Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

.270WSM vs. 6.5 WSM

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-23-2012, 06:23 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 53
.270WSM vs. 6.5 WSM

I may have posted something along these lines before but now I can't find the thread. I have a savage .270WSM I'm planning on building it into my long range rig. I really like the idea of a 6.5 cal. and it should be easy to size brass from 270wsm. My question is if anyone has any experience loading for this round and also what kind of stocks anyone is using for savage builds? Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-24-2012, 07:22 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 84
Re: .270WSM vs. 6.5 WSM

I would stick with the 270 WSM and try 165 matrix VLD's you will be impressed(.650g1bc), I have a 6.5 WSM and it's a great round but I built it before there were high bc 270 bullets. I killed a cow elk Mon. with the 6.5 at 1100 yds using a 140 Berger VLD hunting bullet at 3125fps, so I know it is an effective cartridge however the 270 WSM with a 165 matrix at 2975fps arrives at 1100 yds with roughly 150 more foot pounds and just slightly more drop. I just put this 270 WSM combination together for a friend and it shoots great.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-24-2012, 08:30 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SW Montana
Posts: 4,435
Re: .270WSM vs. 6.5 WSM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nieko View Post
I would stick with the 270 WSM and try 165 matrix VLD's you will be impressed(.650g1bc), I have a 6.5 WSM and it's a great round but I built it before there were high bc 270 bullets. I killed a cow elk Mon. with the 6.5 at 1100 yds using a 140 Berger VLD hunting bullet at 3125fps, so I know it is an effective cartridge however the 270 WSM with a 165 matrix at 2975fps arrives at 1100 yds with roughly 150 more foot pounds and just slightly more drop. I just put this 270 WSM combination together for a friend and it shoots great.
+1 I shoot a 270 WSM with the Matrix running 3060 fps and my dad runs a 6.5 Sherman with the 140 running 3140 fps and ballistics are real close until you look at energy and the big one is momentum, he can shoot a light steel plate at a 1000 yards and not scratch it or move it and I dang near shoot through it and flip it around. When the 170 Berger arrives it will be just that much sweeter!!!

My WSM is on a Savage and it's currently in a B&C Varmint stock and it's OK but kinda a club, there are a lot of stocks to look at for the Savage but I think mine is going into a Manners MCS-T.
__________________
High Fence, Low Fence, Stuck in the Fence, if I can Tag it and Eat it, it's Hunting!

"Pain is weakness leaving your body"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-24-2012, 01:15 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 312
Re: .270WSM vs. 6.5 WSM

Yep the new 170gr Berger when it arrives will set the 270 WSM alight
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-24-2012, 06:44 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 53
Re: .270WSM vs. 6.5 WSM

Thanks for all the great info I'm not super concerned with down range energy. I have a 300 WSM for the heavy stuff but I'm more looking for light recoil and good killing power for varmints and deer sized game out to 700 yards. I was thinking about building the gun around the barrel contour of the factory tube so I can interchange and have both but that seems like a bit of a pain. If anyone has 6.5 loads that they are fond of I would be interested in knowing what is working, planning on going with a 26'' tube. Thanks again.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-24-2012, 07:13 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SW Montana
Posts: 4,435
Re: .270WSM vs. 6.5 WSM

Outlaw6.0 has a shiny new 6.5 WSM you may find interesting!! What's nice about the 270 WSM is you can zip out say a 110TTSX at 3600fps for the close range deer and varmints then load'er up with the heavies and have the heavy hitter all in one package, though everyone should have a 6.5 IMO
__________________
High Fence, Low Fence, Stuck in the Fence, if I can Tag it and Eat it, it's Hunting!

"Pain is weakness leaving your body"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-25-2012, 12:50 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 53
Re: .270WSM vs. 6.5 WSM

Thanks Bigngreen. I have been itching for a 6.5 for a while now and was pretty much set on a savage long hunter in 6.5-284 Norma but this summer this savage model 10 270WSM fell in my lap for 300 bones. I figured at that price it would be a great place to start a build. I like the idea of the 270 but I'm not sure if my tube has a fast enough twist to run the big bullets.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: .270WSM vs. 6.5 WSM
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
264 WM or 270WSM brinky Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 3 02-05-2012 12:08 PM
270wsm darrindlh Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 19 11-30-2011 08:34 PM
270wsm 150 grn SST kiwicharlie Reloading 9 05-15-2011 10:11 PM
110 V-Max out of 270WSM Iron Worker Reloading 3 04-11-2010 05:17 PM
First elk with the 270WSM bigngreen Long Range Hunting & Shooting 9 12-04-2009 10:06 PM

Current Poll
Do you wear hearing protection while hunting?

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC