Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics


Reply

BEWARE, Problems with Exbal and G7 BC's

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #29  
Old 12-12-2010, 09:22 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SW Montana
Posts: 4,550
Re: BEWARE, Problems with Exbal and G7 BC's

Bryan, as to LoadBase it does us Mach from what I can gather, from what I've been able to understand LB is not Pejsa only but a proprietary solution, which makes it hard to nail down which is OK.

I guess I have a better idea what to look for when inputting a BC as to which standard I should use, it does seem like a little amount but when shooting at or though transonic and beyond the little things show up, not that I can shoot at that level a lot but I shoot more and more in that range every time out!

I would love to see some guys like you Bryan, Gus, and Gerald in some kinda format like a symposium of type at a college!
Thanks again.
__________________
High Fence, Low Fence, Stuck in the Fence, if I can Tag it and Eat it, it's Hunting!

"Pain is weakness leaving your body"
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-12-2010, 09:32 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: polson MT.
Posts: 683
Re: BEWARE, Problems with Exbal and G7 BC's

I used nightforce so what program is it? Is it Exbal ?
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 12-12-2010, 10:12 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 53
Re: BEWARE, Problems with Exbal and G7 BC's

Yes, the Nightforce Program is basically the same as Exbal.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-12-2010, 10:40 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 53
Re: BEWARE, Problems with Exbal and G7 BC's

Bryan,
It seems to me that the most accurate method of modeling the trajectories of VLD type bullets would be to use velocity banded G7 BC's similiar to the way Sierra provides their G1 BC's. Do you have any comments on this? I am not sure how many of the available software packages even allow it or if it is even worth the effort. Perhaps any accuracy gains are insignificant?

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-12-2010, 11:21 PM
Official LRH Sponsor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 543
Re: BEWARE, Problems with Exbal and G7 BC's

Eric,

That's a good observation. Although the G7 BC varies much less than a G1, it still varies some, more or less depending on the shape of the bullet.

You could splice a multiple G7 together, but since it has so little variance to begin with, the difference between using the multiple G7 BC and an average G7 would be about 1" difference in trajectory at 1000 yards.

Using multiple G1's you can improve significantly compared to a single G1, but the same is not true for G7. Meaning, you can get an improvement, but it's so small as to be insignificant.

-Bryan
__________________
Bryan Litz
Ballistician

Author of: Applied Ballistics for Long Range Shooting
And: Accuracy and Precision for Long Range Shooting

Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-20-2010, 06:45 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 131
Re: BEWARE, Problems with Exbal and G7 BC's

Hi there,

Just to clarify some points exposed on this very nice thread.

1) LB3 does not use the Pejsa method.

2) It's a propietary algorithm, with many extensions to Dr. Pejsa's method.

3) During the development phase, Dr. Pejsa was very kind to discuss the new algorithm math and that's why he is credited as having provided the original concept.

4) The current algorithm employed in LB3 took over two years to develop, and the only part that has some resemblances is in how to model the Drag curve.

5) Both methods (LB3 and Pejsa) are all abouth MACH when modeling the drag curve. I think this is one of the less understood aspects of how the algorithm actually works.

Please check the following article that shows some differences in the predictions made by some methods.

Ballistics and Predictions

While the article does not discuss the inner aspects of the algorithms and the math behind them (clearly out of scope), the general idea is exposed when comparing their outcome.

The Point Mass (3DOF) method is used by the following free and commercially available ballistics programs: JBM (web), Berger, Litz, RSI, Ballistics FTE (iPhone), iSnipe (iPhone), BulletFlight (iPhone), Shooter (Android), FieldCraft (ex ABC by CheyTac), Balistika, Quick Target Unlimited, JBallistics, BigGameInfo (web) plus many others. The algorithm is well known and free computer code is available to download from the Internet.

The Pejsa method is used by the following free and commercially available ballistics programs: FFS (Field Firing Solutions), BallistiX, Dr. Pejsa’s own plus some free spreadsheets like BfX. One of the typical issues that are encountered with most of the usual solutions is that they are limited to supersonic velocity values, something very critical to take into consideration when evaluating these programs. The algorithm can be studied in the books published by the author.

Some graphs of actual Doppler radar data, compared to LoadBase 3.0 (Desktop and Mobile) predictions.


.338 Lapua Magnum (radar data provided by Lapua)







.50 BMG (radar data provided by a NATO facility, taken about a month ago)




__________________
regards, Gus

LoadBase© Desktop & Mobile editions - the ballistics/reloading software solution
http://www.patagoniaballistics.com
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-28-2012, 01:47 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2
Re: BEWARE, Problems with Exbal and G7 BC's

I have found a very strange thing while using nightforce exbal. this only shows up if you use the bullet database for G7 bc's.
If you run a table using standard atmospheric conditions, you get a drop that is close to actual but if you then rerun the table and change only the temperature, the long range drops go the wrong way.

what I mean is that if the temperature drops, you would expect more bullet drop at long range but with this program if you adjust the temperature down, it gives you less bullet drop at long range. Likewise if you set the temp higher, you would expect less drop but the program gives you more drop. I think this may be why your drop values are so far off.
I have run the same charts using the G1 bc.s and it seems to work correctly.

please check and give me your findings.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: BEWARE, Problems with Exbal and G7 BC's
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Montana Wolves Beware MT4XFore General Discussion 4 08-16-2011 08:58 PM
BUYERS BEWARE Ballistic64 Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 11 11-20-2009 09:59 AM
Exbal problems Topshot Long Range Hunting & Shooting 5 02-22-2009 09:51 PM
Grandma went and did it now, whitetails beware! Ridge Runner Deer Hunting 10 12-21-2008 07:45 AM
Groundhogs beware! Ridge Runner Equipment Discussions 15 01-07-2007 02:07 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC