Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

Chrono VS Shooting

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-31-2012, 02:56 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Vandergrift PA
Posts: 1,198
Chrono VS Shooting

Has anyone ever seen a large distance between what the chrono says and a computer drop chart and Verifying at the range?? I checked my speed and used my program but the range result was very different shows I should be a lot faster?? I have never had the two be far apart is this normal or is the chrono wrong? I used two different chrono's though so I don't see how that could be it.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-31-2012, 07:33 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Blackfoot, Idaho
Posts: 8,090
Re: Chrono VS Shooting

Here's your choices:

A. Use the chrono readings to create the drop chart and don't worry about actual drops.

B. Forget the chrono and develop the drop chart by shooting @ several ranges out to the maximum range.

Which of the above will result in successful harvest of more game? Yep, you guessed it!

One of my rifles chronos @ 3440 FPS but Shooter to make the drops hit the targets says to use 3040 FPS. And no I don't have it figured. It just works.

Oh, and this is with a second barrel on the rifle which with the original bbl and same custom bullets used the same bc and the chrono reading of 3440.

Can barrels change bc that much???

I use the chrono for ES and SD only and that is trumped by watching vertical dispersion at very long distances.

Real world ballistics trumps calculated values.
__________________
I may be the slowest guy on the mountain . . . . but . . . . I'm on the mountain!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-31-2012, 07:53 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: east central fl. /n.c. pa.
Posts: 634
Re: Chrono VS Shooting

I use the chrono for ES and SD only and that is trumped by watching vertical dispersion at very long distances.

Real world ballistics trumps calculated values.[/QUOTE]

i would totaly agree.
in a way a chronagraph is almost a waste.
it woud work if you just winged it on your original estimate then worked up a chart from actual shooting.
and when you come right down to it you can eliminate the need for a
rangefinder by doing the same thing. provided you always hunt from the same
spots of coarse.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-31-2012, 08:35 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boise IDAHO
Posts: 838
Re: Chrono VS Shooting

I have posted my opinion on this in several conversations here lately but for the record I'll repeat it hear. I quit using my chronograph all together. Real drop tests from long range targets cycled threw the ballistics program to develop initial velocity output gave more reliable data than the chronograph. That data can still be used to generate drop charts thew the program and already includes proven and confirmed data. I figure since I have to confirm drops anyway and have to test a given load at long range anyway. I am not taking the long way around I am actually cutting right to the chase and getting stellar results this way. For me the chronograph has gone the way of the doedoe. It has bean replaced with the modern ballistics computer. One gadget intended to compliment the other has proven to simply do it better alone.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-31-2012, 11:46 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Vandergrift PA
Posts: 1,198
Re: Chrono VS Shooting

Thanks for the input.
Gonna just use my adjusted speed from my range time to finish my ballistics chart. I will take it out to 1400 and see if it holds.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-01-2013, 12:08 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: sw ks
Posts: 314
Re: Chrono VS Shooting

I use one to check theories and check ES but thats it. I also dont ever believe a chrono over a drop or spread. Only real issue which isnt really an issue is that you will never KNOW a real velocity. Of course since 2 chronos never agree and I cant get a cop and a radar gun to stand in front of me the point is moot. There can be a huge downrange data diff. due to the barrel. HUGE. Ive had 4 edge barrels. All shot within 5 fps of 2850. 1.25 moa elevation difference from worst to best at 1k. 1 needs more spindrift and windage than the other 3 and 1 needs less with 2 in the middle. May seem weird but it is what it is. And this is logbook data not my faulty memory.
__________________
Remember the advice you are giving that you got off of the internet and don't REALLY KNOW works might cause a miss or a wounded animal or a dead hunter. Please for the sports sake be 100% sure when you post something.
Per the NRA "long range STARTS at 600".
If your gun kicks get a brake....and some muffs. Unless your a masochist then its ok. Except you won't shoot as well.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-01-2013, 10:50 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 836
Re: Chrono VS Shooting

I use my chrono when working up a load, it tells me when I'm close to where I want to be. As far as a drop chart, I dial in the scope to the actual distance.
db
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 31.86%
65 Votes
NO - 51.96%
106 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 16.18%
33 Votes
Total Votes: 204
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC