close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics

Reply

7mm AM vs .300 WM

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 01-07-2009, 02:37 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 32
7mm AM vs .300 WM

Hello eveyone, Im new to the forum here.

I have finally decided to build a custom long range hunting rifle and cant really decide on the best caliber. This rifle will be used for elk, muleys, kudu, and at least once on an eland (if the good Lord is willing). I have some what narrowed my list down to the .300 Win Mag and the 7mm Allen Mag. I am 5'10" and 160 lbs so I am concerned with recoil. The rifle should not exceed 9 lbs and 26" barrel so as to make it more friendly on my mountain hunts. My Kimber .325 WSM has a sharp recoil but I can manage it well (I think I can shoot better than this particular rifle!) The 7mm AM should be sufficient on the large eland with 175 grainers out to 500+ I would think, certainly adequate for the other large critters. I like the .300 for 200 and 220 grainer capability but my all purpose load wiould be the 180 grainer. SO..., is there any other calibers that you would recommend? Thoughts, comments, suggestion?

HELP! Thanks in advance.
__________________
------------------------------------------------
Double taps are for Wussies...
Reply With Quote
  •   #2  
    Unread 01-07-2009, 02:42 PM
    SPONSOR
     
    Join Date: Aug 2006
    Location: Columbia, MO
    Posts: 1,457
    Re: 7mm AM vs .300 WM

    The Allen Mag whoops the 300 Win in every category. Shooting 180 Bergers or 200 Wildcats it will trounce the 300 in drop, wind, ft lbs, and most likely accuracy.

    You'd probably want a brake on a light gun though.
    Reply With Quote

      #3  
    Unread 01-07-2009, 02:45 PM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2008
    Location: Elko, NV
    Posts: 461
    Re: 7mm AM vs .300 WM

    My vote is for the 7mm AM. It's on top of the pile for longrange hunting.
    Reply With Quote
      #4  
    Unread 01-07-2009, 03:10 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Jul 2004
    Location: OHIO
    Posts: 2,417
    Re: 7mm AM vs .300 WM

    There are plenty of reasons to get either. For decades, many who prefer to be a "one gun" hunter choose the venerable 300 WM, and for good reason. It simply works and works well. The hole is bigger, the bullet wt selection is heavier, it is a very accurate caliber. It is an excellent choice.

    I do not have personal knowledge of the 7AM other than what I've read here. It appears to be an excellent choice for a do-all rifle. To be blunt, if a 140 Berger VLD from a 6.5x284 can dump a bull elk at 900+ yards, there's nothing either of your two choices can't do better.

    If you are to travel across the world to hunt, you can find 300 WM ammo just about anywhere. Not so with the AM. So, if you go on a hunt of a lifetime and your 7mm AM ammo is a no show, you are out of luck. I guess that would be the only downside of any wildcat or semi-uncommon caliber.

    Kirby built a rifle for me in 270AM and did an excellent job. The rifle shoots very well.

    Good luck with your decision.
    __________________
    Derek M.
    Reply With Quote
      #5  
    Unread 01-07-2009, 04:16 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Jun 2001
    Location: Potomac River
    Posts: 5,071
    Re: 7mm AM vs .300 WM

    I own a 7AM and for the purposes you describe, it hardly sounds like the cartridge of choice. It is best with a lot of barrel length to burn all of the powder. A 7mm AM is the ultimate ultra-long range 7mm. Kirby has a "small" green stocked 7AM he hunts with a lot and I do not know the weight of it. Maybe it meets your criteria. For a under 600 yard rifle for elk sized animals it would seem to me that the slightly smaller 7mm's would be easier to build a rifle to meet your specification and do the job just as well. I killed a near B&C wild bison with a 7 Wby. I don't think an eland or kudu is bigger than that.

    So, if it was me and I was building a rifle for shooting animals under 1000 yards a 7STW is what I would compare to a 300 WM. I am a fan of the 7mm but I personally don't see much difference in killing ability of the two cartridges at the ranges you talk about.

    Kirby does build a lot of rifles that are not Allen Mags, so it is not like he can't put in whatever chamber you would like.
    __________________
    The Smokin Fur Rifle Club
    Reply With Quote
      #6  
    Unread 01-07-2009, 06:39 PM
    Gold Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2007
    Location: Central Illinois
    Posts: 914
    Re: 7mm AM vs .300 WM

    Kirby built a 300WM for me on a Weatherby Vanguard action that is a great shooter! It would be hard to beat for your purposes.
    Reply With Quote
      #7  
    Unread 01-07-2009, 08:06 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2004
    Location: Pennsyltucky
    Posts: 2,630
    Re: 7mm AM vs .300 WM

    i basically agree with everything said. my concept of a 7AM is it's a serious long range cartridge. my gut feeling is you don't have much experience with long range and i wouldn't recommend a 7AM. the 300WM is also a great cartridge, can do everything you want.

    my suggestion would be to use the 325WSM. it will also do everything you want. bullet selection is not as good but you can probably find something that will work well. get the gun accurized and shoot it a year or so. then decide what you want to build.
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes



    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 AM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC