Long Range Hunting - Magazine & Forums

Go Back   Long Range Hunting - Magazine & Forums > Rifles, Equipment, Optics, Hardware, Gadgets > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics
Home Forums Articles Product Reviews Outdoor News Outdoor Tips Rules & FAQ Shop Cabelas Member Map Register Mark Forums Read

Click to register now Click to register now Click to register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-09-2004, 04:18 AM
Senior Member
Find Me on the Map
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hermiston, Oregon
Posts: 1,519
300 RUM, 220g SMK range results

I got a chance to test out some new loads for my .300 RUM. It is a Rem 700 LSS. Complete factory except trigger down to 2 3/4 lbs. I tested the 220g SMK and H-1000. The first load I tested a while back was 82.4g of H-1000, Fed 215, 3.66" and the others were at 3.670". The 3.66" load shot 1 inch with all 3 shots being evenly placed horizontally. The 3.670" put 2 shots touching and the 3rd a flyer 1 inch low. They were chronographing at 2785fps. After doing more research and asking some questions, I found a new starting point. I went up to 88g of H-1000 since several people were going up to 92.5 and 92 grains, I felt 88g was a good place to start. I also made a switch in primers to see if they would make any difference. I used CCI BR-2 primers. Loads go as follows

88g H-1000 First 2 shots were damn near 1
CCI BR-2 hole. The 3rd was the 3051fps
3.75" and it was a flyer at 1 inch
3020fps high and 1 inch left.
3021fps
3051fps

90g H-1000 It was a 2 inch group in the
CCI BR-2 form of a triangle. It just
3.75" didn't shoot.
3098fps
3092fps
3113fps

91g H-1000 First 2 shots were damn near
CCI BR-2 touching. 3rd shot was a big
3.725" flyer at 1.5 inches low and 2
3075fps inches left.
3072fps
3065fps

92g H-1000 1st and 3rd shot were 1/2 inch
CCI BR-2 2nd shot was a flyer at 1 inch
3.735" low and 2 inches right.
3109fps
3101fps
3098fps

That was all that I tested. I dont really know what load to use. The difference in fps between 88g and 92g is only about 75fps. They all seem to be somewhat consistent. The 91g load had a spread of 10fps. The 92g load had a spread of 11fps. The other 2 had 2 shots real close and consistent, group wise also, but the 88g and 90g load each had the 1 bad one in the group for velocity. I think what I will do is work with the 88g load as 3025fps for the 220g SMK is plenty fast for my 26" barrel. I will work with seating depth A LOT. Maybe switch primers, but I think I want to stay around 87-89g and 3000fps and an OAL of 3.75" Note: It is being used as a single shot as the length will not permit it to fit in the magazine box. If anybody has any oppinions or anything they want to throw in, I would appreciate it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Rock Bottom Deals at Cabela's

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Content Management
All content ©2007 Len Backus
Ad Management by RedTyger
Skin by: MPDesignZ.com