Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

.338 Lapua vs. .338 Edge

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-16-2010, 04:32 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Mandan, ND
Posts: 22
.338 Lapua vs. .338 Edge

What are you thoughts on these calibers?

Pros and Cons?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-16-2010, 04:38 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,615
Re: .338 Lapua vs. .338 Edge

Ballistics are identical. Go with the Lapua for the shorter case and several other benefits if money is not a factor. If your looking to save money go with the 338-300 ultramag. Both are awesome accurate and equal in velocity.
__________________
Predictions are difficult, especially when they involve the future
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-16-2010, 04:51 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Mandan, ND
Posts: 22
Re: .338 Lapua vs. .338 Edge

From what I have seen there is very little difference when comparing the price of the rifle. I found a shop that builds strictly lapuas and the price was real similar to the .338 edges that I have seen. Is the reloading more expensive because of the modifications to the case?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-16-2010, 05:03 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,817
Re: .338 Lapua vs. .338 Edge

I have 800 plus rounds through my 338 Lapua. I have several friends with the 338 Edge. As stated the ballistics are very similar.

The 338 Lapua I was able to buy dies off the shelf.

As far as loading costs, some will say the 338 Lapua is more expensive to load for due to the cost of the Lapua Brass. But the Lapua brass is of very high quality. I have 8 reloading on the 100 I started with and now some have 9. The primer pockest are still tight, and all feel the same when priming. I just checked the inside on several for wall thickness and found it to still be ok. I have not seen edge brass get close to this. So which is higher ??

Both are great rifles, you might want to look into what action it will take for your rifle. Some are better than others when going Lapua. I used a SS Weatherby Mark V and this rifle in very accurate.

Jeff
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-16-2010, 06:17 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 529
Re: .338 Lapua vs. .338 Edge

I am on the 8th load with some of my edge brass and have had no issues with the Remington Brass. If your chosen smith prefers one over the other, that is what i would choose. Case in point, Shawn carlock was building mine, so I never considered the Lapua (atleast not a lot!)because the edge is his baby. also, the edge can be built on a rem 700 action, not 100% sure, but dont think its recomended with the lapua.

either one would be a good choice!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-16-2010, 11:15 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,615
Re: .338 Lapua vs. .338 Edge

ndbwhunter, By cost I mean if you have a standard mag action then get the 338 RUM or 338-300 ultra barrel from Pac-Nor, screw it in and your good to go. Much cheaper than doing the Lapua unless you happen to have a wby mk 5 action or sako designed for the Lapua. Back in the 90's when I worked quite a bit with 338's off the Lapua and ultramag case the 338-300 ultra was the go to cartridge if a guy had a standard mag action and wanted a big 338 because he could do it cheaply. That was the beauty of the 338-300 ultramag. But if you are spending the money for a custom rifle the 338-300 ultra would not be a good choice because there are so many better choices if you want to spend custom dollars. In 2001 the 338 ultramag came out filling the same niche as the 338-300 ultra so not much need for that one anymore although I realize the fad of owning one seems to keep it alive for some reason. Just to many better choices out there in a custom. In the late 90's I spent a lot of time developing a great 338-300 ultra and built near a hundred of them back then. The introduction of the 338 RUM filled the same niche in an inexpensive rifle and with better choices in a custom me and most others dropped the 338-300 ultra in 2001.

With all the work I did back then shooting all the big 338's if you averaged all the data the lapua was probably 50 fps faster but so negligible I say they are equal along with the 338 RUM. If you did 10 of each there would not be 100 fps difference in the average accuracy load velocities between the three in same length barrels. If 100 fps makes a difference to a guy then get a big gun like one off the 378 wby or full length 416 case and go well beyond these three.

I have been there, done that and got the ball cap, tee shirt and coffee mug. Few people have the experience with specializing in the big 338's over the past 35 years as I have. I was there testing way before the 338's got to be the thing to have.

For some reason the ultramag case is extremely accurate in 30, 8mm.338, 358 and 375 calibers. It is just a natural and that maintains the popularity of the cartridge. But the Lapua is just as accurate and so are some others.
__________________
Predictions are difficult, especially when they involve the future
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-16-2010, 11:21 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: La Plata NM
Posts: 357
Re: .338 Lapua vs. .338 Edge

Quote:
Originally Posted by Broz View Post
I have 800 plus rounds through my 338 Lapua. I have several friends with the 338 Edge. As stated the ballistics are very similar.

The 338 Lapua I was able to buy dies off the shelf.

As far as loading costs, some will say the 338 Lapua is more expensive to load for due to the cost of the Lapua Brass. But the Lapua brass is of very high quality. I have 8 reloading on the 100 I started with and now some have 9. The primer pockest are still tight, and all feel the same when priming. I just checked the inside on several for wall thickness and found it to still be ok. I have not seen edge brass get close to this. So which is higher ??

Both are great rifles, you might want to look into what action it will take for your rifle. Some are better than others when going Lapua. I used a SS Weatherby Mark V and this rifle in very accurate.

Jeff

Broz,
Sorry to get off subject but I have a question for you. I just picked up a Rem 700P in 338 Lapua and I will be shooting the new Berger bullet and I was curious to what powder you are using and what seems to be the favorite with other Lapua shooters? It seems everyone is using either H1000 or Retumbo but I thought US869 might be a sleeper as it shines with heavy for caliber bullets and Hodgdon claims it is not sensitive to temperature changes.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: .338 Lapua vs. .338 Edge
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
338 Edge vs 338 Lapua ?? NorthernSniper Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 10 01-09-2013 06:49 PM
edge or lapua mag??? japple Long Range Hunting & Shooting 18 05-28-2010 04:51 AM
338 edge & 338 lapua cavtrooper94 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 14 06-08-2009 03:49 PM
338 lapua v. 338 edge diderr Long Range Hunting & Shooting 17 01-13-2008 09:18 PM
338 edge or Lapua rotorhead Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 15 11-26-2006 06:07 PM

Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 31.80%
69 Votes
NO - 51.61%
112 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 16.59%
36 Votes
Total Votes: 217
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC