Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics


Reply

6.5-284 or 264 win mag

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-03-2010, 11:52 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pocatello, ID
Posts: 368
6.5-284 or 264 win mag

Which one for a mid range hunting rifle out to 800 yrds?

Darrin
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-03-2010, 02:04 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 798
Re: 6.5-284 or 264 win mag

I have a .264 and I really like it. In fact about 20 minutes ago I smoked a coyote at 460 yards with it. If I was to do it again I would probably have a 6.5 built because its more efficient and better brass. Either one Im sure you would be happy.
__________________
Austin
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-04-2010, 07:49 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,070
Re: 6.5-284 or 264 win mag

I have a 264 Win mag that has a 27 3/4" Shilen barrel on it. That is all the length you could get out of a 28" blank. It is a screamer. 3350 fps with a 130 Nosler AB and Retumbo and perfect results on deer. I was getting over 3600 fps with 120 ballistic tips. I was afraid to use them on deer at that speed. Can you say evaporate on impact. Barrel length is your friend . I picked this rifle up almost new from my buddy, less than 60 rounds through it when I got it. The 6.5-284 is a more efficient round, (less powder usage) and you can get Lapua brass for it. I would have it built on a long action and use an 8 twist barrel if you want to use heaver bullets and have all the case to work with.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-04-2010, 08:57 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: McLean, Virginia
Posts: 985
Re: 6.5-284 or 264 win mag

I would also go for the 6.5-284. Proven track record in LR competition (very accurte) and great brass. For 800yards it would be an excellence choice. Personally I prefer a straight .284 win but that's just me.
__________________
"Out of range" is a theoretical concept as far as I'm concerned. Send it!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-04-2010, 10:07 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 372
Re: 6.5-284 or 264 win mag

264 win mag. 3% better performance with 20% more powder!!! No. Another vote for the 6.5-284. Nothing wrong really with the 264, I just don't like them because they are inefficient. But all magnums are and I like my 300. I have 2 6.5-284's and love them both.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-04-2010, 11:37 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pocatello, ID
Posts: 368
Re: 6.5-284 or 264 win mag

Awesome, looks like the new savage long range hunter in the 6.5x284 gets the vote. Thank you all for the reply's

Darrin
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-04-2010, 12:43 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 372
Re: 6.5-284 or 264 win mag

I have one and will promise that you will not be disappointed in that choice!! Never had a custom rifle of my own, but this is the most accurate rifle I have owned, bar none.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC