Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

Zeiss HD5 vs Swarovski Z5

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 06-13-2013, 01:06 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 26
Re: Zeiss HD5 vs Swarovski Z5

I love my HD5 5-25 so far. I personally do not have swaroz5 but played with few and loved it too. It's also 60% more $$ than HD5 so I hope it has better optics or better something if I was buying it. Personally if I was in market got $1500-$1600 scope i would get the z5, and If i wanted to stay at around a $1000 I would get the HD5. The only thing I would change on HD5 is the z1000 reticle. It little too thick for my liking. Maybe it's because the Varmint Z reticle on my Conquest is just about perfect.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-13-2013, 07:01 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Denham Springs Louisiana
Posts: 18
Re: Zeiss HD5 vs Swarovski Z5

Quote:
Originally Posted by highridge1 View Post
Easy choice I would take te HD5 excellent scope , great glass, locking turrets etched reticle, known to handle recoil better than swarovski and a much better buy.I can't think of a reason to go with the swarovski.
You keep making this comment with no info to support it. Where are you getting this from? Do I need to return my new z5?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-13-2013, 09:35 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NW Montana
Posts: 814
Re: Zeiss HD5 vs Swarovski Z5

I don't think you need to return your swarovski, just have known a few guys that have had swarovski's fail on rifles like 338 ultra, 338 lapua etc. actually had lenses comes loose and things brake internally. I don't know anyone that has had similar issues with a Zeiss. I think Swarovski makes a awesome scope it's just the fact that so does Zeiss at a better price and incredible reliability.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-13-2013, 10:35 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 81
Re: Zeiss HD5 vs Swarovski Z5

what do u mean "fish eyes" when looking thro the hd5?? im considering the hd5 for my .270 .....wouldnt mind owning the swaro but isnt the swaro plex reticle on the z5 a bit thin???? thinner than the z3?? zeiss has a great plex reticle tho and thats one reason im leaning toward the zeiss...im gonna have to look thro one a bit before purchasing tho

if i dont end up with the hd5 im considering the regular conquest in 4.5-14x50
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-14-2013, 01:56 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Denham Springs Louisiana
Posts: 18
Re: Zeiss HD5 vs Swarovski Z5

I was just joking I'm not gonna return my swaro. I don't think swaro has any more failures than zeiss.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
In the last 12 months, what was your longest rifle kill on big game?
0 to 200 yards - 25.99%
1,547 Vote
201 to 400 yards - 32.15%
1,914 Vote
401 to 600 yards - 23.01%
1,370 Vote
601 to 800 yards - 10.05%
598 Votes
801 to 1,000 yards - 3.91%
233 Votes
Over 1,000 yards - 4.89%
291 Votes
Total Votes: 5,953
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC