Long Range Hunting Online Magazine

Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics


.264 Win Mag opinions

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-22-2010, 08:50 AM
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,471
Re: .264 Win Mag opinions

Get a long barrel 26" at the least and some Retumbo powder. I have a 27 3/4" Shilen on a Rem 700, it's what was left of a 28" blank. With 130 Nosler Accubond I get 3350 fps with 66.5 grs Retumbo and bug hole groups. As a paper puncher the barrel will not last long. Shoot it working up a load and check the zero every year and hunt with it and it will last you a life time.
Reply With Quote
  •   #9  
    Unread 06-22-2010, 10:20 AM
    Junior Member
    Join Date: Apr 2010
    Location: Fargo, North Dakota
    Posts: 11
    Re: .264 Win Mag opinions

    I was actually going to get it in a 700 Sendero SFII. I really appreciate all the info and comments. That 3200-3300 range is what I was looking for with the 26" bbl and the large case, I don't mind using a lil extra powder as long as it isn't too much for the casing and barrel, which is exactly the heads up I was hoping to get. I have not heard much about the 6.5-284 and will definitely keep my options open with that as well as the 300WSM and 7STW, but as far as the 300WSM and 7STW, I wasn't looking at going quite that big yet. I have a 300RUM that works quite well for now.

    Has anyone found a good load for 129gr SST for the 264. I was also looking at the 120 Amax, 95 Vmax and 90 TNT. A lil help will save lotza time and money.

    Thanx to all!
    Reply With Quote

    Unread 06-23-2010, 08:47 AM
    Platinum Member
    Join Date: Jan 2008
    Posts: 1,471
    Re: .264 Win Mag opinions

    I don't know if the 90 TNT will hold up under the velocity you will be pushing it from a 264 Mag. It has a mighty thin jacket. It could sling it's self apart. The V-max might be OK though. They usually will handle the high velocity pretty well. I have never tried the light bullets in my 264 mag. The lightest I have gone is the 120 Nosler BT. I was getting about 3650 fps with good accuracy with Retumbo. I decided not to use it for white tail deer which is what I use this rifle for. I have used the 120 ballistic tip at 3000 fps from my 6.5X55 Swede and on shots around 100 yards it is very destructive and usually will not exit a deer shot through the shoulders. I was afraid at 3650 fps velocity the bullet would evaporate on the hair on a close shot. I went with the 130 Accubond and after taking 4 deer with it this season from 98 to 275 yards I feel that I made the right decision.
    Reply With Quote


    Thread Tools
    Display Modes

    Similar Threads for: .264 Win Mag opinions
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    Looking for some opinions, please help! Pbailey Long Range Hunting & Shooting 9 07-16-2011 05:44 PM
    25-06 Opinions kiltednerd Long Range Hunting & Shooting 18 03-27-2010 07:37 PM
    opinions on a 7mm wsm outdooraddict The Basics, Starting Out 9 03-24-2008 10:46 PM
    25-284- help and opinions. ol mike The Basics, Starting Out 15 10-18-2005 03:15 PM
    Opinions on the 7 STW? TrpD345 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 14 09-15-2005 08:06 AM

    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 PM.

    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC