Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

338 Cal 250 gr AB Range Report

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 07-07-2008, 10:18 AM
Official LRH Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fort Shaw, Montana
Posts: 6,796
Thanks for the report.

Its to bad the boys at Nosler would not listen to use and give us what we want. A 1-10 twist which is standard in the 338 would easily stabilize any accubond up to even a 280 gr version and BC would get up to where it should be.

As far as factory rifles not handling the longer bullets accurately, when was the last time you saw a 338 factory rifle in anything smaller then the 338 Win Mag? Oh ya, there is the 338 Fed. Course for that there are many lighter weight 338 Accubonds to choose from and a +250 gr bullet would not be applicable anyway.

A 300 gr Accubond would perform very well in the larger 338 magnums, BC would be very similiar to if not a bit more then the 300 gr SMK and and with dramatically improved terminal performance.

When was the last time you saw any 338 with a 1-10 not stabilize a 300 gr SMK??????

Seems Nosler just does not want to think out of the box. While I am on my soap box, why will noone make a 375 cal bullet over 300 grains from a major bullet maker. A 350 gr Accubond would be great and again, a 1-10 would be MORE Then enough and a 1-12 would work with most chamberings.

Nuff said, good results. Do some long range shooting and let us know if those BCs match up with actual bullet drops.
__________________
Kirby Allen(50)

Allen Precision Shooting
Home of the Allen Magnum, Allen Xpress and Allen Tactical Wildcats and the Painkiller Muzzle brakes.

Farther, Faster and Flatter then ever before.

Web Page: www.apsrifles.com

allenmagnum@gmail.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-07-2008, 01:09 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SW Texas
Posts: 286
300 accubond

When Nosler went from the 225 to the 250, BC went from 0.550 to 0.575. At that rate the 300 might be 0.625. They've got to put a longer ogive and boatail and not just increase the bearing surface to make a really long range bullet. The Etips have such a long bearing surface that you have to use less powder. They need a longer ogive as well. I suppose there might be accuracy issues as with the VLDs if Nosler did that.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-07-2008, 01:18 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mukilteo, WA
Posts: 1,091
Actually, just keeping the same nose and tail as the 225 and a 300 grain would have well over .7 BC. Not from the bearing surface, but the increase in weight.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-07-2008, 01:42 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SW Texas
Posts: 286
JonA:

Do you think the 225 and 250 have the same nose and tail profile? If they do, I don't see how a 300 would be over 0.7 without a longer ogive. If BC were proportional to bullet wt: 300/225 x 0.550 = 0.733. So I think that is where you are coming from. But using that to compare the 225 and 250 gives: 250/225 x 0.550 = 0.611 rather than the actual of 0.575.

I still think you probably need a longer ogive, but maybe not. Maybe the 250 has a shorter ogive than the 225.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-07-2008, 02:02 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mukilteo, WA
Posts: 1,091
I'm thinking if those numbers are accurate they may have blunted the ogive on the 250 a bit to keep it shorter, but I don't know. Though I'm not all that sure of their testing procedures of late anyway. For a while they had the 8mm 200 AB rated at a lower BC than the 338 200 AB which told me not to put too much faith in their numbers. It could be it's just slightly under rated or maybe just not as favorably rated as the 225.

Regardless, it should be a good bullet.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-07-2008, 02:55 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Western MI
Posts: 716
I believe that the 250 gr AB has the same ogive and boat tail as the 225 gr AB.


JD338
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-07-2008, 04:09 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SW Texas
Posts: 286
JD338:

I think that makes sense. Adding weight in the middle of the bullet while keeping the nose and boattail the same will increase the BC by a modest amount. To really increase the BC of a heavy bullet you have to lenghten the ogive in proportion to the incease in weight or even more. You cann't just add weight in the middle of the bullet. I suspect it is more expensive to lenghten all proportions of the bullet.

If you really want a high BC bullet, and I do, keep the same bearing surface as the 225 while doubling the length of the ogive and boattail. Now we're talking a long range bullet. But the only bullet makers doing that are the custom makers of the Al tipped bullets. Guess I'll buy theirs if we can get a reliable supply, they are accurate, and they perform on game.

Just my take...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: 338 Cal 250 gr AB Range Report
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SA .284 Win - Range Report heikki02003 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 11 10-16-2012 01:52 PM
MCR 7mm WSM range report jmason Long Range Hunting & Shooting 7 02-08-2011 09:19 PM
.308 Range report sniperjwt Long Range Hunting & Shooting 24 07-30-2010 03:27 PM
range report retiredcpo Reloading 1 03-08-2010 10:34 PM
.222 rem/55g SX range report remingtonman_25_06 Reloading 7 05-16-2007 09:28 AM

Current Poll
Spot & Stalk or Ambush For Western Deer?
MOSTLY - Spot & Stalk - 73.71%
1,026 Vote
MOSTLY - Ambush - 26.29%
366 Votes
Total Votes: 1,392
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC