close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics

Reply

.264 WM, 260 rem, or what else?

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 02-24-2014, 12:36 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Sterling City, Texas
Posts: 31
.264 WM, 260 rem, or what else?

I have an old .270 that I am really wanting to make into a serious longrange rifle. Since the rifle is already a long action, is there any reason not to go with the .264? Or are the other rounds more inherently accurate? Could aftermarket barrel choice be a factor in this as well?
Reply With Quote
  •   #2  
    Unread 02-24-2014, 12:40 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Location: Alabama
    Posts: 9,247
    Re: .264 WM, 260 rem, or what else?

    The .264 WinMag uses a magnum bolt face and magnum magazine follower. The .270 uses a standard bolt face and follower.

    If you are wanting to build a .264 WinMag (which is an awesome caliber, BTW) I would look for a good used Remington 700 BDL or SPS in 7mm Rem Mag or .300 WinMag to use as a donor.

    Since your rifle has a standard bolt face, I would look to the .280 Ackley Improved 40* shoulder. You can pick up the .280 AI dies, reamer, brass, and ammo from Midway USA.
    __________________
    "I'm just a peckerwood who lives in the hills with too many guns..." - Bob Lee Swagger

    "Give me a minute...I'm good. Give me an hour...I'm great. Give me 6 months...And I'm unbeatable." - Col. Hannibal Smith

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by WildRose View Post
    The 284 is to the STW what a tricycle is to a Ninja.
    Reply With Quote

      #3  
    Unread 02-24-2014, 12:51 PM
    Bronze Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2014
    Location: Sterling City, Texas
    Posts: 31
    Re: .264 WM, 260 rem, or what else?

    I have always wondered why there is no factory long action 6.5 rounds, like a standardized 6.5-06 easily available.
    Reply With Quote
      #4  
    Unread 02-24-2014, 01:02 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Jun 2013
    Location: Tip Top of West Virginia
    Posts: 1,258
    Re: .264 WM, 260 rem, or what else?

    If you are interested in .264s, look into the 6.5-06 or the Ackley Improved version. This is an extremely accurate cartridge and the only thing that would need modified is your barrel of course. The velcity of this round falls right in between the .260 and .264 Winchester and would be a great choice. The 6.5 Sherman is also another option, performance is like the 6.5-06 Ackley. If you're not dead set on a 6.5 you could look at a .270 Sherman or Ackley. Like MudRunner suggested, the .280 Ackley is another great option. You have a ton of choices out there, just have to narrow down what you can get components for, what will be easiest to work with what you have, and what you want the cartridge to do.
    __________________
    Jerry "JUD" B. Bauduin
    Remington Man
    Shoot small, miss small. Or shoot small and hit small!
    Reply With Quote
      #5  
    Unread 02-24-2014, 01:07 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Location: Alabama
    Posts: 9,247
    Re: .264 WM, 260 rem, or what else?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Coleman 45 View Post
    I have always wondered why there is no factory long action 6.5 rounds, like a standardized 6.5-06 easily available.
    .264 WinMag is a magnum long action caliber. The .260 Rem is a short-action, but uses the standard (.308/.30-06/.270) bolt face.

    You could build a 6.5-284, a 6.5 Sherman, or a .260 Ackley Improved on your long action. Which would make a nice hunting rifle, because you could load those long Berger 130 & 140 Hybrids all the way out to the lands, and still have that extra magazine length to shoot it as a repeater and hold a full magazine. Which is where using a short action reciever kind of cripples you, because they have a short magazine box and can't load the 6.5's to their full potential with the long & heavy 6.5 bullets.

    I recommend using the long action for any of those calibers. It will be added convenience, and I think you'll like having that extra magazine room for loading them long.
    __________________
    "I'm just a peckerwood who lives in the hills with too many guns..." - Bob Lee Swagger

    "Give me a minute...I'm good. Give me an hour...I'm great. Give me 6 months...And I'm unbeatable." - Col. Hannibal Smith

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by WildRose View Post
    The 284 is to the STW what a tricycle is to a Ninja.
    Reply With Quote
      #6  
    Unread 02-24-2014, 01:12 PM
    Bronze Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2014
    Location: Sterling City, Texas
    Posts: 31
    Re: .264 WM, 260 rem, or what else?

    The only problem is the fact that I would rather not start handloading yet, as i am just about to start college, and this is probably a project that will happen in a few years from now anyway. I picked a bad time to start wanting to shoot longrange didn't I
    Reply With Quote
      #7  
    Unread 02-24-2014, 01:15 PM
    Gold Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2013
    Location: Maple Valley, Washington
    Posts: 851
    Re: .264 WM, 260 rem, or what else?

    The new king of the hill in 6.5mm as far as commercially available stuff goes is the 26 Nosler. (Check out Nosler's website.) Since a gunsmith would have to install the barrel anyway it wouldn't take much to open up the bolt face and fix up the magazine to hold the fatter rounds which are the same COAL as the 30-06. Disclaimer: It is anticipated that this will be a barrel burner - but as has been said on here before, barrels are like tires, when they wear out just get a new one.
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes



    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 AM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC