close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics


Reply

Is the .223 WSSM really that bad??

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Unread 08-29-2013, 12:07 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Big Horn Basin, Wyoming
Posts: 4,208
Re: Is the .223 WSSM really that bad??

That thing is going to SCREAM out of a 26" barrel.. what bullet are you going to shoot?
__________________
Mike


" Real elk guns start with the number 3 or bigger and blow two holes, one in and one out." - My Dad
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Unread 08-29-2013, 01:43 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 9
Re: Is the .223 WSSM really that bad??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tikkamike View Post
That thing is going to SCREAM out of a 26" barrel.. what bullet are you going to shoot?
55's so far is what im thinking going to use it for coyotes, which will be its main job....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Unread 04-18-2016, 08:51 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 5
Re: Is the .223 WSSM really that bad??

It is no diff than 220 swift or 22250 only faster i have 2 a coyote and a 22 inch model all shoot well coyote .75 at 100 yards with 70 gr . there great i have all 3 wssms nothing like them
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Unread 04-19-2016, 08:38 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC, oceanfront
Posts: 3,810
Re: Is the .223 WSSM really that bad??

4 issues with the 223WSSM:
- Brass availability
- Extremely thick necks
- Large diameter case
- Bad accurate barrel life

WSSMs should have been produced at 25WSSM & 26WSSM -ONLY. But even here, the potentials are only realized with neck turning/custom chamber, use of a true single shot magnum diameter action, and controlled round push feed with standing blade ejection. Forget a magazine,, more trouble than worth.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Unread 04-19-2016, 05:31 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: N.D.
Posts: 4,039
Re: Is the .223 WSSM really that bad??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikecr View Post
4 issues with the 223WSSM:
- Brass availability
- Extremely thick necks
- Large diameter case
- Bad accurate barrel life

WSSMs should have been produced at 25WSSM & 26WSSM -ONLY. But even here, the potentials are only realized with neck turning/custom chamber, use of a true single shot magnum diameter action, and controlled round push feed with standing blade ejection. Forget a magazine,, more trouble than worth.
yep... even my 25wssm has rather thick necks and some softer bullets want to deform while seating them...
On the mag., possibly one up, one down. My Coyote 25wssm seems to like that. Forget three down though. It will likely try to tip them in the mag..
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Unread 04-20-2016, 08:46 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Southwest ND
Posts: 116
Re: Is the .223 WSSM really that bad??

I say if you want it than get it! I have 2 22-250ai which are pretty much the same thing and will always have atleast one rifle chambered in 22-250ai. They are a freaking blast and are hell on coyotes! Just rathole some brass away and have fun!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Unread 04-20-2016, 10:00 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,583
Re: Is the .223 WSSM really that bad??

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkupper View Post
Most of the people who I know who got one said the biggest problem was getting the cartridges to feed correctly from the mag. I will say that none of these individuals shot a lot though, so I can't speak for barrel wear.

This problem is easily solved by installing a center feed mag box. All short mag have this problem if they are in a staggered magazine. The center feed mags are also the best in the big magnums because of there diameter and the fact that the bullet never touches anything during charging.

The barrel life/erosion has more to do with shooting habits and loading than the cartridge it's self.
If you shoot to fast in any cartridge (Not allowing some cool down time) you can wash the barrel out prematurely. if you load a slow burning powder that does not completely burn in the barrel, you get barrel erosion and throat erosion early on.

If you shoot a dirty barrel (Carbon and copper fouled) this also speeds up the process.

Twist rates and barrel material can also have a bearing on barrel life.

Another thing that can decrease barrel life is excessive velocities.

I have owned and shot most of the short mags and found no real difference in the barrel life compared to other cartridges pushed to there velocities.

The short mag design was designed to improve the powder burn inside the case minimizing the amount of un-burnt powder from entering the throat, and if the proper load is shot at the same velocity and with the same weight bullet, in theory barrel erosion should be less in the short mag, Not more.

The 223 WSSM can be loaded to exceed most other .223's. but if maintained properly and fed good well though out ammo barrel erosion should not be an issue. In fact an improper load in a .308 can
wash out a barrel faster.

The .223 WSSM is a great and fun cartridge and is properly loaded, fired and cleaned it should last a long time.

Just my opinion

J E CUSTOM
__________________
"PRESS ON"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC