close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics

Reply

168 smk vs 175 smk

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 12-01-2008, 10:12 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South West Montana
Posts: 270
168 smk vs 175 smk

Looking into trying some 175 smk's as i have had really good luck with the 168's and am wondering if there is any real advantages to the 175 smk's over the 168's if your keeping your shots inside 800 yards??


Jordan
Reply With Quote
  •   #2  
    Unread 12-02-2008, 11:24 AM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2005
    Location: USA
    Posts: 2,598
    Re: 168 smk vs 175 smk

    The 175's are supposed to be more accurate past 600 yards
    __________________
    range it,check the wind, dial in correction, aim and only one shot
    Reply With Quote

      #3  
    Unread 12-02-2008, 11:51 AM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2003
    Location: The rifle range, or archery range or behind the computer in Alaska
    Posts: 3,819
    Re: 168 smk vs 175 smk

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by jwp475 View Post
    The 175's are supposed to be more accurate past 600 yards
    This is correct. The 168 is designed for up to 600 yards. The 175 is designed for 1000 yards. On paper and in theroy that is. According to my own personal experiances (in the 308 win) this HAS been the case. Now in my experiance the 168 offered no better results from 0-600 than the 175. The 175 did everything the 168 could do. t 1K it was a different story. The 175's were by far more accurate and shot perfect round holes at 1K. Even at near sea level (80'ish) and in sub zero air. This was a a mild velocity as well. Around 2550 FPS. The 168's shot nearly 2700 FPS and wouldnt make it to 1K without going sideways and obviously huge groups.

    IMHO the 175 makes the 168 near obsolete for the 308. The 168 has had some great success in matches in the past however. I still think the 168 is overrated. Just my .02
    __________________
    __________________
    Long range shooting is a process that ends with a result. Once you start to focus on the result (how bad your last shot was, how big the group is going to be, what your buck will score, what your match score is, what place you are in...) then you loose the capacity to focus on the process.
    Reply With Quote
      #4  
    Unread 12-02-2008, 04:43 PM
    Bronze Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2008
    Posts: 30
    Re: 168 smk vs 175 smk

    My 20" Rock barrel on my bolt gun shots GMM 168gr to 1000k just fine. The 175mk carries a little more KE to 1000K so it takes a little less windage and elevation correction. I think it all just comes down to personal preference, but I could stick with the 168's in my rifle. I shoot my .260 when I know extended range is on tap for the day.
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes



    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC