Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

168 smk vs 175 smk

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-01-2008, 10:12 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South West Montana
Posts: 270
168 smk vs 175 smk

Looking into trying some 175 smk's as i have had really good luck with the 168's and am wondering if there is any real advantages to the 175 smk's over the 168's if your keeping your shots inside 800 yards??


Jordan
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-02-2008, 11:24 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,598
Re: 168 smk vs 175 smk

The 175's are supposed to be more accurate past 600 yards
__________________
range it,check the wind, dial in correction, aim and only one shot
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-02-2008, 11:51 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The rifle range, or archery range or behind the computer in Alaska
Posts: 3,418
Re: 168 smk vs 175 smk

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwp475 View Post
The 175's are supposed to be more accurate past 600 yards
This is correct. The 168 is designed for up to 600 yards. The 175 is designed for 1000 yards. On paper and in theroy that is. According to my own personal experiances (in the 308 win) this HAS been the case. Now in my experiance the 168 offered no better results from 0-600 than the 175. The 175 did everything the 168 could do. t 1K it was a different story. The 175's were by far more accurate and shot perfect round holes at 1K. Even at near sea level (80'ish) and in sub zero air. This was a a mild velocity as well. Around 2550 FPS. The 168's shot nearly 2700 FPS and wouldnt make it to 1K without going sideways and obviously huge groups.

IMHO the 175 makes the 168 near obsolete for the 308. The 168 has had some great success in matches in the past however. I still think the 168 is overrated. Just my .02
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Broz View Post
Please just answer one very simple question. Why would anyone shooting long range load a low BC , low SD 168 gr offering in a 300 win???????

My answer to this is. The only reason is to make the 7 RM look good. There is no other reason.

Jeff.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-02-2008, 04:43 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 30
Re: 168 smk vs 175 smk

My 20" Rock barrel on my bolt gun shots GMM 168gr to 1000k just fine. The 175mk carries a little more KE to 1000K so it takes a little less windage and elevation correction. I think it all just comes down to personal preference, but I could stick with the 168's in my rifle. I shoot my .260 when I know extended range is on tap for the day.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Do you plan to buy a new custom rifle in the next 12 months?
YES - Of course - 73.08%
1,547 Vote
NO - wife/girlfriend won't let me. - 26.92%
570 Votes
Total Votes: 2,117
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC