Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics


Reply

.264 Win Mag opinions

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-20-2010, 03:37 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 11
.264 Win Mag opinions

I have been doing some looking around and talking with knowledgeable people and reading tons of ballistic charts and I have come to the conclusion that I am going to get into a .264 Win Mag for long range deer hunting and target shooting. Everywhere I looked I found very few ballistics and reloading information on the 264. Most everything was for standard cheap factory ammo and the ballistics were not that great, but I cannot find any good handload information and was wondering if anyone out there has any opinions of the .264 and any information that may get me started. Thanx!

~Bausch
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-20-2010, 07:36 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 178
Re: .264 Win Mag opinions

From what I've read, don't go short on barrel length if you want to reap the benefits of that case capacity.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-20-2010, 11:11 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 372
Re: .264 Win Mag opinions

Check Reloadersnest.com for load data. They have a good bit of info, but always start at least 10% low. If you want to pay 19 bucks ammoguide.com is also good for load info. As far as the caliber, it is the ony 6.5 I never intend to own. It is horribly inefficient and I can put a safe but high pressure load in my 6.5-284 and come very close to a 264 win mag with 15% less powder. Not trying to change your mind, just not fond fo the cartridge. However like others said, you need a 26 inch tube at a minimum, and if you are building it, I would recommend a 28 inch, even for a hunting rifle. My dad has a 280 ackley with a 27 inch shilen that has been turned down to an ultralite taper, it is bedded nicely and on a Husqvarna action and shoots sub MOA with anything I have tried in it, but I have limited reloading time with it, maybe 8-10 loads. Point is you can get a lot of potential from a long lightweight barrel. I'd go with a medium sporter type taper. You guys will notice I haven't ordered barrels for a custom rifle so I don't know the numbers on the tapers. But I have played with a lot of custom rifles others have had built.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-20-2010, 03:58 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 98
Re: .264 Win Mag opinions

Luv mine, its a Rem 700 CDL SF, 68 grains of Retumbo, 140 gr Bergers,WW cases, Fed 215M primers gives me 3166fps with SD's in the single digits. Having another one built as we speak, Stiller action, Broughton 5R barrel, HS precision stock, I think it'll be a shooter, at least I hope so.
If cartridge efficiency were the criteria for owning long range rifles, I think you would have to eliminate about half of the popular long range chamberings. JMO
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-20-2010, 07:04 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 372
Re: .264 Win Mag opinions

I agree that most long range cartridges are inefficient. The 6.5-284 is the exception to the rule in my opinion. I get 3130 with a 140 VLD with 51 grains of RL17 and a 215 primer.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-21-2010, 07:28 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Gillette WY
Posts: 725
Re: .264 Win Mag opinions

I love mine. 700 sendero with some minor trigger work and a bedding job and it will shoot 1/4 MOA with amaxs. 69 gr. of h1000 will put it at 3230 FPS
__________________
Remington 700 7mm SAUM Magnum Research Barrel
Remington 700 7mm Rem Mag Ultralight
Remington 700 22-243 Supressed
Savage Target Action 6mm-284
Savage Target Action 6.5x47 Lapua
Savage Predator Hunter Max1 6.5-284 Norma
Savage Predator Hunter Max 1 22-284 Norma
Savage Bear Hunter 338 Win Mag
"Gotta Kill It Before You Can Grill It"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-22-2010, 05:58 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 372
Re: .264 Win Mag opinions

Sweet!! I have seen exactly that velocity from that 6.5-284 but I was inside the danger zone of pressure levels I believe. It was listed as a safe load with a cci200 I lit it off with a Fed 215. Apparently that was a bit much. that is one difference, If I see 3200 fps I know it is time for me to back it down a bit. it will come with a sticky bolt and some seriously deminished case life. I would imagine you won't have to worry about that with the win mag. but man that thing sure likes powder!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: .264 Win Mag opinions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Looking for some opinions, please help! Pbailey Long Range Hunting & Shooting 9 07-16-2011 05:44 PM
25-06 Opinions kiltednerd Long Range Hunting & Shooting 18 03-27-2010 07:37 PM
opinions on a 7mm wsm outdooraddict The Basics, Starting Out 9 03-24-2008 10:46 PM
25-284- help and opinions. ol mike The Basics, Starting Out 15 10-18-2005 03:15 PM
Opinions on the 7 STW? TrpD345 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 14 09-15-2005 08:06 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC