Re: Bullet Tractability
PERHAPS YOU CAN HAVE ONE OF YOUR SEVERAL THOUSAND MATHMATICIANS EXPLAIN YOUR OWN GYROSCOPIC STABILITY FORMULA TO YOU. WHEN YOU FIGURE THAT OUT, THEN MAYBE YOU CAN EXPLAIN TO THE REST OF US WHICH PART OF THE NUMERATOR GOES UP BY A FACTOR OF SIX WHEN THE BULLET GOES DOWN RANGE. WHEN YOU FIGURE OUT THAT THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE, MAYBE YOU CAN EXPLAIN TO US WHICH PART OF THE DENOMINATOR GETS REDUCED A FACTOR OF SIX, OUR DON'T YOU BELIEVE YOU OWN FORMULA?
Warren, you have been hiding behind the veil, you are no mathmatician, and you are no scientist. First you take on Bob Mc Coy, then the scientist at Sandia and Y-12, who next, God?
I have shot the weapons that S-1 has built. They shoot 1/3 moa at incredible ranges. The powdered tungsten bullet that S-1 helped intergrate for Spec-ops are more dense and less sensitive to the wind than anything you sell.
S-1 has walked the walk his whole life and I am suprised that someone in Spec-ops, as you claim to be on your web-site, is not familair with the state of the art bullet technology being used by our counter terrorism units, not to mention one particular agency that happens to guard our President. S-1 has had better ideas for over two decades, superior bullets, rifles, and optics are only a few. The difference between you, Warren, and S-1, is that S-1 intergrates his ideas and makes them work in the field, in ways you could not dream of.
One marine's two cents worth. Semper Fi
[ 12-26-2002: Message edited by: jarhead5272 ]