Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

.270 WSM v .300WSM

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 10-10-2004, 08:15 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Eastern,USA
Posts: 6
Re: .270 WSM v .300WSM

Sure does sound tempting to me also....but will you use it...or just admire it
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-14-2004, 05:44 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Castle colorado
Posts: 791
Re: .270 WSM v .300WSM

Oh, I'll use it alright. I've got a Zeiss 3.5-10 and Talley mounts on the way, and it'll see some coyote hunting this winter as an excuse to get out and use it. I plan to take it elk hunting next year too. Every now and then I will lay it out along side the two Coopers I hunt with and pet them. Gotta treat 'em right. I really enjoy hunting with a beautiful rifle.

[ 10-14-2004: Message edited by: COBrad ]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-15-2004, 05:50 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fredericksburg VA
Posts: 4,128
Re: .270 WSM v .300WSM

CoBrad

Helped a factory class shooter this year at a match with a 270WSM. He had loaded 150 Barnes and had no idea what it would do at 100 much less 1000.

We got him zero'd at 1000 in about 5 rounds and he went on to shoot a 10" group with the 270WSM.

Think it is a perfect round for what you are wanting.

BH
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-18-2004, 12:23 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hermiston, Oregon
Posts: 2,005
Re: .270 WSM v .300WSM

Well folks, I still have not found a load that will group under 1 inch out of my .270 WSM. It is a Savage 16 FS. I have not done anything to the rifle except trigger work but this particular rifle is just not accurate. I have tried over 5 powders, 6 different bullets, from 130-150, 3 different primers, lengths from shortest to longest. I cant seem to find any kind of pattern to help with loads. Shoots Magpro and 140's into about 4 inches at 100 yards. The only thing that gets me is that if it was a "two shot" rifle, it would be excellent. More than half my loads would be alright then because I can get 2 shots either touching or 1/2". Usually it will be the 3rd shot that wanders off so damn far. I let the barrel cool 2-3 minutes before shooting the next shot. Dont really know what to do. I'm about to give up on the thing. I'm just thinking its a Savage thing. This is the 1st Savage in our house, and will probly be the last. I have never ever in my 7 years of loading have had this much trouble trying to obtain a 1 inch 3 shot group out of a rifle. Hell even ALL of my Rugers I have ever owned after that trigger pull was down, I could find a load within a 1 powder and bullet combo. Savage is just something else, maybe I got a bad one. Am not really willing to give them another chance. Just one of those things. I love the .270 WSM cartridge, BETTER than the .270 weatherby. I have gotten 3550fps with the 130's and 3400fps with 140's. Those velocities are max with some of my loads out of a 24" tube. I have tried slowing them down all to no avail. Either bottom or top loads will usually always put 2 holes close but fly the other one. I should just try to sell it, but its a Savage, nobody wants them where I live. Get a Winchester or Browning and start working up again. BTW my dad bought the Winchester Black Shadow in .270 from Wal-Mart and guess what, I found a load for that with what I wanted to the first time. Magpro and 140g SST@3300. 3/4" of an inch without extensive testing. I would say I have been through extensive testing in my own Savage .270 wsm and have not even came close to 3/4" group. I have tried probly close to 100 loads out of my Savage, while it took me only a couple to find the one for my dads Winchester. I guess the long and short of the story is that if given another rifle, I would be a lot happier person, but the caliber is awesome. One I would recomend, only NOT in a Savage.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-19-2004, 03:20 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New Castle colorado
Posts: 791
Re: .270 WSM v .300WSM

Just got off the phone with Becky over at Sporting Arms. Kimber has not yet shipped my rifle, but guarantees one will come. Supposed to hear back tomorrow when it will ship. I've been watching a few sites online, and spoke with one other Kimber dealer, and have been surprised at how fast the .270's sell. If I can find a load that will shoot 1 moa out of the rifle I'll be satisfied. Remingtonman, it does sound like you may have a rifle that is just not going to shoot. I am curious though, have you considered having the rifle bedded? My daughter shoots a 7-08 Savage, and the action binds terribly in the stock. Poorest fit that I have ever seen. She still shoots around 2" at 100 yds from a sitting position. This winter I'm going to attempt my first bedding job on that rifle.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-20-2004, 07:14 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 250
Re: .270 WSM v .300WSM

Remingtonman ,
Unfortunately there's often a lot more to rifle accuracy than just experimentation with loads . In any case , 100 rounds isn't really a lot of experimentation .
Suggest you try a bedding job first , then if that doesn't work get the barrel recrowned and locking lugs lapped .If it still won't shoot then you'll probably need to look at barrel replacement and action truing .
Nearly all factory rifles will require bedding properly in order to give CONSISTENT small groups and hold their zero . Remingtons , Winchesters and Brownings are no better than Savages in this regard .To avoid disappointment I have my rifles professionally bedded before they are ever fired .
If you sell your Savage in the belief that all Winchesters or Brownings automatically shoot small groups then I reckon you could be the disappointed one. My (bedded) Model 70 7mm WSM shoots 1.2 inch (5 shot) groups and realistically I didn't expect much better . My Remington VSSF wouldn't do better than 1.25 inches until rebarrelled .
If you really hate the Savage then best chance for an accurate WSM rifle straight from the factory would be Tikka or Sako unless you want to spend serious money .
BTW , I'm glad I wasn't standing nearby when you were shooting 130 grainers out of that thing at 3550 FPS . That has got to be HOT . Could you get a fired round back in the chamber after ejecting ? [img]images/icons/shocked.gif[/img] Factory loads in the WSM's (using Magpro)operate at around 65000 PSI . You can't safely add 250 + FPS with the same powder in these cartridges. They're close to full throttle as is .
What velocity were your starting loads ? My 7mm shoots a lot better with 140 gn pills at 3150 FPS than 3200 or more .
Would be in your own best interest to sell the Savage and get a more powerful rifle if safe WSM velocities don't blow your hair back .

[ 10-20-2004: Message edited by: Aussie ]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-20-2004, 11:40 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fredericksburg VA
Posts: 4,128
Re: .270 WSM v .300WSM

Rem

got to agree with Ausiee. sound like a problem with either bedding or scope.

Change scopes first to make sure it is not the scope and then bed it.

BH
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: .270 WSM v .300WSM
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wts/wtt 300wsm wfjames Guns For Sale 9 10-14-2010 07:31 PM
7-300wsm 65joe Reloading 6 06-30-2010 03:20 PM
7mm wsm 300wsm TOP_PREDATOR Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 4 06-22-2010 09:23 AM
WTS Win Mod 70 SS 300WSM snpr700 Guns For Sale 0 02-05-2010 12:33 AM
300WSM Slopeshunter The Basics, Starting Out 10 06-12-2006 01:49 AM

Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 29.81%
48 Votes
NO - 55.28%
89 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 14.91%
24 Votes
Total Votes: 161
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC