge exist?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FEENIX View Post
Here's a little badazz ferya ...

.50 BMG necked down to .22 | The Firearm Blog
Now that's awesome!!!
__________________


-The flexibility of your adaptability is the true measure of your intelligence-
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-19-2013, 11:54 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 5,695
Re: Does the 5.56x57 (22-06) cartridge exist?

I'm working on designing a .22 calber wildcat right now, just for shoots and giggles. I don't know how well it would work, but I can drop a few hints...It WILL be based off a pretty well-modified '06 case (standard bolt face) and if it ever comes to be, it will be tested out of a 26" barrel. It will probably be a barrel burner... But I think it would be one NASTY coyote caliber with the +77 grain bullets.

I'm currently waiting to get back specs for it from the guy who does my QuickDesign cartridge drawings for me.

I need to just invest in QuickDesign...
__________________
"I'm just a peckerwood who lives in the hills with too many guns..." - Bob Lee Swagger

"Give me a minute...I'm good. Give me an hour...I'm great. Give me 6 months...And I'm unbeatable." - Col. Hannibal Smith

Ignore everything I say, because I have a reading comprehension and memory problem...

Quote:
Originally Posted by WildRose View Post
The 284 is to the STW what a tricycle is to a Ninja.

Last edited by MudRunner2005; 08-19-2013 at 12:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-19-2013, 12:19 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Norway, Buskerud
Posts: 333
Re: Does the 5.56x57 (22-06) cartridge exist?

Yes, that cartridge still exists! Mostly used in Germany and Austria for hunting roebuck and varmint. Both as "normal" version called 5,6 x 57 and as rimmed version 5,6 x 57 R. It's a lovely cartridge with high velocity and nice trajectory and still in production (RWS).
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-19-2013, 06:11 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Remington County, PA
Posts: 383
Re: Does the 5.56x57 (22-06) cartridge exist?

I'm still confused on whether the "x 57" number indicates length or grainage capacity. It almost look like it exists in BOTH realms. TMF's explanation doesn't seem to clear anything.either. I'm getting so confused by it all that I'm starting to pick up a headache!

Hey MR05, make sure you keep us filled in on what's going on with your project. It is very intersting.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 31.86%
65 Votes
NO - 51.96%
106 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 16.18%
33 Votes
Total Votes: 204
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC