Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

180 gr 30 cal N Accubond performance

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-15-2009, 07:32 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 1,219
180 gr 30 cal N Accubond performance

Just thought I'd post this since I wasn't expecting these results:

180 grain Nosler Accubond fired from 300wsm @ 2940 FPS. Struck white tail fawn/yearling at 25 yards in the neck, penetrated through neck into spine (about 9" or so of bone contact in the spinal column) continued on to lodge in the pelvic region. I wasn't expecting to find the bullet so I wasn't paying attention to the the exact amount of bone contact. Recovered the bullet and weighted at 110 grains. A little lighter than I was expecting but still mostly in tact. I was able to identify rifling marks on the back portion of the bullet.

Just a little tid bit of information for you guys.
__________________
I used to re-load but now I "hand-load".
-- Well, at least I try --
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-15-2009, 11:05 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 824
Re: 180 gr 30 cal N Accubond performance

Britz, I've only recovered a few 180 30 Cal AB's and have averaged about 70% weight retention. I too was a little surprised that it wasn't a bit more but the bullet has always done its job. I still use 154 Hornady spire points in my 280 and they have alway average in the high 80's to 90%. I still like the overall performance of the AB's though.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2009, 06:25 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Youngsville, NC
Posts: 379
Try the Swift Scirocco if you want more bullet weight retention

The Accubond has performed very well for me and at a much lower cost than other bonded bullets. The nice thing is you can shoot Balistic tips at paper and Acubonds at fur. They shoot virtualy the same. The Accubond is relatively easy to get to shoot well.

The Swift Scirocco is still a superior bullet design for weight retention. It takes some tweeking to get the Scirocco to shoot as good as the Accubond.

I don't understand why you would shoot a small deer linearly starting in the neck. Especially at 50 yards or less. A direct shot under the ear or through the lungs would have saved a lot of good meat.

Nat Lambeth
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2009, 03:49 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 1,219
Re: 180 gr 30 cal N Accubond performance

I intended to shoot it directly below the head, but I hit a couple inches low. Two deer, two shots rapid fire, woops!
__________________
I used to re-load but now I "hand-load".
-- Well, at least I try --
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: 180 gr 30 cal N Accubond performance
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Terminal Performance - Accubond vs SST kiwicharlie Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 5 05-22-2011 12:39 PM
Nosler Accubond Performance statjunk Reloading 27 10-28-2010 01:15 PM
Accubond performance - only 13.43% weight retention ss7mm Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 8 09-03-2006 11:13 AM
Accubond performance on elk sambo3006 Long Range Hunting & Shooting 1 10-25-2005 06:07 PM
Nosler 200 Accubond performance D.P. Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 7 03-15-2005 12:27 PM

Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 32.20%
76 Votes
NO - 50.42%
119 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 17.37%
41 Votes
Total Votes: 236
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC