Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Long Range Scopes and Other Optics

Long Range Scopes and Other Optics Nightforce Optics


Reply

SWFA 3-15x42 Who got one?

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 05-02-2013, 06:59 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mukilteo, WA
Posts: 1,091
Re: SWFA 3-15x42 Who got one?

OK, I’ve spent some time now comparing glass on this thing and now I’m even more impressed. Lots of people were asking how it is compared with the SS 3-9:

With both set on 9X, the 3-15 has noticeably better resolution than my 3-9. It’s a pretty noticeable difference. Now resolution isn’t the only thing that matters—the 3-9 has a larger FOV power for power, and a larger apparent FOV (due in part to shorter eye relief). The 3-9 also has the edge in apparent brightness—though that may be somewhat an illusion caused by the shorter eye relief and larger apparent FOV. I don’t think the difference is ever large enough you can see something with the 3-9 you can’t with the 3-15, the 3-9 just “seems” a bit brighter. Both handle stray light very well. In short, if you’re happy with the 3-9 glass you’ll be even happier with the 3-15—especially if seeing detail at long range is what’s most important to you.

With the thicker center lines in the reticle, the 3-9 has an edge in low light if taking medium range shots on 3X where seeing those lines is important. On higher powers more appropriate to the range the 3-15 does fine. At closer ranges, even on 3X, it doesn’t really matter as both have the same sized posts for fast “point and shoot” vital zone shots.

Compared with the 16X fixed SS Classic, the 3-15 is really impressive. While the 16X is close in resolution, you notice when you compare them side by side it has a veiling flare that is not present in the 3-15 making the 3-15 look significantly more “clear.” As light gets dimmer this difference becomes more apparent and at a point the 16X is hard to look through/no longer usable, the 3-15X still looks great. Of course the fixed 16X was never meant to be a low light scope—in good light, especially on paper targets the 16X looks just fine. But when looking into the trees, etc, and especially as the light gets dimmer, the 3-15 jumps way out in front. People wondering why it’s so much more expensive than the rest of the classic series need only do one quick comparison like this to see where a big chunk of that money went.

Compared with the PST 6-24, the two are very close. Now my particular 6-24 has really, really good glass for the price range—for those who remember it was dramatically better than the two 4-16 PST’s I had. Comparing the two scopes side by side it’s on 15X difficult to tell the difference. The resolution is so close it’s hard to call a winner. The colors on the PST might look a tad better. As the light gets dimmer, the PST starts to show a small advantage on the higher powers as it should with the larger objective. So overall I’d have to give the slight edge to the PST, but they’re close enough you won’t notice the difference unless you’re really, really looking for it.

The PST obviously can be turned up to 24X for more detail at long range, the 3-15 has a FOV on 3X more than twice the size of the PST’s on 6X for use at close range. The SS has around double the amount of travel. Two excellent scopes in this price range offering different features so one can select the scope best suited to his application and make a good choice either way. I like them both.

After doing that I can say without a doubt the 3-15SS is dramatically better than the two 4-16 PST’s I had. Beyond the resolution and CA, the 4-16’s had a noticeable veiling flare that is not present with the 6-24 or the SS 3-15. But as I’ve said, that was some time ago, I’ll leave it to others with more recent models to do an in-depth comparo.

I did compare it to the 5-20 HD as well, and as you may expect the HD wins pretty easily. The difference isn’t as huge or noticeable as you may expect though if you’ve used the other fixed SS classics. The 3-15 is in another ballpark compared with them in my opinion. Considering the reticle, the turrets, the travel, etc, the 3-15 is a heck of a scope for its price.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-26-2013, 01:12 PM
Official LRH Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fort Shaw, Montana
Posts: 6,831
Re: SWFA 3-15x42 Who got one?

Ordered one of the SWFA 3-15x 42mm for my lightweight 7mm Allen Magnum. It currently has a Leupold Mk4 3.5-10x FFP which has served it well but there have been several instances where a higher magnification scope would have been nice. Will see how this one compares to the leuy. About 1/2 the price but about twice the vertical adjustment range as well.

After seeing the 3-15x and seeing how it works. May give the 5-20 HD a shot. Sounds like another great scope.

Thanks for your review.
__________________
Kirby Allen(50)

Allen Precision Shooting
Home of the Allen Magnum, Allen Xpress and Allen Tactical Wildcats and the Painkiller Muzzle brakes.

Farther, Faster and Flatter then ever before.

Web Page: www.apsrifles.com

allenmagnum@gmail.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-26-2013, 03:19 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 915
Re: SWFA 3-15x42 Who got one?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiftydriver View Post
Ordered one of the SWFA 3-15x 42mm for my lightweight 7mm Allen Magnum. It currently has a Leupold Mk4 3.5-10x FFP which has served it well but there have been several instances where a higher magnification scope would have been nice. Will see how this one compares to the leuy. About 1/2 the price but about twice the vertical adjustment range as well.

After seeing the 3-15x and seeing how it works. May give the 5-20 HD a shot. Sounds like another great scope.

Thanks for your review.
Kirby, I would be very interested in what you think about the 3-15x42 when you get it. I know not to expect it to be a Nightforce, but it looks to me like it could be a legitimate ELR type scope.

I have one of the fixed power models that I use to shoot F-T/R and I have so far been very pleased with it.

I plan to put the 3-15x42 on my .300 WM and possibly on my .375 H&H. Given your ELR experience and your experience with large cased, heavy caliber rounds, I would expect to find your feedback enlightening.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-27-2013, 07:41 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 715
Re: SWFA 3-15x42 Who got one?

I have one. Only about 30 shots with it but I think it's great. The smaller bell accommodates low rings which positions me better. The mini cattail works fine. I can see everything I need to through the glass. Clicks are audible and feel good. Tracking and mechanical function all work as intended. It's rated for the 50. If I had to nit pick, you need to come off the rifle to see the directional turret arrows and the FFP low power crosshair may be difficult to see game in low light situations (I'm not sure). I like FFP's because it gives you some quick options to range something without a rangefinder.

These SWFA scopes have a reputation of toughness and reliability although I'm not purposefully putting it through a horse wreck to find out. Back in the day, you bought a scope and had no idea where your POI would end up after an adjustment. These scopes steer you right in where your suppose to be every time. I tend to think glass quality is a little overrated. I'm more concerned with quick target acquisition and dependability.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-30-2013, 10:14 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 715
Re: SWFA 3-15x42 Who got one?

Update: Took this rifle out to test some loads. I mostly didn't touch the scope but decided to take the last two bullets and shoot a broken clay target I found. Went to make an adjustment and the elevation turret just spun w/o any clicks. Guess I'll be sending it back.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-30-2013, 10:36 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 1,167
Re: SWFA 3-15x42 Who got one?

Did you make sure the allens were tight on the turret? This turret attaches a bit differently than some you may be used to.

Scot E.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-30-2013, 11:13 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 715
Re: SWFA 3-15x42 Who got one?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scot E View Post
Did you make sure the allens were tight on the turret? This turret attaches a bit differently than some you may be used to.

Scot E.
That was it. I was out of light and didn't want to mess with in the desert at the time. Since I hadn't zero'd the turrets, I assumed they'd still be tight from the manufacturer but the windage screws were kinda loose too. That's the first thing I should have checked. Anyway, that's a knucklehead behind the trigger problem, not a scope problem.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC