LongRangeHunting.com



Go Back   LongRangeHunting.com > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics
Home Forums Articles Product Reviews Outdoor News Outdoor Tips Rules & FAQ Member Map Register Mark Forums Read

Welcome, Guest! Please Register or Login:

  

Members have access to more features, including search and "New Posts". It's free, what are you waiting for?
Reply

.270 Boat tail VS Non Boat tail

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-01-2004, 03:08 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 9
.270 Boat tail VS Non Boat tail

What is the difference in the two. I have heard that boat tails fly better than the non?
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 11-01-2004, 03:50 PM
Senior Member
Find Me on the Map
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,446
Re: .270 Boat tail VS Non Boat tail

Actually, the opposite is often true. Most benchrest shooters who shoot out to 200yds or so, regularely shoot flatbase bullets. Flatbase bullets are easier for the manufacturer to make consistent.

In factory chambers with looong freebores the flat base bullet may shoot better because you can seat the bullet out a bit farther and still m,aintain good neck tension. Obviously, the tails of boattail bullets provide zero neck tension and may limit the cartridge OAL.

The benefit to boattail bullets doesn't really begin until you are shoooting out past 400yds. For most hunting this isn't an issue. Lastly, boattail hunting bullets have a greater tendancy to suffer from jacket/core separation after impact. However, the newer bonded core bullets should eliminate this problem if you choose them.

[ 11-01-2004: Message edited by: Varmint Hunter ]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-01-2004, 04:10 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona Mountains
Posts: 50
Re: .270 Boat tail VS Non Boat tail

Varmint Hunter

I agree with every thing you said except for one thing (there's always one thing isn't there [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img] ). A lot of world class and hall of fame BR shooters use BT bullets. I guess it's a case of "shoot what works".

Ray
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-01-2004, 04:32 PM
Senior Member
Find Me on the Map
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,446
Re: .270 Boat tail VS Non Boat tail

AGREED

My point was that boattail bullets are not
necessarily more accurate. If they were, all benchrest shooters would be using them.

I'd venture to say that most PPC shooters are shooting flatbase bullets, but thats just a guess. [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img]

VH

[ 11-01-2004: Message edited by: Varmint Hunter ]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-01-2004, 06:12 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona Mountains
Posts: 50
Re: .270 Boat tail VS Non Boat tail

Varmint Hunter

This time I agree with everything you said. No exceptions. [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-01-2004, 06:19 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 9
Re: .270 Boat tail VS Non Boat tail

Thanks for the info. Could you give me an example of some bonded core bullets?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-01-2004, 07:14 PM
Senior Member
Find Me on the Map
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,446
Re: .270 Boat tail VS Non Boat tail

3 bonded core bullets that come immediately to mind are the Nosler Accubond, Hornady Interbond & Swift Scirocco. They all look like Ballistic Tips and they're all boattails. [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2007 LenBackus.net, LLC