Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

Case capacity gained with improved cartridges

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 01-10-2004, 12:22 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,757
Re: Case capacity gained with improved cartridges

Len

I have gained up to 6 grs of powder over the standard 300 RUM with the Tomahawk chambering.

Many of us just neck size the case so it's easy to see the gain on both cases AFTER they have been fired.
Simply fire the standard and IMP case, resize the neck, put a fired primer in upside down and fill with water. Weigh and deduct the difference between the two.

If you full length size "BOTH" standard and imp cases the "difference" will still be close to the above procedure as per the difference.

You can get the "maximum" case capacity by neck sizing only.

Most athorities on this subject feel that a 6% gain is worth going to the Imp. case.

I agree with that after shooting many Imp cartridges over the years.

Later
DC [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

[ 01-09-2004: Message edited by: Darryl Cassel ]
__________________
Darryl Cassel
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-10-2004, 12:34 AM
PUBLISHER
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,749
Re: Case capacity gained with improved cartridges

Darryl

Thanks. I am in the final stages of designing my reamer for the project. With your Tomahawk project, how much did you change shoulder location, neck length, body diameter at shoulder, etc? Would you design the reamer any differently today?
__________________


Long Range Hunting Rifles

Long Range Rifles, LLC - Ready To Ship

Components and assembly by LRH Sponsors
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-21-2004, 02:51 PM
PUBLISHER
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,749
Re: Case capacity gained with improved cartridges

Next chapter:

As you know, I am going to chamber a barrel for my Nesika Bay/HS Precision platform which is now in the 7 Dakota cartridge at 3,150 fps with the Cauterucio 176 grain bullet. I have tweaked my 7-338 Lapua reamer design some more. Now it looks like I will gain 7.5 grains of capacity over that of the 7 RUM. I am guessing at a max of 10 fps of velocity gain per 1 grain of case capacity for 75 fps. To reach this "max 10 to 1" conclusion I studied two things: the difference between my own 7 Dakota and my 7 RUM: and Hogdon's online loading data, with comparable pressures, for the 300 RUM and the 300 Short Action RUM.

Compared to my existing 7 RUM with its 30 inch barrel I should obtain about 3,400 to 3,450 fps with the Cauterucio 176 grain (.750 BC) vld bullet. That's plenty of gain (total of 120 fps) over my existing 7 RUM and 250 to 300 over my 7 Dakota, for me with my project. I will also benefit by going to the superior Lapua brass. Also, this harder brass may allow slightly (note: slightly) higher operating pressures and velocity since the harder brass probably reaches the point of tight extraction and, more certainly, loose primer pockets a little later.

Now here's a curious issue.

I have never worked on developing a wildcat cartridge of my own before so I have been going slowly and delberately in my analysis. I own a 7 RUM rifle which is based on the same case as the 300 RUM. So...I wondered how much capacity gain is achieved with the 300 Tomahawk project and even considered, for about an hour, a 7mm Tomahawk since it was mentioned on another post that Federal is now offering premium 300 RUM brass.

I obtained one unfired 300 RUM case and one fired 300 Tomahawk case. I also got a copy of the drawing for the 300 RUM reamer and one for the 300 Tomahawk reamer.

My conclusion is that I do not think the 300 Tomahawk improves case capacity by more than 3 grains of water. Resultant velocity gains would therefor be in the neighborhood of 25 to 30 fps. This hardly seems enough to justify all the work and expense, especially since you still are using the Remington brass. I never saw posted an opinion of how much velocity is gained and I guess I just wrongly assumed it was much more. I realize we all do these projects more for the fun of creation than for the actual measureable gains. I wonder, though, if some Tomahawk shooters would be disappointed to learn how little velocity is probably actually gained.

Or am I missing something here?

[ 02-21-2004: Message edited by: Len Backus ]
__________________


Long Range Hunting Rifles

Long Range Rifles, LLC - Ready To Ship

Components and assembly by LRH Sponsors
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-21-2004, 03:10 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,757
Re: Case capacity gained with improved cartridges

Len

As I mentioned before in another post.
Depending on the lot of brass, I have had an increase of 6 grains of capacity over the standard 300 RUM case when going to the Tomahawk.

The sharper shoulder of the Tomahawk also decreases overall case stretching when fired which is an advantage.

To me, it's worth going to the Tomahawk over the standard case and it doesn't take much to fireform it either.

If the new brass is really brass instead of nickle plated, it will be a bit of an improvement. The new lots of Remington brass seems to be better then the older stuff.

I shoot up to 104 grs, 106 grs, and 108 grs of powder in the 300 Tomahawk depending on the bullets fired.

I may go with a 7MM Tomahawk to see what it will do? I do want a longer barrel if I go that route though.

Later
DC

[ 02-21-2004: Message edited by: Darryl Cassel ]
__________________
Darryl Cassel
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-21-2004, 05:48 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 13
Re: Case capacity gained with improved cartridges

Len-

Where did you get a copy of the 300 Tomahawk reamer drawing (if you don't mind my asking)?

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-21-2004, 06:22 PM
PUBLISHER
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,749
Re: Case capacity gained with improved cartridges

Jim

From Dave Manson
__________________


Long Range Hunting Rifles

Long Range Rifles, LLC - Ready To Ship

Components and assembly by LRH Sponsors
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-21-2004, 07:26 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 13
Re: Case capacity gained with improved cartridges

Thanks Len.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Case capacity gained with improved cartridges
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Case capacity lever-hed Reloading 3 07-21-2009 12:31 PM
Case capacity of 338... trader388 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 5 12-01-2004 07:55 AM
Case Capacity 7ultra Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 6 10-11-2004 11:21 PM
Case length reduction upon fire forming Improved cartridges? Brent Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 9 03-18-2003 08:49 PM
Belted case versus beltless case cartridges Len Backus Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 0 05-02-2001 10:37 PM

Current Poll
Have You Ever Backpack Hunted?
YES - 62.15%
964 Votes
NO - 37.85%
587 Votes
Total Votes: 1,551
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC