Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

Actual vs. published bc

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-17-2013, 02:04 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Actual vs. published bc

What is the best/easiest way to determine actual bc of a given bullet without being an engineer or mathematician?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-17-2013, 03:20 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Mid Missouri
Posts: 20
Re: Actual vs. published bc

Most of the time I just use what the mfr. publishes. Usually they're close enough.
If you want to get more in depth, this site can help.
all about bullets
__________________
"The nine most terrifying words in the English language are,
'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'"
- Ronald Reagan
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-18-2013, 06:58 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC, oceanfront
Posts: 3,268
Re: Actual vs. published bc

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rbreb13 View Post
If you want to get more in depth, this site can help.
That's an article about greenhill TWIST calcs, and not BC..
There is no 'easy' way to determine -actual- BC. Your best bet is to use BC data from Bryan Litz's book: AB for Long Range Shooting
And learn to use the latest in ballistic software in conjunction.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-18-2013, 08:42 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,081
Re: Actual vs. published bc

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikecr View Post
That's an article about greenhill TWIST calcs, and not BC..
There is no 'easy' way to determine -actual- BC. Your best bet is to use BC data from Bryan Litz's book: AB for Long Range Shooting
And learn to use the latest in ballistic software in conjunction.
What software do you run?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-19-2013, 06:40 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 550
Re: Actual vs. published bc

most of the recently published BCs are fairly accurate; prior to the last few years the Bcs on lots of bullets were heavily inflated. Sierra being the only real exception - since they have always released banded BC tired to velocity. Many ballistic software manfacturers had now fully integrated the newer bc numbers.

I know the Bcs in my android app (shooter) are pretty good, out to about 1,500 yards. After that, they numbers are still too high and you need to do your own banded velocity inputs. My brother uses Field Firing Solutions, and its pretty good out to a mile (1,760) and it lets you modify the inputs to reflect actual results.

The site JBM Ballastics has a good calulator that includes pretty good bc.

Jeffvn
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-19-2013, 08:51 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South of Canada and North of Wyoming
Posts: 5,954
Re: Actual vs. published bc

I think you will find Bryan Litz' BC's to be very accurate. I use his. But if he hasn't calculated one for a particular bullet, I use the manufacturer's BC as a starting place. Then I shoot the bullets and confirm drops at different ranges. Then I fudge the velocity and BC to get the closest curve for my load and rifle. To do this right, your info must accurate. Scope height, accurate zero, accurate groups and interpretation, accurate environmental conditions and the farther you test your drops, the better.
__________________
- Mark

You will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you make good use of it.
~ John Quincy Adams
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 31.82%
70 Votes
NO - 50.91%
112 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 17.27%
38 Votes
Total Votes: 220
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC