Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

x50 or x56, is bigger always better??

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-24-2013, 10:37 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 16
x50 or x56, is bigger always better??

I've narrowed my choice for a new scope to the Zeiss conquest. Either 4.5-14x50 or 3-12x56. I'm very new really getting in-depth on optics. And just want some options. All the scopes I currently have are x50 and when I look though x40's I see a big difference. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-25-2013, 03:30 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Patagonia Mountains, Arizona
Posts: 752
Re: x50 or x56, is bigger always better??

Of course the 56mm is better. Not only does it give a 56/50^2 = 125% brighter image, carrying it will build up your muscles faster.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-25-2013, 08:14 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,863
Re: x50 or x56, is bigger always better??

Quote:
Originally Posted by LouBoyd View Post
Of course the 56mm is better. Not only does it give a 56/50^2 = 125% brighter image, carrying it will build up your muscles faster.

No idea what math formula you are following?? But its sure not "area=pi r squared"???
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-25-2013, 01:20 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Patagonia Mountains, Arizona
Posts: 752
Re: x50 or x56, is bigger always better??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sully2 View Post
No idea what math formula you are following?? But its sure not "area=pi r squared"???
Don't you know nothin? Pi r round? Cornbread r square!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-26-2013, 01:18 AM
Official LRH Sponsor
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 787
Actually, the benefit depends on the magnification and your age. For example, a 50 year old person has a maximum eye pupil size of about 6 mm in low light (i.e., for dark adapted eyes). As long as the exit pupil of the scope is larger than your eye pupil, the image will be as bright as viewing with the naked eye.

The exit pupil size is equal to the objective size divided by the magnification. For a 50 mm objective the exit pupil is 6 mm (i.e., the same size as the eye pupil) at a magnification of 8.3X. For a 56 mm objective the magnification is 9.3X at a 6 mm exit pupil size. At a magnification below about 8x both scopes have the same brightness for a 50 year old person. But at the same exit pupil size of 6 mm, the larger scope provides a12% higher magnification.

At higher magnifications, the ratio of exit pupil area to eye pupil area determines the brightness. For example, at a magnification of 12X, the smaller scope is (4.16/6)^2=48% as bright as the naked eye, and the larger scope is (4.67/6)^2=60% as bright as the naked eye. So, at 12X the larger scope is 25% brighter (as LouBoyd said).

If you do a lot of hunting in low light the larger objective can be worth the extra cost and weight.
__________________

www.HighPowerOptics.com
Sports Optics
Rifle Scope Installation Tool Kits for Rent
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-26-2013, 09:00 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montana
Posts: 46
Re: x50 or x56, is bigger always better??

I prefer the smaller lens every time big objectives require extra high rings/modified cheek pieces etc to get a good fit also if shooting from any position other than prone. good luck shouldering said modified rifle. It depends on the use of the rifle. if shooting off a bench at paper/steel then the sun is most likely out so you wont need added light transmission if you are specifically shooting long range at low light from fixed position then yes bigger would be better. All my current scopes are under 50mm when it gets darker i turn the scope down 40mm/6x is 6.6 exit pupil shots I have taken at this time of day always seem to be under 200 yards anyway. All that said I am looking for a high magnification scope of quality and most seem to come with 50mm or bigger objectives.....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-30-2013, 01:33 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 41
Re: x50 or x56, is bigger always better??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sully2 View Post
No idea what math formula you are following?? But its sure not "area=pi r squared"???
It's true that is the formula for finding the area of a circle, but when comparing the areas of 2 different circles the constants and common factors in the expression will cancel. So you can use diameter, radius, or 57.35 times the radius of each circle and you will arrive at the same ratio when finished...which in this case is a ratio of 1.2544:1. So there is 25.44% more area on a 56mm lens when compared to a 50mm.

It's really a trade off though. Bigger, heavier, and usually more expensive is the price you pay for having a brighter image at dusk and dawn.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
In the last 12 months, what was your longest rifle kill on big game?
0 to 200 yards - 25.96%
1,531 Vote
201 to 400 yards - 32.12%
1,894 Vote
401 to 600 yards - 23.08%
1,361 Vote
601 to 800 yards - 10.01%
590 Votes
801 to 1,000 yards - 3.92%
231 Votes
Over 1,000 yards - 4.92%
290 Votes
Total Votes: 5,897
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC