Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

264 WM vs. 260

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-06-2012, 03:52 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 192
264 WM vs. 260

First off, why do we not see a lot of mention or many people shooting the 264 win mag?

Secondly, what are the pros and cons to these 2? How do the balistics compare compared to powder consumption?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-06-2012, 06:23 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC, oceanfront
Posts: 3,164
Re: 264 WM vs. 260

You must realize the 264WM is so large as to be completely uncomparable to a 260rem..
+26gr over a 260, which already holds plenty of capacity for the heaviest in 26cal bullets.
+17gr over a 6.5x55, the edge of practical.
+14gr over a 6.5-284, which is a barrel burner.

Well, there is no doubt a 264 could kill pretty much anything!
Does that help?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-06-2012, 06:37 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southwest Virginia
Posts: 122
Re: 264 WM vs. 260

The 264 WM is a wonderful deer cartridge with ballistic capabilities which allow it to dip into other game (varmints- elk). It has as much muzzle energy as a 30-06 but carries it further with a flatter trajectory.

Now, can it be too much of a good thing? For some, yes! For those that understand that it needs a long barrel 26"+, slow powders, and can be temperamental to reload, its simply 6.5mm bliss.
__________________
Learning every day.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-06-2012, 09:46 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SOCIALIST CONTROLLED TERRITORY OF NEW YORK
Posts: 4,388
Re: 264 WM vs. 260

Quote:
Originally Posted by drenner43 View Post
First off, why do we not see a lot of mention or many people shooting the 264 win mag?

Secondly, what are the pros and cons to these 2? How do the balistics compare compared to powder consumption?
lots of guys have them here. I have one in the works. I think there are about 3 threads about the 264 right now.
__________________
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf"
If you want to shoot Bergers start here!
http://www.longrangehunting.com/arti...accuracy-1.php
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-06-2012, 11:03 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pocahontas, AR
Posts: 876
Re: 264 WM vs. 260

The first thing is you need to figure out your goals. Do you want a volume shooter for targets & big game, if so the 260.
Do you want a high performance long range Big Game rifle, 3500fps with 120 instead of 3050, 3200 with a 140 or 2700fps & results that follow.

It's all application driven instead of which is "better".

I just got a 264WM & the case cap./barrel life doesn't mean Doggy poop, as I have a 300WM & 25/06AI to share the burden & have volume rounds too.

So, trying to asswer this question doesn't mean much without knowing what you want to do with the rifle.
__________________
You will not make peace with the Blue Coats, you are free to go.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-08-2012, 11:02 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Patagonia Mountains, Arizona
Posts: 752
Re: 264 WM vs. 260

I don't think the contest is between the 260Rem and the 264 Win Mag.

There's more of a contest is between the 260 Rem, 7mm-08, and 308 Win.
Where the 260 Rem gives long range and low wind deflection while the the 7mm-08 and 308 trade that off for shorter range energy.

The situation changes with the 264 Win mag, the 7mm Rem Mag, and the 300 Win Mag
The larger case can provide enough energy to drive the heavier high BC bullets well beyond 1000 yards with more retained energy. With higher velocity the wind deflection and drop differences are less apparent between them.

Of those six cartridges the 264 WM is definitely the hardest on barrels. It's acceptable if it's used for hunting, but it makes one not want to use it for practice. That really does make a difference when selecting a rifle.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-08-2012, 03:08 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 192
Re: 264 WM vs. 260

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikecr View Post
You must realize the 264WM is so large as to be completely uncomparable to a 260rem..
+26gr over a 260, which already holds plenty of capacity for the heaviest in 26cal bullets.
+17gr over a 6.5x55, the edge of practical.
+14gr over a 6.5-284, which is a barrel burner.

Well, there is no doubt a 264 could kill pretty much anything!
Does that help?
I knew the .264 had more capacity but I had no idea how much whatsoever.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomosendero View Post
The first thing is you need to figure out your goals. Do you want a volume shooter for targets & big game, if so the 260.
Do you want a high performance long range Big Game rifle, 3500fps with 120 instead of 3050, 3200 with a 140 or 2700fps & results that follow.

It's all application driven instead of which is "better".

I just got a 264WM & the case cap./barrel life doesn't mean Doggy poop, as I have a 300WM & 25/06AI to share the burden & have volume rounds too.

So, trying to asswer this question doesn't mean much without knowing what you want to do with the rifle.
I wasn't really asking which is better. In this game I don't really feel there is ever a "better". There are so many factory and wildcat cartridges available that it's all relative and more a choice of opinion and preference that what is "better".

I was more so asking about the pros and cons of each.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LouBoyd View Post
I don't think the contest is between the 260Rem and the 264 Win Mag.

There's more of a contest is between the 260 Rem, 7mm-08, and 308 Win.
Where the 260 Rem gives long range and low wind deflection while the the 7mm-08 and 308 trade that off for shorter range energy.

The situation changes with the 264 Win mag, the 7mm Rem Mag, and the 300 Win Mag
The larger case can provide enough energy to drive the heavier high BC bullets well beyond 1000 yards with more retained energy. With higher velocity the wind deflection and drop differences are less apparent between them.

Of those six cartridges the 264 WM is definitely the hardest on barrels. It's acceptable if it's used for hunting, but it makes one not want to use it for practice. That really does make a difference when selecting a rifle.
Thanks for the info. I was looking into the 6.5mm game and just wanted some pros and cons of each.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
How Many Different Cartridges Do You Reload For?
ZERO, all factory ammo - 7.99%
349 Votes
1 - 2.79%
122 Votes
2 or 3 - 14.55%
636 Votes
4 or 5 - 20.32%
888 Votes
6 or 7 - 14.87%
650 Votes
8 or 9 - 8.67%
379 Votes
10 or more - 30.80%
1,346 Vote
Total Votes: 4,370
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC