Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

Chrony vs BC

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-15-2010, 04:19 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 83
Chrony vs BC

Like to get opinions on which is more believable. Just got back from testing the 160 accubonds in my 7mm. Chronograph by Chrony at 6000ft showed 3125 average velocity. Based on drop from 200 to 800 yds - that would produce a BC of .6, which is substantially higher than the published 0.531. Have others found the BC on that bullet to be in that range ---- or is it more likely that the bullet is actually going more like 3200 and the Chrony is off?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-15-2010, 04:57 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern Id.
Posts: 3,314
Re: Chrony vs BC

Quote:
Originally Posted by 284stak View Post
Like to get opinions on which is more believable. Just got back from testing the 160 accubonds in my 7mm. Chronograph by Chrony at 6000ft showed 3125 average velocity. Based on drop from 200 to 800 yds - that would produce a BC of .6, which is substantially higher than the published 0.531. Have others found the BC on that bullet to be in that range ---- or is it more likely that the bullet is actually going more like 3200 and the Chrony is off?
There is definitely no way that a 160 gr. AB has a b.c. of .6! i would say either the chrony (most likely) or a math problem?......Rich
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-15-2010, 07:35 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC, oceanfront
Posts: 3,171
Re: Chrony vs BC

+1 elkaholic
Also bullet BCs are based on sea level standards(not 6Kft). So having higher local BC at higher elevations(lower air density) is not a surprise really.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2010, 08:28 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 23
Re: Chrony vs BC

Had a similar discussion with a colleague ... having read the Sierra process for determining BC by firing, including the impact of altitude all was set ... until he realised it would be his chrony as the 2nd unit out at the target end of things. Seems the project is on hold and he uses the BC on the box - for better for worse.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-16-2010, 10:19 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sedalia, MO
Posts: 1,253
Re: Chrony vs BC

A quick comment about Sierra's BC firings; they do indeed use two chronographs, but only three screens. Both chronos are set up with S-1 as being the "start" screen, and the second and third screens (S-2 and S-3) being the "stop" screens for the two chronographs, resepctively. Bill McDonald and I have had many a long chat about this and this is his preferred method of doing it to eliminate errors caused by idiosyncracies of the individual chronos involved. I also used another setup involving two chronos with four screens, which was much faster and easier to set up. Bill eventually signed off on this route, but the BCs have been derived using both methods. I have no idea if they've changed anything in the past few years, but that's how it was done in the past.

The risks of using two seperate chronographs comes down to the errors inherent in complicating a system; more potential measuring errors, set-up errors, cycle errors in the units themselves, etc.. Best advice I can give here, is measure everything to the best degree possible, and then remeasure to verify it all over again. Distances need to be precise for the numbers to come out accurately (remember GIGO -"Garbage In, Garbage Out"). Also, make sure you know your atmospherics and apply the appropriate corrections. Hope this helps.
__________________
Kevin Thomas
Lapua USA
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-16-2010, 10:40 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lake Fork, ID
Posts: 271
Re: Chrony vs BC

I have the same thing going on with my 7 and 168 bergers. I went with the chrono speeds and kept adjusting my BC (on my drop charts) to match my actual drop. Turned out to be a BC of .68. I have truthed it out to 1300 yds and everywhere in between. I imagine some barrells smooth a bullet while other barrells rough em up. I always wonder though if my Chrony is spitting out incorrect numbers.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Chrony vs BC
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chrony adam330 Trade, Freebie and Loan 9 08-05-2011 03:28 PM
Chrony - help tlk Reloading 6 09-23-2010 10:50 AM
WTB: Chrony Miller Outdoors Other Stuff For Sale 5 05-02-2010 08:17 AM
Chrony??? noneck180 Equipment Discussions 0 09-20-2009 03:03 PM
what chrony outdooraddict Long Range Hunting & Shooting 13 01-30-2008 11:31 PM

Current Poll
How Many Different Cartridges Do You Reload For?
ZERO, all factory ammo - 8.02%
352 Votes
1 - 2.78%
122 Votes
2 or 3 - 14.56%
639 Votes
4 or 5 - 20.35%
893 Votes
6 or 7 - 14.83%
651 Votes
8 or 9 - 8.66%
380 Votes
10 or more - 30.80%
1,352 Vote
Total Votes: 4,389
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC