Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

Barnes LRX TTSX, which one??

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-21-2011, 08:02 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 680
Barnes LRX TTSX, which one??

barnes X are my fav bullet, no debate ok, they are my favorite, always work for me, now they have LRX TTSX, increased BC for long range shooting, Ive got a new McWhorter 300wsm and cant decide on the 175 grain which I can push close to 3000fps or the heavier 200gr LRX TTSX which would be slower 2850 or so but little heavier bullet.
Your thoughts, slower heavier or little lighter, great BC and little faster??
__________________
Life is Short; Live, love, Hunt
270 Winchester.......Jack had it right
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-21-2011, 08:30 PM
Edd Edd is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 1,020
Re: Barnes LRX TTSX, which one??

It would be an easy decision for me. I'd choose the 175.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-21-2011, 09:00 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,755
Re: Barnes LRX TTSX, which one??

Wouldn't max distance be something to consider in a decission like this? One guy will answer thinking 300 yards. But since this is LRH I think of 1000 and might have a completely different answer.

With so many members these days you have to remember you might get some answers from guys that hunt in different terrain where 300 is a long poke. Or maybe 300 is your max distance to shoot??

And maybe even largest game you will be hunting?

JMO

Jeff
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-21-2011, 09:29 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 680
Re: Barnes LRX TTSX, which one??

Elk, Deer, 500 yards max for me with this rifle and scope.
__________________
Life is Short; Live, love, Hunt
270 Winchester.......Jack had it right
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-22-2011, 12:25 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,755
Re: Barnes LRX TTSX, which one??

For a max of 500 yards I would shoot which ever is most accurate in your rifle. At that distance I would take accuracy over velocity as either bullet would be heavy enough when well placed.

Jeff
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-22-2011, 11:38 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 680
Re: Barnes LRX TTSX, which one??

sounds good
__________________
Life is Short; Live, love, Hunt
270 Winchester.......Jack had it right
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-06-2012, 12:54 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 29
Re: Barnes LRX TTSX, which one??

My thoughts? MUCH lighter and phenominally faster.

As you already know, all Barnes X bullets are solid copper and don't deform, so you have near 100% weight retention and fantastic penetration for all bullet weights. Thus neither bullet weight nor sectional density play as much a role as with lead core bullets. For elk and deer to 500 yds I'd go with the lightest bullet for the flattest trajectory, even if you have a BDC scope or range finding equipment and turrets. Flatter is always better when all other criteria are met.

The Barnes 300 WSM load data shows the TTSX 130 with a MV of ~3450 FPS with a 24" tube. With a 250 yd zero this roughly equates to +/- 3 inches to 325 yds and 25 inches low at 500 yards. The TTSX 130 is devastating on both deer and elk with proper shot placement at these velocities and ranges.

It should be possible to load the TTSX 110 gr to 3700-3800 FPS in the 300 WSM for even flatter shooting. This yields a 110 gr .30 cal bullet shooting flatter than a 22-250 or 220 swift, with less than 24 inches of drop at 500 yds. This higher velocity tends to negate, or at least compensate for, the decreased mass vs the heavier (175/200) bullets travelling ~700-1000 FPS slower, from a penetration standpoint.

I'm planning to load up the 110s in my .308 Win @ 3500 FPS for Missouri whitetails. Given the penetration of these bullets at any weight I don't think I'd hesitate to use this round on elk at these ranges. Heck, people use 180 gr ballistic tips in .308, -06, and 300 WSM, and .270 140 gr BTs on Elk and even these heavier/higher SD BT bullets come apart inside the animal, decreasing penetration.

As always, the key to a good kill is shot placement. A head, neck, heart/lung, or shoulder/heart/lung shot with either the 110/130 in 300 WSM will be deadly. A faster flatter shooting round simply makes proper shot placement easier, whether you have fancy ranging equipment and scope or not. With the X bullets I don't think the heavier weight gains you much, if anything, over the lighter, much faster, flatter shooting bullets.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Barnes LRX TTSX, which one??
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Barnes TTSX zonker892 Elk Hunting 9 07-20-2011 11:49 PM
300 RUM and 168gr Barnes TTSX ShortMag3 Reloading 4 08-12-2010 10:07 AM
WTT Barnes 180 .308 TTSX for 168's Idaho_Elk_Huntr Reloading Equipment and Components 0 08-08-2010 11:40 AM
anyone using 300 RUM and barnes 168 ttsx Tony 0321 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 11 04-19-2010 09:50 PM
***New*** Barnes 6.5mm 120 gr TTSX Alan Griffith Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 5 01-02-2009 09:21 AM

Current Poll
Do you wear hearing protection while hunting?

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC