Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

Bullet weight, velocity and BC......trade offs??

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-17-2006, 10:17 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Armagh, PA
Posts: 290
Bullet weight, velocity and BC......trade offs??

For setting up a gun to handle shooting inside of 500 yards...which do you choose...lghter bullet, less BC but higher MV or heavier bullet, more BC and less MV. The caliber is a .284 Winchester (1 in 9" twist barrel) and the game I'm after is elk. I know that the most accurate load is ultimately the winner but please read on.

I'll be testing the 140gr AB, 154gr SST, 160gr AB, and 162gr SST (and A-Max for target shooting). I've compared the book numbers for velocity and kinetic energy but I'm looking for actual experience. I know that heavy for caliber bullets are the ticket for LR shooting...lower initial velocity but better retained downrange energy. But at shorter range (0-500yd) is the heavier bullet and higher BC (160gr to 175gr bullet) significantly more beneficial or am I better off w/ more velocity and higher impact speed from a lighter 140 to 150gr class bullet?

Educate me!!
__________________
Dan B.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-17-2006, 10:58 AM
Official LRH Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fort Shaw, Montana
Posts: 6,796
Re: Bullet weight, velocity and BC......trade offs??

Dan B,

Wind drift is the first thing you need to worry about when hitting a target at longer ranges. It is true that lighter, faster bullets will often match the heavy slower bullets out to 500 yards in wind drift and generally will shoot even flatter.

The problem is that when the bullet gets on target, we need the bullet to do alot of work. In the case of the 284 Win, we need the bullet to do ALOT of work because there is not an over abundance of velocity or energy from this chambering at 500 yards.

That said with the proper bullet there is certainly plenty but for a dedicated elk rifle at 500 yards it is on the lower end of what I would recommend.

Of the bullets you list, I would pick first the 160 gr Accubond. I believe Hornady offers a 154 gr Interbond as well. That would be a much better choice then the SST for elk. Deer, thats another story but for elk, use the bonded core bullets in this weight range.

175 gr bullets are really to heavy for the 284 class of rifle in my opinion. The 160s offer plenty of penetration, better velocity and fit this case size better. The key is the bullet you use, the 160 Accubond would be very hard to beat if it shoots well in your rifle.

Just my opinion,

Kirby Allen(50)
__________________
Kirby Allen(50)

Allen Precision Shooting
Home of the Allen Magnum, Allen Xpress and Allen Tactical Wildcats and the Painkiller Muzzle brakes.

Farther, Faster and Flatter then ever before.

Web Page: www.apsrifles.com

allenmagnum@gmail.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-17-2006, 11:00 AM
Official LRH Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fort Shaw, Montana
Posts: 6,796
Re: Bullet weight, velocity and BC......trade offs??

Dan B,

Wind drift is the first thing you need to worry about when hitting a target at longer ranges. It is true that lighter, faster bullets will often match the heavy slower bullets out to 500 yards in wind drift and generally will shoot even flatter.

The problem is that when the bullet gets on target, we need the bullet to do alot of work. In the case of the 284 Win, we need the bullet to do ALOT of work because there is not an over abundance of velocity or energy from this chambering at 500 yards.

That said with the proper bullet there is certainly plenty but for a dedicated elk rifle at 500 yards it is on the lower end of what I would recommend.

Of the bullets you list, I would pick first the 160 gr Accubond. I believe Hornady offers a 154 gr Interbond as well. That would be a much better choice then the SST for elk. Deer, thats another story but for elk, use the bonded core bullets in this weight range.

175 gr bullets are really to heavy for the 284 class of rifle in my opinion. The 160s offer plenty of penetration, better velocity and fit this case size better. The key is the bullet you use, the 160 Accubond would be very hard to beat if it shoots well in your rifle.

The main thing in your post that will determine which bullet you should use is the word "ELK". These are tough critters. For deer hunting, the 140s and 150s are fine, for elk, use the 160s and you will be much happier with the results, especially if a big heavy shoulder happens to get hit!!

Just my opinion,

Kirby Allen(50)
__________________
Kirby Allen(50)

Allen Precision Shooting
Home of the Allen Magnum, Allen Xpress and Allen Tactical Wildcats and the Painkiller Muzzle brakes.

Farther, Faster and Flatter then ever before.

Web Page: www.apsrifles.com

allenmagnum@gmail.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-17-2006, 11:01 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas born and raised
Posts: 746
Re: Bullet weight, velocity and BC......trade offs??

Personally I would go with the 154 or the 160gr AB with the latter getting probably more attention. However the best shooting one would win out.

The advantage you will get with either will be better penetration than with the 140gr., (IMO), especially at the longer ranges. Yes the 140gr AB is designed to do some great stuff, but it is still a 140gr. In the 154, I might give the SPBT a try over the SST, just due to experience with them both. The SST is a great bullet however it seems to open up pretty quickly on the lighter game we have shot with it, where the standard SPBT penetrated a little deeper before really getting into the bigger wound channel. Granted I am also shooting them from a 7 mag as well as a 280 Rem. Also, our deer over here are nothing like an elk, but we have also used both on hogs with very similar results. I can promise you that the hogs are a GREAT test meduim for bullet preformance. They have it all, tough hide, big bones, and a tenacity for hangin in there even after being hit by a truck load of energy.

The 160gr AB would to me seem to be best suited. I know your not going to get blistering speeds from it, however, with the range you specified you will still be well within a realm of good penetration and accuracy. IT should hold together quite well and get well within the vitals on most any decent shot you might attempt. Even with a solid shoulder hit the heavier 160 will still have the remainder of the shank pushing it on through and into the vital areas.
__________________
Later,
Mike / Tx

My Photo's

"Heck why would I lie, most folks don't believe the truth when I tell them"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-17-2006, 12:21 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Armagh, PA
Posts: 290
Re: Bullet weight, velocity and BC......trade offs??

Kirby...I was asking so I can start gathering components for the XP that you signed for yesterday. I know the .284 Winny is on the light side but w/ a 160gr bullet and some calculations I have ran, it will still deliver over 1500 ft.lb. at 500 yards. Sufficient for "calendar" shots...broadside, relaxed and unsuspecting. I'm fully aware that it won't drive a bullet from stem to stern...and that's ok. The gun will be shot a lot (in matches and deer hunting) and I want it to last a while (hence the .284 vs the 7WSM)...then once I'm comfortable at shooting beyond 500yds then I'll jump to the 7WSM.

Sounds like a 154gr IB or 160gr AB will be the first to scoot down the tube of my APS XP-100.

Opinions is what I'm looking for. Thanks fellas......Dan
__________________
Dan B.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-17-2006, 09:02 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The rifle range, or archery range or behind the computer in Alaska
Posts: 3,515
Re: Bullet weight, velocity and BC......trade offs??

You wont be dissapointed with the 160 AB for what youre trying to accomplish.

Try the 162 AMAX for deer ect.. but stick to the AB's for elk.
__________________
Long range shooting is a process that ends with a result. Once you start to focus on the result (where the shot goes, how big the group is, what your buck will score, what your match score is, what place you are in...) then you loose the capacity to focus on the process.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-18-2006, 05:06 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,114
Re: Bullet weight, velocity and BC......trade offs??

It's about a toss up regarding what's more important at 500 yards for accuracy; wind bucking ability or accuracy. But I would choose accuracy because one can learn to read the wind and make corrections for it but you can't make corrections for accuracy after the ammo's loaded.

And unless you can shoot a 160-gr. spitzer boattail bullet out of your .284 Win. at 3000 fps, you'll not get 1500 ft. lbs of energy at 500 yards. One might get 2800 fps from a .284 Win. using a 160-gr. bullet but I doubt it unless the barrel's 26 or more inches long.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Bullet weight, velocity and BC......trade offs??
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
300 RUM Bullet weight? jackin brass Long Range Hunting & Shooting 10 08-28-2011 05:11 PM
What bullet weight would you run deerhunterjj Reloading 2 05-22-2011 01:49 AM
Bullet Weight For 22-150 Micheal326 Varmint Hunting 15 11-12-2008 10:19 PM
.243 bullet weight rtv900 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 5 10-06-2008 07:58 AM
Perfect Bullet Weight/Velocity Combination dbhostler Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 10 12-30-2003 08:49 PM

Current Poll
I currently have hunting preference points in the following states

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC