Long Range Hunting Online Magazine calculating bc
 Home LRH Store Forums Long Range Rifles Articles Reviews Group Hunts Shooting Classes G7 Ballistics Calculator Rules & FAQ Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

calculating bc

#1
12-29-2010, 07:24 AM
 Silver Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 230
calculating bc

i have looked all over and cant find it. is there a search somewhere on this website? maybe im just blind. anyway, how do you calculate the true ballistic coeficient of a given bullet. i know theres given data for many bullets but ive heard that the bc changes for different conditions, velocity and rifles. also if you trim the meplate on a bullet such as the sierra matchking, the bc will change. can someone tell me a way to find the true bc of a given bullet. do you messure velocity at different ranges, or drop from one range to another? please help me out here. thanks in advance.
#2
12-29-2010, 07:31 AM
 Platinum Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Great Falls, MT Posts: 9,779
Re: calculating bc

The formula for calculating the ballistic coefficient for bullets only is as follows:[1][2]
where:
• BCBullets = ballistic coefficient
• SD = sectional density, SD = mass of bullet in pounds or kilograms divided by its caliber squared in inches or meters; units are lb/in2 or kg/m2.
• i = form factor, i = ; (CG ~ 0.5191)
• CB = Drag coefficient of the bullet
• CG = Drag coefficient of the G1 model bullet
• M = Mass of object, lb or kg
• d = diameter of the object, in or m
This BC formula gives the ratio of ballistic efficiency compared to the standard G1 model projectile. The standard projectile originates from the "C" standard reference projectile defined by the German steel, ammunition and armaments manufacturer Krupp in 1881.[3] The G1 model standard projectile has a BC of 1.[4] The French Gavre Commission decided to use this projectile as their first reference projectile, giving the G1 name.[5][6]
A bullet with a high BC will travel farther than one with a low BC since it will retain its velocity better as it flies downrange from the muzzle, will resist the wind better, and will “shoot flatter” (see external ballistics).[7]
When hunting with a rifle, a higher BC is desirable for several reasons. A higher BC results in a flatter trajectory which in turn reduces the effect of errors in estimating the distance to the target. This is particularly important when attempting a clean hit on the vitals of a game animal. If the target animal is closer than estimated, then the bullet will hit higher than expected. Conversely, if the animal is further than estimated the bullet will hit lower than expected. Such a difference in bullet drop can often make the difference between a clean kill and a wounded animal.
This difference in trajectories becomes more critical at longer ranges. For some cartridges, the difference in two bullet designs fired from the same rifle can result in a difference between the two of over 30 cm (1 foot) at 500 meters (550 yards). The difference in impact energy can also be great because kinetic energy depends on the square of the velocity. A bullet with a high BC arrives at the target faster and with more energy than one with a low BC.
Since the higher BC bullet gets to the target faster, it is also less affected by the crosswinds.

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballistic_coefficient)

I like math but I'd leave this to the pros - ballisticians. Personally, I'd go with the published BC (and use programs like what's on this site) and play around with the actual performance, drops, mV, and other factors you want to measure out of your tweaked loads at varying distances. I'm sure the pros will chime in soon.

Good luck!

Ed
__________________

I voted for my "FREEDOM", "GUNS", and "MONEY" - keep the change - UNK.

"I am always proud of my country!"

"Leadership Rule #2: Don't be an ***hole." - Maj Gen Burton Field.

Last edited by FEENIX; 12-29-2010 at 07:41 AM.
#3
12-29-2010, 07:42 AM
 Gold Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Las Vegas, NV Posts: 619
Re: calculating bc

I have not been to the site lately and am working from memory, but I recall that the JBM site has a section that allows you to input velocity at distances ( and possibly other variables) and back out a BC.

JeffVN
#4
12-29-2010, 09:27 AM
 Platinum Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Sedalia, MO Posts: 1,256
Re: calculating bc

FEENIX,

A slight history correction to the info you posted from Wikipedia; The Krupp (1881) and Gavre Commision firings (1873-1898) were the first "modern" attempts to determine the effects of atmospheric resistance on the new high velocity jacketed projectiles which were coming into being at that same time frame. Interesting period for ballistic research. Anyway, these and several other studies around the world were all using a roughly similar projectile for most of their firings, a blunt (2-caliber ogive) bullet approximately 3 calibers long, around one inch in diameter and weighing approximately one pound. They were generally refered to by the name of the commision doing the firings, i.e., Krupp, Gavre, or later the newer tables based on these earlier works, such as Russia's Mayevski, or our own Ingalls models. These newer works were also based around the same projectiles used in the earlier firings.

The problems associated with doing the workups on the entire range of different projectiles (including small arms, artillery and even bombs) wre greatly simplified witht he development of computers which could handle the tredious calculus problems involved, and that's when the work really took off. Our own Aberdeen Proving Ground developed a series of drag models for various shapes and properties during the late forties and fifties. Winchester's E.D. Lowrey published a compendium of these tables in 1965, which utilized the series of drag models we still use today; the G1, G2, G5, G6, G7, GL, etc.. The "G" used in the designation for this series was an homage to the work done by the Gavre Commision, but I'm not entirely sure who gave them the moniker. There's a good writeup of this in Hatcher's Notebook, by MG Julian Hatcher. Hatcher was the head of Army Ordnance for many years, and had something of a front row seat to many of these developments, making his perspectives particularly interesting. In that same book, he also has a complete set of Ingalls tables for calculating Ballistic Coefficients using the Ingalls' drag model. This table, incidentally, can be used with the later G1 data and BCs virtually interchangeably, with negligable errors in the final results.

Yeah, I know, I'm a nerd, but things like the comments in Wikipedia drive me nuts!
__________________
Kevin Thomas
Lapua USA
#5
12-29-2010, 09:55 AM
 Platinum Member Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: NC, oceanfront Posts: 4,197
Re: calculating bc

arrow, I don't believe there exists an 'easy way' to predict BC(no rules of thumb). Nor is there an easy way to measure it, or even express it!

The BC formula FEENIX brought in seems simple because it represents only a portion of work involved(the end calc). The "CB" in that formula(or CDtotal, or actual bullet total drag -at your velocities and conditions) does not just fall out of the sky into anyones hands...
Try a calc here for CD to get an idea-> JBM - Calculations

Here you'll find roadblocks like 'ogive radius' which is unknown and not easy to measure & determine with secant ogives. You'll find that meplat diameters matter pretty quick, and that they are difficult to measure with precision needed. Then there is more hidden work, as any BC figured has to be adjusted for air density and muzzle velocity..

And measuring BC is no simple task..
And correctly using/expressing the BC you hold is no simple task..
#6
12-29-2010, 03:59 PM
 Silver Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 230
Re: calculating bc

alright, so do you just start with the published data, typing that into the ballistic calculator and see how accurate it is? if i had a kestral 4500 and put those atmospheric conditions all into exbal and did a 100 yard zero then shot 300 and just plug in bc numbers until it matches. then try different distances? is this reliable?

if not, what im looking for are numbers people are plugging into exbal. i asume for the smk 175 .308 you would want g7 bc. is this correct? if so what numbers are you using? it will be coming out of a .308 winchester with a 20" barrel. the rifle is being built right now so i dont have velocitys yet. thanks
#7
12-29-2010, 05:31 PM
 Silver Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Prosperity, Pa Posts: 254
Re: calculating bc

Last edited by paphil; 12-29-2010 at 05:34 PM.

 Bookmarks

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads for: calculating bc Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post thorbird Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 10 07-26-2010 08:21 AM Naymola Long Range Hunting & Shooting 1 06-13-2010 01:50 PM Topshot Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 8 08-01-2009 04:16 PM RockyMtnMT Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 8 12-16-2008 12:46 AM aroshtr Long Range Hunting & Shooting 18 10-05-2007 08:11 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 AM.