Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

7mm AM vs .300 WM

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-07-2009, 02:37 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 21
7mm AM vs .300 WM

Hello eveyone, Im new to the forum here.

I have finally decided to build a custom long range hunting rifle and cant really decide on the best caliber. This rifle will be used for elk, muleys, kudu, and at least once on an eland (if the good Lord is willing). I have some what narrowed my list down to the .300 Win Mag and the 7mm Allen Mag. I am 5'10" and 160 lbs so I am concerned with recoil. The rifle should not exceed 9 lbs and 26" barrel so as to make it more friendly on my mountain hunts. My Kimber .325 WSM has a sharp recoil but I can manage it well (I think I can shoot better than this particular rifle!) The 7mm AM should be sufficient on the large eland with 175 grainers out to 500+ I would think, certainly adequate for the other large critters. I like the .300 for 200 and 220 grainer capability but my all purpose load wiould be the 180 grainer. SO..., is there any other calibers that you would recommend? Thoughts, comments, suggestion?

HELP! Thanks in advance.
__________________
JED CRABB
(580) 713-9146
targetman76@yahoo.com
www.limcroma.com
www.esasafaris.com
------------------------------------------------
Double taps are for Wussies...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-07-2009, 02:42 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,302
Re: 7mm AM vs .300 WM

The Allen Mag whoops the 300 Win in every category. Shooting 180 Bergers or 200 Wildcats it will trounce the 300 in drop, wind, ft lbs, and most likely accuracy.

You'd probably want a brake on a light gun though.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-07-2009, 02:45 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Elko, NV
Posts: 461
Re: 7mm AM vs .300 WM

My vote is for the 7mm AM. It's on top of the pile for longrange hunting.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-07-2009, 03:10 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: OHIO
Posts: 2,419
Re: 7mm AM vs .300 WM

There are plenty of reasons to get either. For decades, many who prefer to be a "one gun" hunter choose the venerable 300 WM, and for good reason. It simply works and works well. The hole is bigger, the bullet wt selection is heavier, it is a very accurate caliber. It is an excellent choice.

I do not have personal knowledge of the 7AM other than what I've read here. It appears to be an excellent choice for a do-all rifle. To be blunt, if a 140 Berger VLD from a 6.5x284 can dump a bull elk at 900+ yards, there's nothing either of your two choices can't do better.

If you are to travel across the world to hunt, you can find 300 WM ammo just about anywhere. Not so with the AM. So, if you go on a hunt of a lifetime and your 7mm AM ammo is a no show, you are out of luck. I guess that would be the only downside of any wildcat or semi-uncommon caliber.

Kirby built a rifle for me in 270AM and did an excellent job. The rifle shoots very well.

Good luck with your decision.
__________________
Derek M.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-07-2009, 04:16 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Potomac River
Posts: 5,057
Re: 7mm AM vs .300 WM

I own a 7AM and for the purposes you describe, it hardly sounds like the cartridge of choice. It is best with a lot of barrel length to burn all of the powder. A 7mm AM is the ultimate ultra-long range 7mm. Kirby has a "small" green stocked 7AM he hunts with a lot and I do not know the weight of it. Maybe it meets your criteria. For a under 600 yard rifle for elk sized animals it would seem to me that the slightly smaller 7mm's would be easier to build a rifle to meet your specification and do the job just as well. I killed a near B&C wild bison with a 7 Wby. I don't think an eland or kudu is bigger than that.

So, if it was me and I was building a rifle for shooting animals under 1000 yards a 7STW is what I would compare to a 300 WM. I am a fan of the 7mm but I personally don't see much difference in killing ability of the two cartridges at the ranges you talk about.

Kirby does build a lot of rifles that are not Allen Mags, so it is not like he can't put in whatever chamber you would like.
__________________
The Smokin Fur Rifle Club
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-07-2009, 06:39 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 901
Re: 7mm AM vs .300 WM

Kirby built a 300WM for me on a Weatherby Vanguard action that is a great shooter! It would be hard to beat for your purposes.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-07-2009, 08:06 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pennsyltucky
Posts: 2,623
Re: 7mm AM vs .300 WM

i basically agree with everything said. my concept of a 7AM is it's a serious long range cartridge. my gut feeling is you don't have much experience with long range and i wouldn't recommend a 7AM. the 300WM is also a great cartridge, can do everything you want.

my suggestion would be to use the 325WSM. it will also do everything you want. bullet selection is not as good but you can probably find something that will work well. get the gun accurized and shoot it a year or so. then decide what you want to build.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Do You Shoot Rifle Competition?
YES - 33.67%
759 Votes
NO - 66.33%
1,495 Vote
Total Votes: 2,254
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC