Originally Posted by FEENIX
There you go assuming again!
OPs on both thread asked the following ...
... hoping for an honest answer that meets their budget and level of experience for their intended use. Instead, you try wow everybody else with your I am better than you attitude and insist that your way and set up is the only way.
Get off your high chair and help the OPs like everyone else is trying to do.
Within your above post lies the difference between you're Patrolling and control efforts, and my posts. Your posts constitute an effort to constrain and impose control over others posting their thoughts, methods, and opinions. Which is how you've earned user name, Marshall FEENIX
. Earlier in this thread you misrepresented the questions, purpose, scope, and intent of the OP, in the effort to justify your imposition of limits/controls on my posts. Methods, experiences, approaches, and statements about chronographs you disapprove of.
Me? I've encouraged you to provide more hep. No effort to control your expression of ideas on the subject of chronographs. You like cheap chronographs. Good for you. I helped reaffirm your expressed preference for low cost chronographs. And D.ID doesn't like chronographs at all. Good for him. My posts never attempted to silence you or D.ID.
I admit I've given you the recognition and credit you deserve for being unable to restrain yourself. First the efforts to contain and control. Failing there, resorting to name calling. Lastly, the nuclear option - Bugs Bunny funnies. What..., no more pics?