close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics

Reply

264" 130g scirocco advertised BC

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 05-05-2011, 05:30 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hermiston, Oregon
Posts: 2,026
264" 130g scirocco advertised BC

Was looking over swift sciroccos the other night and came across something that doesn't seem right to me.

They claim a .571 BC from a 130g .264" bullet, how the hell do they come up with that??? Thats higher then any bullet that I can really think of besides the 140g VLD/AMAX, and its really not to far off of those. Beats the pants off any other 130 and 140 bullet reguardless. How do they gain almost a whole .1 value greater??

The 129g SST is pretty sleek and slender itself for a lowly .485

The 130g AB is also advertised at about .488

Anyone care to share thoughts or experiences with this bullet?? Love to hear it.

Think I'm going to make me a phone call to Swift tomorrow while I'm at it, pick there brain a bit...
Reply With Quote
  •   #2  
    Unread 05-05-2011, 05:53 AM
    Bronze Member
     
    Join Date: May 2011
    Location: Stillwater Pa.
    Posts: 71
    Re: 264" 130g scirocco advertised BC

    The bc's of the 264 seem to run on the high end. Even the black hills gold ammo is advertised at 2750 and a BC of .58 with a 142 grain sierra matchking.
    I would love for someone with a great understanding of this to add more.
    Reply With Quote

      #3  
    Unread 05-05-2011, 07:31 AM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2005
    Location: Pocahontas, AR
    Posts: 1,046
    Re: 264" 130g scirocco advertised BC

    Keep in mind that the jacket is VERY thick, which allows a very long, streamlined bullet.

    I have talked to Brad at Swift a couple of times, it appears that they are sticking to their guns on the BC of that bullet. He told me that a little jump was better, .030-.050. Brad commented that this was possibly the best bullet they have made to date.

    They have been shooting for the purpose of a new manual & only mentioned RL powders to me, but most 264 shooters get best results with Retumbo.

    I have a new Ruger Number 1 264, I will try them soon.
    __________________
    You will not make peace with the Blue Coats, you are free to go.
    Reply With Quote
      #4  
    Unread 05-05-2011, 08:20 AM
    Gold Member
     
    Join Date: Jun 2006
    Location: Shangri-La
    Posts: 955
    Re: 264" 130g scirocco advertised BC

    I'm using the 130 gr Scirrocco II in my 6.5 rem mag (26" Douglas barrel 1 in 8). First Scirrocco I have gotten to shoot good in any rifle. There are a couple of bullets that shoot a little better but this is typical for me




    Anyway, I have a Zeiss 4.5x14x44 with the RapidZ800 reticle on it. The Zeiss website calculator says that with the .571 BC and a velocity of ~3200 fps then I could just set it on ~14 power. So I took my load at ~3200 fps, zeroed it at 200 yds and then shot it at 300 and 400 yds. The 14 power didn't work out for me. Had to set the power back down to ~12.5 power to bring the POI up to POA.

    That indicates to me that the advertised BC is not correct or the reticle/calculator on the Zeiss is not.

    Only did this once so need to go back and reshoot 200 yds, then 300 yds, 400 yds and 600 yds to verify.
    __________________
    If you can read this, thank a teacher.......if you are reading this in English, thank a soldier.
    Reply With Quote
      #5  
    Unread 05-05-2011, 08:39 AM
    Official LRH Sponsor
     
    Join Date: Mar 2007
    Posts: 633
    Re: 264" 130g scirocco advertised BC

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by remingtonman_25_06 View Post
    Was looking over swift sciroccos the other night and came across something that doesn't seem right to me.

    They claim a .571 BC from a 130g .264" bullet, how the hell do they come up with that??? Thats higher then any bullet that I can really think of besides the 140g VLD/AMAX, and its really not to far off of those. Beats the pants off any other 130 and 140 bullet reguardless. How do they gain almost a whole .1 value greater??

    The 129g SST is pretty sleek and slender itself for a lowly .485

    The 130g AB is also advertised at about .488

    Anyone care to share thoughts or experiences with this bullet?? Love to hear it.

    Think I'm going to make me a phone call to Swift tomorrow while I'm at it, pick there brain a bit...
    I measured a G1 BC of .491 for that bullet. G7 BC is .251.
    book

    It's got a decent ogive design, but a poor (short and steep) boat tail for base drag reduction. Certainly not a design that could possibly produce a .571 average G1 BC. Even at 3000 fps, the G1 BC is just .515, degrading to .453 at 1500 fps.

    A thick jacket for a long bullet...? Sure it makes the bullet longer, but that doesn't mean high BC. Lengthening the nose and tail will reduce drag, but lengthening the bearing surface does nothing for drag so it's irrelevant.

    None of my analysis included group shooting (precision) testing so I can't comment on that. They may be extremely precise, but the BC claim is not accurate.

    -Bryan
    Reply With Quote
      #6  
    Unread 05-05-2011, 11:36 AM
    Bronze Member
     
    Join Date: May 2011
    Location: Stillwater Pa.
    Posts: 71
    Re: 264" 130g scirocco advertised BC

    The .58 BC I referred to earlier is Black hills specs for the 6.5x284 norma with the 142gr matchking. Didn't know if that made any difference. Still seems a bit on the high side.
    Reply With Quote
      #7  
    Unread 05-05-2011, 07:32 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2005
    Location: Pocahontas, AR
    Posts: 1,046
    Re: 264" 130g scirocco advertised BC

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by bsl135 View Post
    I measured a G1 BC of .491 for that bullet. G7 BC is .251.
    book

    It's got a decent ogive design, but a poor (short and steep) boat tail for base drag reduction. Certainly not a design that could possibly produce a .571 average G1 BC. Even at 3000 fps, the G1 BC is just .515, degrading to .453 at 1500 fps.

    A thick jacket for a long bullet...? Sure it makes the bullet longer, but that doesn't mean high BC. Lengthening the nose and tail will reduce drag, but lengthening the bearing surface does nothing for drag so it's irrelevant.

    None of my analysis included group shooting (precision) testing so I can't comment on that. They may be extremely precise, but the BC claim is not accurate.

    -Bryan
    Good info, thanks!! I did not mean that a long bullet Guaranteed a good BC, merely that it increased the odds with all else equal. Thanks for supplying real numbers, may actually be close to the 130 Accubond that is rated at .488 I think. Have you tested that one.
    Looks like the 130 & 140 Berger look even better now.
    Thanks
    __________________
    You will not make peace with the Blue Coats, you are free to go.
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes


    Similar Threads for: 264" 130g scirocco advertised BC
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    WTT-Barnes Triple-Shock X Bullets 270 Cal 130g HP BT 50ct coyotewallace Reloading Equipment and Components 0 12-14-2010 04:00 AM
    Do you get more MOA than advertised? Scottish Mag Long Range Hunting & Shooting 2 04-18-2009 01:25 PM
    130g Wildcat bullets in a .257 Wby esshup Reloading 5 08-25-2008 09:03 PM
    270 Win, 130g TSX and 22-243 Middlestead question dog caller Reloading 2 03-05-2006 11:12 PM
    "Swift Scirocco projectiles"- my apologies! EXFFPM Long Range Hunting & Shooting 8 10-29-2002 11:56 PM


    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 AM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC