Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics


Reply

.270 Vs. .308

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-07-2010, 01:28 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 100
.270 Vs. .308

New member, first post, so be gentle!

I have two favorite rifles, a .308 and .270. Both BDL's. They are hunting rifles of course. I not a rookie to shooting but I have never really gotten to in depth. However, when looking some ballistic tables it seems to me that a 140Grn 270 is generally pretty close to a 150grn .308. Of course there are many variables, but i was looking at the Hornady Superformance SST and GMX's. Although the wieghts are different, velocity and energy is about the same. I dont know a thing about BC and sectional density. A 400 yard shot is max for me so whatever a .270 can do, cant a .308 do ? (sorry Mr. O'Connor).

The .308 seems to hit as hard, but less recoil? Why is it not used as often as .270 for hunting?

Thanks,

RS
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-07-2010, 05:18 AM
Miller Outdoors
 
Posts: n/a
Re: .270 Vs. .308

Quote:
Originally Posted by RemingtonShooter View Post
The .308 seems to hit as hard, but less recoil? Why is it not used as often as .270 for hunting?
That's a difficult question to answer, as personal tastes are quite subjective.

It's difficult to do a 'which is better' comparison between two different calibers - especially when there is such a significant difference in bullet sizes. Making it even more difficult is the fact that the .308 is a short action and the .270 is a long action.

In my opinion, the .308 is superior because it can shoot heavier bullets, uses less powder/has less kick, can utilize higher BC bullets (more earodynamic) and is notoriously accurate at long ranges, but it really depends on what the particular gun's application is. Off the top of my head I can think of no instance where I'd choose a .270 over the .308, but I'm kinda biased to begin with.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-07-2010, 08:34 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,542
Re: .270 Vs. .308

I'm not so sure the 270 is a more popular hunting cartridge, alot of folks hunt with the 308. I prefer 308, many more bullet choices, less recoil, with the right setup in the right hands...very accurate. Pretty popular on the competition scene too.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-07-2010, 09:27 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SW Montana
Posts: 4,530
Re: .270 Vs. .308

For inside 400 yrd there's not much difference, the 270 will have more energy, velocity and less drop and wind drift so it's better in every way that I can see, but I'm very biased to the 270 cal stuff. The 270 just kills stuff that is why it is still alive and well, I read an article in a mag that took record book entries and broke them down by cal and specie and the 270 is still a top killer, more game is taken only with the 7mm, if I recall correctly.
Recoil will be less in the 270 driving a 140gr bullet at the same speed than a 150 gr 30 cal. If you romp on it it will recoil more but all things the same except bullet weight the heavier bullet will recoil more.
I only know one guy who shoots a 308 and he only packs it if he thinks he will be shooting inside 200yrds other wise he packs a larger cal.
__________________
High Fence, Low Fence, Stuck in the Fence, if I can Tag it and Eat it, it's Hunting!

"Pain is weakness leaving your body"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-07-2010, 09:39 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Florence, MS
Posts: 43
Re: .270 Vs. .308

Comparatively a 270 against a 308 is like everyone says it is preference choice. I prefer a 270 which is what I have been shooting for about 15 years and I have shot a 308, but to me a 270 does more for me than a 308 cause it can go longer, shoot flatter, in the long run to me it is cheaper.

True a 308 can do more damage at a certain distance cause of the bigger heavier bullet, but also think about this if in some instance you have a shot at a target that is 1500 yards out from you and you are on an angle from above it which would you rather have a round such as a 308 that is going to drop sooner than the 270 round so you have to aim a lot higher than normal and might not have the velocity to impact or a round such as the 270 that loses velocity and drop at a lot farther distance than the 308 and can impact your target, now true it may not do as much damage as the 308 overall but your target will be hit and may run, but definitely for sure is going to bleed and die.

Also on a side note I shoot competitively and there were people who thought I couldn't do crap with a 270 in competition against a 308, but I showed them and beat some of them as well.

Last edited by LordScythe; 07-07-2010 at 09:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-07-2010, 09:59 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Blackfoot, Idaho
Posts: 8,178
Re: .270 Vs. .308

The 308 Win cartridge is popular because of the number of them as a result of the NATO designation. There are many used for match competition. There are many bullet offerings for the .308 WIn.

On the other hand, the 270 Win started life as a game hunting cartridge and was popularized by Mr. O'Connor. Actually I think it was a clunker in those days, but so were most other cartridges of that ilk.

The 308 has many uses as does the 270 Win. However the .308 just ain't as sexy as the 270.

Neither cartridge is a 1000 yard big game getter, in my opinion.

I don't know of a bullet for the 270 Win, currently offered that approaches a bc of 0.600. That is a bummer. The 270 Win will push a 150 gr bullet as fast as a 308 will. Give that bullet a bc over 0.600 and it won't even be a contest.

Come up with a 160 gr offering with a > 0.600 bc and the 270 WSM becomes what a 270 WSM should be. Oops, drifted off there for a bit.

My first "Western" rifle was a 270 Win for shooting everything from chucks to elk. It did well. 90 grain Sierras for chucks an yotes to beyond 400 yards. 130 Sierras for deer. Same for moose. Never did shot an elk with it. Many mule deer.

My first "Eastern" rifle was a 7MM Mauser. The 30-30 of the world. Could only get 170 gr bullets from the factory. Another bummer.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-07-2010, 11:38 PM
dwm dwm is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 621
Re: .270 Vs. .308

How fast could you drive the 270 cal - 169.5 gr ULD RBBT (BC in the .740 range) with a .270Win?

My 270 has a short barrel (for now), I have a H4350 load that shoots 140 Accubonds great.
__________________
doug
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC