Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

200 Gameking vs 210 Berger

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 11-21-2009, 09:38 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South of Canada and North of Wyoming
Posts: 5,954
Re: 200 Gameking vs 210 Berger

[QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigngreen View Post
My dad had a 210 Berger out of a 300WBY poke through a deer the other day just over 250yrds, it was back and didn't hit bone could not even tell there was a hole there till we got the hide down
Hmmmm....

Quote:
I'm loading both the Bergers and Accubond and pack both just in case the Berger fails the first shot.
I'm doing the same with my set up... the 210 thick in the chamber and the 180 E-Tip right below it in the mag.

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tang View Post
I would include 200gr Accubonds in this question, but they are sold out everywhere. I most definetly will be using the 200gr Accubond as my all around load for deer and maybe an Elk trip.

Would I be giving up much if I used the 180 Accubond ?
You should be able to back order the 200 AB's from Midway. I wouldn't think it would take too long to get them?

Here's my view on the 180 AB in the 300 RUM. I've been reading more reports of the AB coming to pieces on impact, so I will shy away from usung it at the high RUM velocities. The 180 E-Tip has a higher advertised BC than the AB, .523 vs .507, although one of our members said he tested them both to be about the same at about .523 or so. But Bryan Litz tested it (180 AB lower than advertised). With the E-Tip, I see no reason to use the 180 AB unless it has better accuracy. But... I would go with the 200 AB before the 180 AB to get more mass and slow the velocity, in hope of more optimum performance. I was testin the 200, but ran out of them and they aren't on the shelves here either. I was getting good results, but I am very happy with the E-Tips and I like their monometal construction. and they will leave an awesome wound channel. They are also flatter shooting which appeals to me because I zero at 300 yds.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-21-2009, 10:14 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 305
Re: 200 Gameking vs 210 Berger

Midway has the 200gr Accubond on back order. Im iffy about trying any Barnes product, because I dont want to foul my barrel up.

Im breaking the barrel in with 180gr Hornady Interlocks, with a load of 83gr of RL22.

I'm probably going to order some 210gr VLD's, and use the 200gr Gamekings that I have here for punching paper and setting off Tannerite.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-22-2009, 10:23 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern Id.
Posts: 3,356
Re: 200 Gameking vs 210 Berger

To answer the original question, I'd take the game king over the berger for shots under 400 yds........Rich
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-24-2009, 03:23 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 305
Re: 200 Gameking vs 210 Berger

Guys what do you think about running a 168gr Barnes TSX at high speed ?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-24-2009, 07:17 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Cranbrook, BC, Canada
Posts: 154
Re: 200 Gameking vs 210 Berger

I run the 200gr accubond in my 300rum. The gamekings are a little to soft and really fragment from my 300wsm, so I didn't try them in the RUM. I have shot several deer at under 30 yards with the RUM and the accubonds, which run 3247fps from my rifle, and all have had serious wound channels, but no tracking was required, they seem to be "numbed" from the impact. I think in total it's been 4 whitetail, 3 black bear a moose and 1 elk, all with the accubond between 20 and 400 yards. The "wock" of the bullet impact is far louder than any other rifle I have. I have also fired them into dry newspaper from 100 to 500 yards. They seem to hold together well, and were very accurate for me.

I have also fired the 165,168 and 180 tsx. They shot flat enough but the wind pushed them around more than the accubonds, and my average group size went from .3moa to .5moa. I couldn't get them to shoot any better with 3 different powders and a few seating depths. I gave up before using up more barrel life. I use them in my 300wsm, and they shoot very well and work well on game.

I picked up some berger 190gr hunting VLD's last weekend to try out. The 210's were sold out, so I thought I would give the 190's a go. Hopefully they shoot well in my rifle.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-24-2009, 09:53 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South of Canada and North of Wyoming
Posts: 5,954
Re: 200 Gameking vs 210 Berger

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tang View Post
Guys what do you think about running a 168gr Barnes TSX at high speed ?
Not something I would do in the 300 RUM. IMO, it's a waste of the cartridge. The TSX has a BC of .404 and the TTSX has a BC of .470. The 180 E-Tip has a BC of .523. The smallest bullet (other than the GS HV 177) that I would run out of the RUM would be a 180 and the only 180 I would run would be the E-Tip because of the high velocities and it's a monometal. The smalles jacketed bullet I would run would be 200 grains and the smallest explosive type bullets would be the 208 AMax or 210 Berger. I'm not really a big fan of the Barnes bullets because they have low BC's, are pure copper and would probably foul more than other bullets, and reports of failure to expand.

Get a bullet that will get the most out of your ultra
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-25-2009, 05:55 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 305
Re: 200 Gameking vs 210 Berger

Quote:
Originally Posted by MontanaRifleman View Post
Not something I would do in the 300 RUM. IMO, it's a waste of the cartridge. The TSX has a BC of .404 and the TTSX has a BC of .470. The 180 E-Tip has a BC of .523. The smallest bullet (other than the GS HV 177) that I would run out of the RUM would be a 180 and the only 180 I would run would be the E-Tip because of the high velocities and it's a monometal. The smalles jacketed bullet I would run would be 200 grains and the smallest explosive type bullets would be the 208 AMax or 210 Berger. I'm not really a big fan of the Barnes bullets because they have low BC's, are pure copper and would probably foul more than other bullets, and reports of failure to expand.

Get a bullet that will get the most out of your ultra

Thanks for the help
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: 200 Gameking vs 210 Berger
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
.338 Gameking angus-5024 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 3 10-07-2009 10:52 PM
7mm 150 gr. gameking 270bdl Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 6 05-05-2007 10:38 AM
Used Sierra H.P.B.T. Gameking ?? ppro Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 15 03-14-2007 12:16 AM
65gr gameking cdog Reloading 4 10-09-2006 06:26 PM
7mm 175 sierra gameking 270bdl Long Range Hunting & Shooting 1 04-28-2006 08:36 AM

Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 32.12%
62 Votes
NO - 52.33%
101 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 15.54%
30 Votes
Total Votes: 193
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC