Join 70,000 Long Range Hunting members.Please register for FREE to get full access.

 Long Range Hunting Online Magazine Ballistics Question?
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Home LRH Store Forums Long Range Rifles Articles Reviews Video G7 Ballistics Calculator Rules & FAQ Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

# Ballistics Question?

#1
04-23-2008, 09:41 AM
 Silver Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Central, KY Posts: 321
Ballistics Question?

This is an odd question but I have always wondered when a bullet is fired from a fast moving vehicle such as a fighter jet, what happens?

If the jet is traveling nearly as fast a bullet, then fires a bullet the bullets would then be traveling twicw as fast as one would from a stationary gun.

Does the construction of the bullet need to different to handle the friction? How does it differ ballictically?
__________________
Thanks,
Scott
#2
04-23-2008, 10:31 AM
 Silver Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Elko, NV Posts: 462
I don't know about the bullet construction, but the speeds will add, so if the plane is going the same speed as the bullet, and the bullet is shot in the same direction as the plane then the overall bullet speed will be twice as fast.
#3
04-23-2008, 11:40 AM
 Platinum Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Wyoming Posts: 2,615
I'm a rocket scientist and not a jet fighter scientist so I don't know at what speeds they fire bullets out of jets. A bullet shot at 3000 fps is about 2045 mph which is faster than our fighter jets. Back in ww2 the prop fighters relied on machine gun fire instead of missiles but they didn't go very fast. Even at 500 mph which adds about 733 fps on the bullet for a total of 3733 fps isn't a problem. Even in Vietnam with the F-4 phantoms they were not as fast as todays jets but certainly they used a lot of machine gun fire. I don't know at what speeds in a dogfight they were accurate, but at 1000 mph the combined bullet velocity is up to 4466 fps. I think todays jets at 1500 mph primarily use missiles.

With missiles at high speed, heat off the nose cone represents a big problem because we must design it around all the junk we have to get inside the nosecone. We can't just build a sleek streamlined nosecone in other words. With a bullet you can, which should keep the heat down to workable levels. But even at that and considering the full metal jackets they shoot I still bet that metal gets a bit soft in the front. Looking at the bullets they use I wonder if that different colored tip where most of the heat would be is a metal much more resistant to heat. What happens to that plastic, nylon tip popular on a lot of bullets when fired at 4000 fps or about 2727 mph? That is pretty close to equal of a 50 caliber shot out of a F-4 phantom.

Good question.
__________________
Predictions are difficult, especially when they involve the future
#4
04-23-2008, 05:03 PM
 Platinum Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: on the rifle range in Utah Posts: 2,723
Oh how I love these types of questions. Sure beats the heck out of "uumm what's the best load for my 30-06". I know I'm not normal but who is?

Ok, here she goes:

Quote:
 Originally Posted by scsims This is an odd question but I have always wondered when a bullet is fired from a fast moving vehicle such as a fighter jet, what happens??
This is all relative to the Point of View as to what you "see" but in absolute reality, the same thing happens everytime. Physics teaches that the velocity of the fired round is added to the velocity of the jet. However, since the bullet rapidly decelerates due to the increase in air resistance, several things appear to happen. If you are the pilot in an SR71 Blackbird (which holds the currently disclosed airspeed record for a manned jet) zipping along at 3.2 mach or 2200 mph or 3226.74 feet per second and you fire a bullet (hypothetically of course as the Blackbird was never fitted with guns) at just over that speed, you will see the bullet go out ahead of you for a time and speeds similiar to a slow bb gun then as your plane catches up, the bullet will come right back at you given a no wind situation of course. A bystander on the ground would not see either the bullet or the jet because of their extreme speeds and how much ground they cover in a short time but if he could, he would see the bullet leave the jet at double the speed, then see it slow, then see the jet pass it, and then see the bullet trailing behind the jet until it's velocity couldn't overcome the effects of gravity and if fell from the sky.

Now, how about a gun fired from behind the jet backwards? If the bullet is slightly faster than the velocity of the jet, then it will go away from the jet at the difference. If the bullet was slower than the jet, it would appear to trail the jet from the pilot's point of view as it decreased in velocity from air resistance and got farther and farther from the jet. The opposite vectors either add or subtract and it would depend on where you were at in the scenario as to what you would actually see as an effect.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by scsims if the jet is traveling nearly as fast a bullet, then fires a bullet the bullets would then be traveling twicw as fast as one would from a stationary gun.??
The speed of the jet would be added to the MUZZLE velocity but because of increased velocity, the air resistance would be greater and quickly begin to decelerate the bullet much quicker than the bullet fired from the stationary. Remember Newton's laws? For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. A bullet fired at double the normal speed will encounter double the air resistance. Yep, you read that right folks. A 221 fireball shot from a handgun at 2000 fps encounters 1/3 less resistance than a 223 fired at 3000 fps if bullet shapes are same. Or half the resistance of a 220 swift at 4000 fps.
Quote:
 Originally Posted by scsims Does the construction of the bullet need to different to handle the friction? How does it differ ballictically
The melting point of lead is 621.5 degrees F. The melting point of copper is 1984 degrees F. An alloyed copper will be higher. The melting point of depleted uranium (which is what a lot of anti-aircraft air to air bullets are made with) is 2069 degrees F. The melting point of plastics and polymers varies greatly depending on their crystalline structures and theromplastic or thermalite properties but it is around 600 degrees F. for some.
A 223 bullet fired at around 3000 fps is heated by gas, friction on bore, and then friction against air to a maximum of 500 to 550 degrees F. with most of the heating occuring from the gas and friction in the bore. Air resistance is a very distant third.

So you can see that none of those commonly used materials will melt from being fired from a gun at normal speeds. However, a lead tipped bullet fired from a supersonic jet WOULD melt itself right off but you won't find any lead tipped ammunition being fed through a gun on a supersonic jet. It is depleted uranium or solid copper which would need nearly four times the temp of melting lead to melt.

Incidentally, the leading edges of the SR71 Blackbird jet under maximum velocity of mach 3.2 soared well over 600 degrees F.. This was at 75,000 feet elevation which is where the top speeds were reached. Lower elevations heated up the plane to even higher temps of around 900 degrees F. because of the higher density of air at lower elevations. Mach 3.2 was never achieved at much lower elevations.

Because of the superheating that occurs in hypersonic flight, the Blackbird was designed to be very "loose fitting" during construction. As it sits on the runway, it leaks oil, fuel, and the hinged parts wobble. But when she's ripping through the atmosphere at normal operating speeds, the parts of the plane swell from the thermal expansion of supersonic flight and everything "self seals". And they built this thing in the SIXTIES!!!!
__________________
Find it
Range it
Click it
Pull it
Dump it

If it's not far, it's boring.

Last edited by goodgrouper; 04-23-2008 at 05:21 PM..
#5
04-23-2008, 05:25 PM
 Silver Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 121
A balistic engineer couldn't give a better explanation

However, it doesn't mean that one has to agree with it.

Peter
#6
04-23-2008, 05:53 PM
 Bronze Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: WA Posts: 91
Any speed over the speed of sound (Mach 1), which is approximately 1,087 ft/s or 761 mph in air at sea level, is said to be supersonic.

I just thought that was interesting. I never knew what fps the speed of sound was. I had looked that up a few months back when I was curious what mach my bullets were traveling at.
__________________
Steve

.................................................. .....................
I'd rather be hunting with Uncle Ted!
Backstrap fever!
#7
04-23-2008, 06:51 PM
 Platinum Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: USA Posts: 2,599
For the speed of sound to be 1087 fps the temerature would have to be 32 F. at 70 degrees the speed is 1129 fps and 1142 fps at 80 F

According to this web site with a speed calculator;

Speed of Sound
__________________
range it,check the wind, dial in correction, aim and only one shot

 Bookmarks

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads for: Ballistics Question? Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Silversbullet Long Range Hunting & Shooting 1 10-19-2011 12:32 PM Nikolakangrga Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 5 08-06-2011 08:43 PM jeffro Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 6 11-07-2009 07:34 PM jmeier1981 Long Range Hunting & Shooting 3 02-03-2009 01:34 AM danacobb Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 2 12-13-2003 09:25 PM

 Current Poll Do you wear hearing protection while hunting? Usually do Usually do not No but I probably will in future
 Current Poll - 2 Do you have a high speed Internet connection? Yes, DSL, satellite, wireless or something else. - 89.17% No, only dialup right now. - 10.83% Total Votes: 3,037You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 AM.

 Contact Us - Long Range Hunting Online Magazine - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top