close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics

Reply

6.5-284 vs. 264 Win Mag

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Unread 10-19-2010, 11:16 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,612
Re: 6.5-284 vs. 264 Win Mag

I have had my 264 stw for 11 or so years and shot many rounds through it and it still shoots good. I shoot the 130 grain scirrocos at over 3500 fps with it. It is a wicked long range 6.5 if that is what you are after. My wife was busting rocks at over 1000 yards with my 264 win mag and she likes it best. Says she can hold it more accurate with the less recoil. I like all of them. Just the faster ones are better on long range animals.
__________________
Predictions are difficult, especially when they involve the future

Last edited by Long Time Long Ranger; 10-20-2010 at 11:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
  •   #9  
    Unread 10-19-2010, 11:22 PM
    Gold Member
     
    Join Date: Oct 2006
    Location: Oregon City, OR
    Posts: 507
    Re: 6.5-284 vs. 264 Win Mag

    Both are great rounds, they burn barrels but any thing high performance does.

    Questions, do you have an action ready to go? If you have a Magnum Bolt face go with the 264win, standard go 6.5X284.

    65.x284 has great brass. A 140 VLD berger @ 3000 fps is amazing. Ring steel at 1500 yrds,

    Between the two, I go 6.5x284 all day...I actual did switch a 264 to a 6.5x284. I sold it at 400 rounds due to the throat moving .100. I wanted to get rid of it before it was total done. IT was still shooting in the .33 MOA.
    Reply With Quote

      #10  
    Unread 10-21-2010, 08:28 PM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Sep 2010
    Posts: 106
    Re: 6.5-284 vs. 264 Win Mag

    I do already have the action. Savage 111 with a magnum bolt face but that is not a factor. If i'm going to build it I want it to be the ultimate round.
    Reply With Quote
      #11  
    Unread 10-21-2010, 09:44 PM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Posts: 371
    Re: 6.5-284 vs. 264 Win Mag

    Owning rifles in both cartridges I would opt for the 6.5x284.

    It will kill everything the 264 Win can out to 1200 yds.

    50.0 grains of RL17 will fetch you 3,000 mv with a 140 Berger VLD.

    The 264's, and I love them, can be, in my experience and I've owned 3 of them,
    a more finicky cartridge for accuracy. In contrast the 6.5-284 seems easy to get
    there, with less recoil.

    Unless you plan on killing out past 1200 yards I seen no reason for a
    case that holds more than 70 grains of powder. In that case your recoil factor just went up.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrPQjJDkn0M

    Last edited by su37; 10-21-2010 at 09:50 PM.
    Reply With Quote
      #12  
    Unread 10-21-2010, 09:52 PM
    B23 B23 is offline
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Location: Spokane, Wa.
    Posts: 1,044
    Re: 6.5-284 vs. 264 Win Mag

    I have a Accumark 300Wby that I have been wanting to sell but if I don't sell it this thread has me seriously thinking about turning it into a 6.5-300RUM or maybe a 6.5-7RUM. Sure would make things alot easier to use the 7RUM case.

    Anyone know if anyone makes a 6.5-7RUM?
    Reply With Quote
      #13  
    Unread 10-21-2010, 10:02 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Jul 2004
    Location: OHIO
    Posts: 2,417
    Re: 6.5-284 vs. 264 Win Mag

    The only 6.5mm caliber that doesn't torch the throat that I'm aware of is the 260.

    I have 6.5x284s and this caliber is exceptionally accurate. Plus you can get Lapua brass. If you have any issue with belted cases, then the 264 mag isn't for you, but still a great caliber.

    My next 6.5mm caliber will be a 270 WSM necked down. Short, fat case, probably not as hard on the throat as other large capacity cases. Of course I'll try and research any negatives on it, such as feeding issues because I prefer repeaters, not single shots.

    If any of you gunsmiths have any knowledge on the 6.5WSM, let me know.
    __________________
    Derek M.
    Reply With Quote
      #14  
    Unread 10-21-2010, 10:37 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2008
    Location: Falls Church, VA
    Posts: 3,474
    Re: 6.5-284 vs. 264 Win Mag

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by su37 View Post
    Owning rifles in both cartridges I would opt for the 6.5x284.

    It will kill everything the 264 Win can out to 1200 yds.

    50.0 grains of RL17 will fetch you 3,000 mv with a 140 Berger VLD.
    My 260 with a 28" barrel gets 3000fps with the 140VLD with 44 grains of RL17.
    __________________
    I'm not gonna shoot here. I'm gonna shoot waaaaaaaay over there!
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes



    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC