Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics


Reply

Boat tail or flat base

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-03-2007, 09:55 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 453
Boat tail or flat base

Question,
Dose a boat tail bullet burn a barrel out faster than a flat base bullet?


There was a few guys arguing about it at a gun show last weekend.Thought i would ask and see what ya'll had to say.
__________________
“If you keep doing what you’re doing, you’ll keep getting what you’re getting.”
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-03-2007, 10:47 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,232
There has been supposition of that idea, based on some research of laminar flow and the flame being orthogonal to the plane(s) of the base of the bullet.

I'm of the opinion that since the flame is 'different' between the flat base and boat tail bullets, that the throat erosion should be 'different'. Whether the difference is noticeable in the real world and whether its worse for flatbase or for BT bullets???

There are those on this and other forums that will state as fact that 'IT DOESN"T MATTER'. I think flat statements like that don't add to the collective knowledge (unless someone else is willing to jump in and argue the opposing viewpoint).

My personal opinion (came to me in a caffeine induced stupor, so nobody should argue too vehemently with it), is that for a instant, as the bullet is leaving the neck of the cartridge (BT's will leave a little sooner), that the heat of the powder will hit the throat an itsy bitsy (technical jargon) bit more than for a similarly weighted flat base bullet. Added to the paper on laminar flow that I read, I'd say BT's will lead to a tiny bit more throat erosion. But I wouldn't bet much on it (if there was a way to prove it), but I wouldn't bet anything against it ;-)

Just my personal, unsupportable, not worth argueing about it opinion.

AJ
__________________
If some is good and more is better, then too much is just right.


My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought, cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-03-2007, 11:35 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NC
Posts: 352
Quote:
I'm of the opinion that since the flame is 'different' between the flat base and boat tail bullets, that the throat erosion should be 'different'. Whether the difference is noticeable in the real world and whether its worse for flatbase or for BT bullets???
BigDaddy0381,
That above statement from AJ is so very true. And lets say this posts goes on for 2 years and has 1000s of replies. In the end it will still boil down to the above statement. In theory there is a difference, but in the end does it really make a difference in barrel "life". no

To expand on this a little, myself and a couple close friends who are big into long range BR shooting have done many experiments and one of our latest is shooting flatbase bullets in 600 and 1000yd BR competition. It a long story as to why, but something we wanted to try and test out.
Anyway, the test started out great. The first 6.5 140gr FB bullet design started shooting like a house-a-fire and won the first match out. We had a lot of success and no problems for awhile. Time goes by and these bullets started comping apart in flight and I ended up with several DQ for insufficient impacts on the targets to be scored.
When we ran into the bullets coming apart problem we talked with another long range competitor who is also a mechanical engineer by trade and has his own Oehler M43 permanetaly setup in his backyard shooting range. He informed us of some of his own experiments with his own 6mm FB bullets that came apart and showed comet tails on 25yd targets. He took a lot of 6mm FB bullets that would come apart in flight and cut a 3 degree boattail on the bback of them and they quit coming apart as often. He used the same barrel, Lot# of bullets, powder, everything on his own range and was able to reduce the number of blowups by simply cutting a 3 degree?? taper on the back of the existing bullet jacket.

That right there says there is a difference in heat transfer/generation between boattail and FB bullets under controlled test conditions. But as was pointed out above what does it really mean in the overall life of a barrel? I keep exact records of all of my competition rifles. I can't tell the difference in barrel life between the two bullets. The throat goes out first in a barrel and I beleive it has more to do with temperatures and pressure more than anything mecanical in the bullet.
Or to state it another way... what is the quickest way to burn out a barrel? Shoot hot loads at high velocity or increase your sustained rate of fire without a cool down period! And you can do both of the above with or without boattail bullets.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-03-2007, 01:05 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,844
For under 300 yards I use FB period for the long range stuff the BT is the best bet... I shoot 1k BR and have never found any difference in tube life --borescope verified...
__________________
The Truth Is Not Always Good For Business!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-03-2007, 03:26 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 453
I really can't see how are why it would make much defferance with ether.but it was fun listening to them go on and on and on about it.

THANKS for the info
__________________
“If you keep doing what you’re doing, you’ll keep getting what you’re getting.”
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-03-2007, 05:56 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: on the rifle range in Utah
Posts: 2,720
There is no practical difference between the two in barrel life. Other factors influence barrel life way beyond any measurable amount of boattails vs FB.
__________________
Find it
Range it
Click it
Pull it
Dump it

If it's not far, it's boring.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-11-2007, 07:50 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 453
Quote:
Originally Posted by goodgrouper View Post
There is no practical difference between the two in barrel life. Other factors influence barrel life way beyond any measurable amount of boattails vs FB.

This was my thoughts also.
__________________
“If you keep doing what you’re doing, you’ll keep getting what you’re getting.”
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Boat tail or flat base
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
boat tail and flat bottom bullets hubee_7j Reloading 4 09-24-2010 11:33 AM
.30 Cal 200 Gr Barnes TTSX Boat Tail sandbagger Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 2 04-02-2010 03:23 PM
210gr Berger Boat Tail LRHWAL Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 0 07-07-2008 01:16 AM
.270 Boat tail VS Non Boat tail otis348 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 10 11-02-2004 02:35 PM
Flat Base versus Boat tail Long Range Hunting & Shooting 3 05-22-2003 11:31 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC