close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics

Reply

338/284 ??

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 02-09-2010, 09:49 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 23
338/284 ??

Looking for a second barrel on a short action and considered a 338 Federal ... then I came across the 338/284... it seems to fall above the Fed and near the 338/06 (?)
Having seen some figures that looked at the top end of efficient I wondered if anyone has any real hands on feedback on the 338/284 ??
Many thanks for any replies.
Reply With Quote
  •   #2  
    Unread 02-10-2010, 07:02 AM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: Tucson Az
    Posts: 2,025
    Re: 338/284 ??

    While I cannot give you an answer from personal experience I can suggest a few things.

    A while back I considered rechambering a 358 win to 358/284. I necked up the 284 and did a comparison of case volume by filling each with water. The gain would be so small that it wasn't worth the cost of a custom reamer and dies not to mention the gunsmithing costs.

    You can do the same with the 338 federal vs the 338/284. Once you get the numbers for how much water each case holds find out the percentage increase for the 338/284. Then divide that number by 4 and you will get the approximate increase in velocity.

    I would suggest an easier way. Make a 338 RCM. It IS exactly the same volume as the 338-06. Dies, brass are available at very reasonable prices. You will need a reamer which is approx $140 from Pacific tool and gauge. How do I know? I am in the process of making one. Waiting for the new barrel.
    Reply With Quote

      #3  
    Unread 02-10-2010, 01:52 PM
    Junior Member
     
    Join Date: Dec 2006
    Posts: 23
    Re: 338/284 ??

    AZshooter thanks for the info: using your approach it suggests that some of the data I found could be over-optomistic!
    As to the RCM it looks ideal, but I think over here it would fall into rare to mythical category!
    Fortunately this project is on slow-cook
    Again thanks for your time and experience.
    Reply With Quote
      #4  
    Unread 02-10-2010, 03:12 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: Tucson Az
    Posts: 2,025
    Re: 338/284 ??

    It isn't my approach, it is John Barsness who came up with the volume comparison and the 1/4th velocity bit....
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes



    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 AM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC