Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

Barnes 280 grain LRX low velocity expansion results.

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #50  
Old 09-15-2012, 04:17 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern Id.
Posts: 3,357
Re: Barnes 280 grain LRX low velocity expansion results.

Quote:
Originally Posted by barnesuser28 View Post
Rich, i may have to try that. Could you post a pic of your setup when you have a chance? I just got some conveyor belt from my grandpa that i am going to use to represent elk hide, and double it up to represent moose hide.

I am going to put the 300 grain OTM through a torture test. A full power load going through 2 layers of conveyor belt, 1.5" of wet newspapers, 2"-3" of hardwood, then the rest with wet newspapers at 50 yards. I am looking for at least 20" of penetration. If it goes 20" i am going to switch from the Barnes to Berger. I know thats a lot to ask from thin jacketed bullet but thats the kind of performance i want.
It MIGHT do that? I don't think it will if you shoot it thru a few inches of water first, but then I'm not familiar with the .338 OTM either....Rich
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 09-15-2012, 04:25 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: ND
Posts: 2,718
Re: Barnes 280 grain LRX low velocity expansion results.

No water, just wet newspapers. If the smk performs just as well as the OTM then i will go smk.
__________________

I'm 15
"Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth."
~George Washington

"The only advantage a light rifle has is weight, all other advantages go to the heavy rifle."
~ JE Custom

Biggest fail of 2014 so far... http://www.longrangehunting.com/foru...ea-ftf-128972/
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 09-15-2012, 06:57 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern Id.
Posts: 3,357
Re: Barnes 280 grain LRX low velocity expansion results.

Quote:
Originally Posted by barnesuser28 View Post
No water, just wet newspapers. If the smk performs just as well as the OTM then i will go smk.
I'm pretty sure the SMK will out penetrate the OTM but I'm not sure that is a good thing! I could never get the SMK's to open at any reasonably slow velocity. Here is a pic of my bullet box. It is made out of OSB approx 18" wide and 4 feet long. Just wide enough so folded cardboard boxes will fit inside. Sometimes I add phone books, etc. I then soak with water and wait until the boxes are completely saturated. It is good to place a blank paper or something at intervals to check the path of the bullet. They are not always that easy to find when they are shot up a bit. The box in the front is totaled so I need to build a new one but you can kind of get the idea.....richBarnes 280 grain LRX low velocity expansion results.-dscf0184.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 09-15-2012, 07:15 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern Id.
Posts: 3,357
Re: Barnes 280 grain LRX low velocity expansion results.

Here is an example of one of my 211 grain SXR II's fired at full throttle
out of an 'o6 through 22" of H20 and about 12" of wet carboard. This bullet was designed to hold up under high velocity but expand down to 1300'....Rich
Attached Thumbnails - Click to View Larger
Barnes 280 grain LRX low velocity expansion results.-dscf0186.jpg   Barnes 280 grain LRX low velocity expansion results.-dscf0187.jpg  

Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 09-15-2012, 07:26 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,820
Re: Barnes 280 grain LRX low velocity expansion results.

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkaholic View Post
It MIGHT do that? I don't think it will if you shoot it thru a few inches of water first, but then I'm not familiar with the .338 OTM either....Rich

This test is in case the elk is scuba diving in a deep wallow.

Jeff
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 09-15-2012, 08:20 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern Id.
Posts: 3,357
Re: Barnes 280 grain LRX low velocity expansion results.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Broz View Post
This test is in case the elk is scuba diving in a deep wallow.

Jeff
That's correct Actually, flesh is 80 some % water so I think it's a little better media than you think. Bill Stigers (Bitterroot Bullets) told me that water was the best test and after trying pretty much everything else, I have to agree with him. It has to be better than dirt and rocks that you tested mine in a few years back when you said they looked just like the Bergers!!!!

Last edited by elkaholic; 09-15-2012 at 09:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 09-15-2012, 10:57 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,820
Re: Barnes 280 grain LRX low velocity expansion results.

Quote:
Originally Posted by elkaholic View Post
It has to be better than dirt and rocks that you tested mine in a few years back when you said they looked just like the Bergers!!!!
Hmm, don't remember ever testing your bullets for expanion. I do remember shooting a few to test drops,(BC) and accuracy and they did do well. They shot in the same place as the Berger 210 HVLD load I had if I remember correctly, or at least pretty close at 1000 yards. My new custom 300 was not done at the time and I used a stock sendero. Maybe I did dig them out of the ground but you know that is not how I test for expansion or performance. I have posted pics of a media box I tested the 300 OTM's in and a ton of entrance and exits hole pics on game from the 210 VLD, 230 and 300 OTM's. I like using antelope as they are in the open so you can keep an eye on them, plus they are soft and easy to kill. I liked your bullets and still have about 1/2 of the 10 or so I was asked to test. The only thing I could say negative about them is the problem you were having with the rebated boat tail at the time. They are larger at the top of the boat tail than on the rest of the bearing surface so they expand the neck durring seating. This made for loose neck tension with my sizing methods, and care was needed to keep a consitsant seating depth while testing.

I think we can see with tumbleweeds cut bullets that the large pockets in the tip of the 215 could very well be why your testing lost tips. That open pocket is not going to hold up if you blast it full of water. 80% is a lot of water but 20% solids is not to be ignored either. Like I said before in my thread on the 210 / 215, I will see for myself what the 215 does on game starting with antelope if they show me good accuracy. Then on to larger game this season. If they look to be less leathal than the 210 HVLD that I have had truck loads of 1 shot long range kills with, I have no problem at all continuing to use the 210 as my 30 cal long range bullet.

Jeff
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Barnes 280 grain LRX low velocity expansion results.
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
162 AMAX (.284) Min Expansion Velocity hmbleservant Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 26 04-13-2014 05:26 PM
Barnes Bullet eXpansion barnesuser28 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 45 04-22-2012 02:59 PM
Minimum velocity for expansion? kodiakhunter1 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 2 05-20-2010 09:08 PM
minimum velocity for reliable expansion? rufous Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 1 01-13-2007 12:45 AM
Expansion failures & Barnes X POP Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 5 02-15-2005 11:05 AM

Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 32.50%
78 Votes
NO - 50.42%
121 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 17.08%
41 Votes
Total Votes: 240
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC