Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

In all honesty, how much better is a 6mm over a 243. win

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-22-2010, 04:20 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 705
In all honesty, how much better is a 6mm over a 243. win

If you have read my last 2 posts about either buying or making a rifle for long range hunting and shooting. I was strongly leaning towards the 243. win or 243. ackley improved. My neighbor and his best friend are huge into reloading, and told me they would be more then happy to reload for me as long as i supplied.

My neighbor is a huge fan of the 243. win, and his buddy is a huge fan of the 243. ackley improved. I love the 243. win myself and im very interested in the Ackley Improved cartridges. Where i hunt around my house shots can be well past 1000 yards, but the majority of long shots around between 400-700 yards. When i go down south my buddy's place, he lives in Montana so shots can be extremely long. I would like to be capable of shooting and hunting out to 500-600 yards for varmints. Now i know loaded right, with the right equipment, the 243. win and AI are more then capable of doing it. Everyone keeps telling me to leave the 243. win and AI behind and go for a 6mm or 6.5 cartridge of some sort. Does the 6.5 really have that much advantage over the 243. Im not entering long range competitions, im not looking to break records, im interested in long range hunting and shooting and want to set my own records.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-22-2010, 04:37 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 349
Re: In all honesty, how much better is a 6mm over a 243. win

.243 is 6mm. Now my 6mm Remington, is about 200fps faster than the 243 win in factory loadings. I dont reload yet, so the tricks that the slightly larger case can deliver I cant comment on.

As far as I know, the choice in bullets is the same, just depends on how fast you want to push them.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-22-2010, 04:42 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NW Mt.
Posts: 600
Re: In all honesty, how much better is a 6mm over a 243. win

The 6mm runs about 100 fps faster than the 243. I would think the AI in 243 is as
fast or faster. A 6.5 is a lot more bullet, I don't put them in the same class. In either
case it is barrel twist that is going to let you shoot the long heavy bullets needed for
long range. After you decide on calibre, do your research on twist for it. Both 243/6mm
and 6.5 bullets are doing well in 1000 yard events. 243 Has about 115 grain as max
weight and 6.5 up to 160. Takes a 1:7 or 1:8 to shoot the heavies and mag length
can become a problem for either. m2c
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-22-2010, 06:10 PM
B23 B23 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Spokane, Wa.
Posts: 932
Re: In all honesty, how much better is a 6mm over a 243. win

If you do decide on a 243 AI I have a brand new Redding Type S bushing 3pc die set for sale.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-22-2010, 07:38 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Blackfoot, Idaho
Posts: 8,093
Re: In all honesty, how much better is a 6mm over a 243. win

If your question is about the difference between a 6mm Rem and a 243 Win 'my' answers is: "negligible"

If your question is about a 6.5 something and a 243 Win 'my' answer is: There is a world of difference. If favor of the 6.5!

I may be the odd man out here, but I've never been able to make any 243 Win I've ever had shoot even reasonably well.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-22-2010, 07:38 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern Id.
Posts: 3,357
Re: In all honesty, how much better is a 6mm over a 243. win

Quote:
Originally Posted by matt_3479 View Post
If you have read my last 2 posts about either buying or making a rifle for long range hunting and shooting. I was strongly leaning towards the 243. win or 243. ackley improved. My neighbor and his best friend are huge into reloading, and told me they would be more then happy to reload for me as long as i supplied.

My neighbor is a huge fan of the 243. win, and his buddy is a huge fan of the 243. ackley improved. I love the 243. win myself and im very interested in the Ackley Improved cartridges. Where i hunt around my house shots can be well past 1000 yards, but the majority of long shots around between 400-700 yards. When i go down south my buddy's place, he lives in Montana so shots can be extremely long. I would like to be capable of shooting and hunting out to 500-600 yards for varmints. Now i know loaded right, with the right equipment, the 243. win and AI are more then capable of doing it. Everyone keeps telling me to leave the 243. win and AI behind and go for a 6mm or 6.5 cartridge of some sort. Does the 6.5 really have that much advantage over the 243. Im not entering long range competitions, im not looking to break records, im interested in long range hunting and shooting and want to set my own records.
My personal preference would be a good 6.5 for what you want to do for a couple of reasons. There are a good selection of HIGH b.c. bullets which will buck the wind better and hit harder especially if you plan on hunting big game at all. This is especially true if you go to a little larger case like the .284 etc........Rich
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-22-2010, 10:44 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Base of the Bluemountains aka Gods Country
Posts: 466
Re: In all honesty, how much better is a 6mm over a 243. win

"The 6.5X284 is a good round I shot it for years. But when it come to varmit hunting the 6mm's at high velocity beats it to pieces. B.C. is important but there is a fine line between the 6mm 107 sierra bc of .53 and the 142smk at .59 so there really isnt that big of a spread betwen them. The 107 at 3400fps is way way flater shooting then the 142smk at 2950 to 3000 fps. The flatter shooting rounds make up for a lot in errors in ranging calculations and wind drift. So to answer your question with my real world expirence with both calibers going ground hog hunting. I would take the 6mm every time.

Another real world expirence is bullet expansion on varmits. The 107 smk blows ground hogs to pieces. The 142 smk just punches holes in them. To each their own just my .02 cents worth" This was said in the thread i started a week ago there is a lot of good info check it out.help with a new caliber

Last edited by Booney; 04-22-2010 at 10:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 32.50%
78 Votes
NO - 50.42%
121 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 17.08%
41 Votes
Total Votes: 240
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC